[PATCH 11/14] ARM: OMAP2+: Add device-tree support for NOR flash

[mpfj-list@mimc.co.uk (Mark Jackson)]

On 05/03/13 14:46, Jon Hunter wrote:
> 
> On 03/05/2013 08:34 AM, Mark Jackson wrote:
>> On 26/02/13 17:30, Jon Hunter wrote:
>>> NOR flash is not currently supported when booting with device-tree
>>> on OMAP2+ devices. Add support to detect and configure NOR devices
>>> when booting with device-tree.
>>>
>>> Add documentation for the TI GPMC NOR binding.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Jon Hunter <jon-hunter@ti.com>
>>
>> I'm trying to test this series, and am unable get my NOR device recognised.
>>
>> If I remove all reference to NOR (and keep only my NAND device definition), then
>> everything seems to boot fine (so I'm assuming I've got at least the basics of
>> the patch set working).
>>
>> My GPMC tree looks like this:-

<snip>

>> 	nor at 1,0 {
>> 		reg = <3 0x00000000 0x04000000>;
>> 		compatible = "cfi-flash";
>> 		linux,mtd-name = "spansion,s29gl064n90t";
>> 		bank-width = <2>;
>>
>> 		gpmc,device-width = <1>;
> 
> Only bank-width should be necessary for NOR (per the binding
> documentation). However, if you do specify both, then they should match.
> Do you have two 8-bits devices? If so may be I need to update the
> documentation to make it clear this is the total width of all devices
> for a given chip-select.

No ... that was wrong, so I've fixed that.

<snip>

>> Booting with this NOR device produces the following oops:-
>>
>> [    0.000000] Booting Linux on physical CPU 0x0
>> [    0.000000] Linux version 3.9.0-rc1-12191-ga00d6d1-dirty (mpfj at mpfj-nanobone) (gcc version 4.5.4 (Buildroot 2012.11) ) #33 Tue Mar 5 13:08:25 GMT 2013
>> [    0.000000] CPU: ARMv7 Processor [413fc082] revision 2 (ARMv7), cr=10c53c7d

<snip>

>> [    0.236730] omap-gpmc 50000000.gpmc: could not find pctldev for node /pinmux at 44e10800/gpmc_pins, deferring probe
>> [    0.236781] platform 50000000.gpmc: Driver omap-gpmc requests probe deferral
> 
> This look like your problem. I would figure out why this is failing and
> try again.

Hmmmm ... I get this even when I've no NOR device defined and the board boots up fine.

But I can see in physmap_of.c that the device gets registered without any call to
devm_pinctrl_get_select_default() and hence no probe deferring takes place is the
pinctrl device hasn't yet been started (which it hasn't).

Does probe deferral need adding to physmap_of.c, or should the pinctrl device really
be registered sooner ?

Cheers
Mark J.