From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: cov@codeaurora.org (Christopher Covington)
Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2013 13:31:05 -0400
Subject: [PATCH 14/29] arm64: KVM: guest one-reg interface
In-Reply-To: <1362455265-24165-15-git-send-email-marc.zyngier@arm.com>
References: <1362455265-24165-1-git-send-email-marc.zyngier@arm.com>
 <1362455265-24165-15-git-send-email-marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Message-ID: <513F6659.7060500@codeaurora.org>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org

Hi Marc,

On 03/04/2013 10:47 PM, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> Let userspace play with the guest registers.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
> ---
>  arch/arm64/kvm/guest.c | 240 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 240 insertions(+)
>  create mode 100644 arch/arm64/kvm/guest.c

[...]

> +int __attribute_const__ kvm_target_cpu(void)
> +{
> +	unsigned long implementor = read_cpuid_implementor();
> +	unsigned long part_number = read_cpuid_part_number();
> +
> +	if (implementor != ARM_CPU_IMP_ARM)
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +
> +	switch (part_number) {
> +	case ARM_CPU_PART_AEM_V8:
> +	case ARM_CPU_PART_FOUNDATION:
> +		/* Treat the models just as an A57 for the time being */
> +	case ARM_CPU_PART_CORTEX_A57:
> +		return KVM_ARM_TARGET_CORTEX_A57;
> +	default:
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +	}
> +}

What is the motivation behind these checks? Why not let any ARMv8 system that
has EL2 host a virtualized Cortex A57 guest?

[...]

Thanks,
Christopher

-- 
Employee of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, hosted by
the Linux Foundation