From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: marc.zyngier@arm.com (Marc Zyngier) Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2013 14:25:14 +0000 Subject: [PATCH 06/29] arm64: KVM: fault injection into a guest In-Reply-To: <513F2BB9.80306@codeaurora.org> References: <1362455265-24165-1-git-send-email-marc.zyngier@arm.com> <1362455265-24165-7-git-send-email-marc.zyngier@arm.com> <513F2BB9.80306@codeaurora.org> Message-ID: <513F3ACA.7020002@arm.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On 12/03/13 13:20, Christopher Covington wrote: Hi Christopher, > I noticed you went through the trouble of defining several constants in an > earlier patch. Perhaps you could put them to use here? > > On 03/04/2013 10:47 PM, Marc Zyngier wrote: >> Implement the injection of a fault (undefined, data abort or >> prefetch abort) into a 64bit guest. >> >> Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier >> --- >> arch/arm64/kvm/inject_fault.c | 117 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >> 1 file changed, 117 insertions(+) >> create mode 100644 arch/arm64/kvm/inject_fault.c > > [...] > >> +static void inject_abt64(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, bool is_iabt, unsigned long addr) >> +{ >> + unsigned long cpsr = *vcpu_cpsr(vcpu); >> + int is_aarch32; >> + u32 esr = 0; >> + >> + is_aarch32 = vcpu_mode_is_32bit(vcpu); >> + >> + *vcpu_spsr(vcpu) = cpsr; >> + vcpu->arch.regs.elr_el1 = *vcpu_pc(vcpu); >> + >> + *vcpu_cpsr(vcpu) = PSR_MODE_EL1h | PSR_A_BIT | PSR_F_BIT | PSR_I_BIT; >> + *vcpu_pc(vcpu) = vcpu->arch.sys_regs[VBAR_EL1] + 0x200; >> + >> + vcpu->arch.sys_regs[FAR_EL1] = addr; >> + >> + /* >> + * Build an {i,d}abort, depending on the level and the >> + * instruction set. Report an external synchronous abort. >> + */ >> + if (kvm_vcpu_trap_il_is32bit(vcpu)) >> + esr |= (1 << 25); > > ESR_EL2_IL This is the illustration of what I was saying earlier about confusing levels. Here, we're dealing with the guest's EL1. Using the _EL2 define is semantically wrong, even if it has the same value. > >> + if (is_aarch32 || (cpsr & PSR_MODE_MASK) == PSR_MODE_EL0t) >> + esr |= (0x20 << 26); > > ESR_EL2_EC_IABT << ESR_EL2_EC_SHIFT > >> + else >> + esr |= (0x21 << 26); > > ESR_EL2_EC_IABT_HYP << ESR_EL2_EC_SHIFT Even worse here. What this actually mean is "Exception@the current level", which is EL1. Having _HYP here is completely misleading. Now, maybe I should review all these defines and give them a more general meaning. Then we'd be able to share the defines across levels (arm/arch64/kernel/entry.S could use some defines too...). But overall, I'm quite reluctant to start mixing ESR_EL1 and ESR_EL2. >> + >> + if (!is_iabt) >> + esr |= (1 << 28); > > ESR_EL2_EC_DABT << ESR_EL2_EC_SHIFT Nasty. Works, but very nasty... ;-) >> + >> + vcpu->arch.sys_regs[ESR_EL1] = esr | 0x10; >> +} >> + >> +static void inject_undef64(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) >> +{ >> + unsigned long cpsr = *vcpu_cpsr(vcpu); >> + u32 esr = 0; >> + >> + *vcpu_spsr(vcpu) = cpsr; >> + vcpu->arch.regs.elr_el1 = *vcpu_pc(vcpu); >> + >> + *vcpu_cpsr(vcpu) = PSR_MODE_EL1h | PSR_F_BIT | PSR_I_BIT; >> + *vcpu_pc(vcpu) = vcpu->arch.sys_regs[VBAR_EL1] + 0x200; >> + >> + /* >> + * Build an unknown exception, depending on the instruction >> + * set. >> + */ >> + if (kvm_vcpu_trap_il_is32bit(vcpu)) >> + esr |= (1 << 25); > > ESR_EL2_IL > >> + >> + vcpu->arch.sys_regs[ESR_EL1] = esr; >> +} Thanks for reviewing, M. -- Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny...