linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Philippe CORNU <philippe.cornu@st.com>
To: Yannick FERTRE <yannick.fertre@st.com>,
	Benjamin GAIGNARD <benjamin.gaignard@st.com>,
	Vincent ABRIOU <vincent.abriou@st.com>,
	"David Airlie" <airlied@linux.ie>,
	Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	Maxime Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32@gmail.com>,
	Alexandre TORGUE <alexandre.torgue@st.com>,
	"dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org"
	<dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>,
	"devicetree@vger.kernel.org" <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com"
	<linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] drm/stm: dsi: add support of an optional regulator
Date: Mon, 13 May 2019 11:21:44 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <514ab93f-ba2e-2799-003d-2cb484079c56@st.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <c1a7f401-a736-8145-2732-c7eea881ba37@st.com>

Hi Yannick,


On 5/10/19 6:16 PM, Philippe Cornu wrote:
> Dear Yannick,
> Thank you for your patch,
> 
> I like better the new shorter commit heading, thank you.
> 
> 
> On 5/10/19 4:20 PM, Yannick Fertré wrote:
>> Add support of an optional regulator for the phy part of the DSI
>> controller.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Yannick Fertré <yannick.fertre@st.com>
>> ---
>>   drivers/gpu/drm/stm/dw_mipi_dsi-stm.c | 45 
>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
>>   1 file changed, 39 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/stm/dw_mipi_dsi-stm.c 
>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/stm/dw_mipi_dsi-stm.c
>> index 1bef73e..22bd095 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/stm/dw_mipi_dsi-stm.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/stm/dw_mipi_dsi-stm.c
>> @@ -9,6 +9,7 @@
>>   #include <linux/clk.h>
>>   #include <linux/iopoll.h>
>>   #include <linux/module.h>
>> +#include <linux/regulator/consumer.h>
>>   #include <drm/drmP.h>
>>   #include <drm/drm_mipi_dsi.h>
>>   #include <drm/bridge/dw_mipi_dsi.h>
>> @@ -76,6 +77,7 @@ struct dw_mipi_dsi_stm {
>>       u32 hw_version;
>>       int lane_min_kbps;
>>       int lane_max_kbps;
>> +    struct regulator *vdd_supply;
>>   };
>>   static inline void dsi_write(struct dw_mipi_dsi_stm *dsi, u32 reg, 
>> u32 val)
>> @@ -318,17 +320,31 @@ static int dw_mipi_dsi_stm_probe(struct 
>> platform_device *pdev)
>>           return PTR_ERR(dsi->base);
>>       }
>> +    dsi->vdd_supply = devm_regulator_get_optional(dev, "phy-dsi");
>> +    if (IS_ERR(dsi->vdd_supply)) {
>> +        ret = PTR_ERR(dsi->vdd_supply);
>> +        if (ret != -EPROBE_DEFER)
>> +            DRM_ERROR("failed to request regulator: %d\n", ret);
>> +        return ret;
>> +    }


I did more tests on a stm32f469 disco board and this above code does not 
work (the ret value is -ENODEV)

Two possibilities then:
1) remove the _optional (but we have the "using dummy regulator" 
message, I am fine with it)

or
2) handle -ENODEV but do not forget to check vdd_supply!=NULL before 
calling all regulator_(enable/disable)

	if (ret != -ENODEV) {
		if (ret != -EPROBE_DEFER)
			DRM_ERROR("failed to request regulator: %d\n",
				ret);
			return ret;
		}
		dsi->vdd_supply = NULL;
	}

	if (dsi->vdd_supply) {
		ret = regulator_enable(dsi->vdd_supply);
		...


	if (dsi->vdd_supply)
		regulator_disable(dsi->vdd_supply);


I let you choose your favorite one.

Thank you,
Philippe

>> +
>> +    ret = regulator_enable(dsi->vdd_supply);
>> +    if (ret) {
>> +        DRM_ERROR("failed to enable regulator: %d\n", ret);
>> +        return ret;
>> +    }
>> +
>>       dsi->pllref_clk = devm_clk_get(dev, "ref");
>>       if (IS_ERR(dsi->pllref_clk)) {
>>           ret = PTR_ERR(dsi->pllref_clk);
>> -        dev_err(dev, "Unable to get pll reference clock: %d\n", ret);
>> -        return ret;
>> +        DRM_ERROR("Unable to get pll reference clock: %d\n", ret);
>> +        goto err_clk_get;
>>       }
>>       ret = clk_prepare_enable(dsi->pllref_clk);
>>       if (ret) {
>> -        dev_err(dev, "%s: Failed to enable pllref_clk\n", __func__);
>> -        return ret;
>> +        DRM_ERROR("%s: Failed to enable pllref_clk\n", __func__);
>> +        goto err_clk_get;
>>       }
>>       dw_mipi_dsi_stm_plat_data.base = dsi->base;
>> @@ -339,11 +355,19 @@ static int dw_mipi_dsi_stm_probe(struct 
>> platform_device *pdev)
>>       dsi->dsi = dw_mipi_dsi_probe(pdev, &dw_mipi_dsi_stm_plat_data);
>>       if (IS_ERR(dsi->dsi)) {
>>           DRM_ERROR("Failed to initialize mipi dsi host\n");
>> -        clk_disable_unprepare(dsi->pllref_clk);
>> -        return PTR_ERR(dsi->dsi);
>> +        ret = PTR_ERR(dsi->dsi);
>> +        goto err_dsi_probe;
>>       }
>>       return 0;
>> +
>> +err_dsi_probe:
>> +    clk_disable_unprepare(dsi->pllref_clk);
>> +err_clk_get:
>> +    regulator_disable(dsi->vdd_supply);
>> +
>> +    return ret;
>> +
>>   }
>>   static int dw_mipi_dsi_stm_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
>> @@ -351,6 +375,7 @@ static int dw_mipi_dsi_stm_remove(struct 
>> platform_device *pdev)
>>       struct dw_mipi_dsi_stm *dsi = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
>>       clk_disable_unprepare(dsi->pllref_clk);
>> +    regulator_disable(dsi->vdd_supply);
>>       dw_mipi_dsi_remove(dsi->dsi);
> 
> for a future patch: we may have a different order
>      dw_mipi_dsi_remove(dsi->dsi);
>      clk_disable_unprepare(dsi->pllref_clk);
>      regulator_disable(dsi->vdd_supply);
> 
>>       return 0;
>> @@ -363,6 +388,7 @@ static int __maybe_unused 
>> dw_mipi_dsi_stm_suspend(struct device *dev)
>>       DRM_DEBUG_DRIVER("\n");
>>       clk_disable_unprepare(dsi->pllref_clk);
>> +    regulator_disable(dsi->vdd_supply);
>>       return 0;
>>   }
>> @@ -370,9 +396,16 @@ static int __maybe_unused 
>> dw_mipi_dsi_stm_suspend(struct device *dev)
>>   static int __maybe_unudw_mipi_dsi_remove(dsi->dsi);sed 
>> dw_mipi_dsi_stm_resume(struct device *dev)
>>   {
>>       struct dw_mipi_dsi_stm *dsi = dw_mipi_dsi_stm_plat_data.priv_data;
>> +    int ret;
>>       DRM_DEBUG_DRIVER("\n");
>> +    ret = regulator_enable(dsi->vdd_supply);
>> +    if (ret) {
>> +        DRM_ERROR("failed to enable regulator: %d\n", ret);
>> +        return ret;
>> +    }
>> +
>>       clk_prepare_enable(dsi->pllref_clk);
> 
> for a future patch: we may check clk_prepare_enable return value.
> 
>>       return 0;
>>
> 
> 
> Acked-by: Philippe Cornu <philippe.cornu@st.com>
> 
> Philippe :)
> 
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

  reply	other threads:[~2019-05-13 11:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-05-10 14:20 [PATCH v2 0/5] Add supply property for DSI controller Yannick Fertré
2019-05-10 14:20 ` [PATCH v2 1/5] dt-bindings: display: stm32: add supply property to " Yannick Fertré
2019-05-10 15:59   ` Philippe CORNU
2019-05-14 20:03   ` Rob Herring
2019-05-10 14:20 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] drm/stm: dsi: add support of an optional regulator Yannick Fertré
2019-05-10 16:16   ` Philippe CORNU
2019-05-13 11:21     ` Philippe CORNU [this message]
2019-05-10 14:20 ` [PATCH v2 3/5] ARM: dts: stm32: add phy-dsi-supply property on stm32mp157c Yannick Fertré
2019-05-10 16:18   ` Philippe CORNU
2019-08-02  9:01   ` Yannick FERTRE
2019-05-10 14:20 ` [PATCH v2 4/5] ARM: dts: stm32: move fixe regulators reg11 & reg18 Yannick Fertré
2019-08-02  9:02   ` Yannick FERTRE
2019-05-10 14:20 ` [PATCH v2 5/5] ARM: dts: stm32: remove phy-dsi-supply property on stm32mp157c-dk2 board Yannick Fertré
2019-08-02  9:02   ` Yannick FERTRE

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=514ab93f-ba2e-2799-003d-2cb484079c56@st.com \
    --to=philippe.cornu@st.com \
    --cc=airlied@linux.ie \
    --cc=alexandre.torgue@st.com \
    --cc=benjamin.gaignard@st.com \
    --cc=daniel@ffwll.ch \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=mcoquelin.stm32@gmail.com \
    --cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=vincent.abriou@st.com \
    --cc=yannick.fertre@st.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).