From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.4 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, NICE_REPLY_A,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7257BC4338F for ; Mon, 26 Jul 2021 12:08:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2E879604DC for ; Mon, 26 Jul 2021 12:08:55 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 mail.kernel.org 2E879604DC Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=arm.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender:Content-Type: Content-Transfer-Encoding:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post:List-Archive: List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Date:Message-ID:From: References:Cc:To:Subject:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=iY2Ac/qajRJBFF1yY9MOjKx5xAtWYOLPyycv4qYA3XQ=; b=0UhFI1ovmYP3Q/XyvhKrbebsVV km7rVgoYwB5lBos/cuNlw72eokMC42xcOf8KytlW7UibXXe/auNGXb+1zLMouQHTHbq7OU1PI2d7b x76dZ4HkIoiaWzmKX14zrxm+FVS9fr9C/I73RDRRF8iYMLg6zbh48sLUccsbKwnN0GQLQ5LSjDRtG Kjw4zHliIYd7plbG9dG8LZ3+BvVtuJjH6Fb5UCyYKhVJnGJTB7AKYDvJu3ul2FkGfESiknh9exm1N YdRCJ2b/S+UuP9UT2kmqMYiYq1jdSk5y6DOccSiF70TFQ4M+D1GdnIDvMxPwd72lyaifvvPWYNNZA wxnLPMaA==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1m7zNn-00B6cX-Fn; Mon, 26 Jul 2021 12:06:55 +0000 Received: from foss.arm.com ([217.140.110.172]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1m7zNk-00B6bx-8N for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Mon, 26 Jul 2021 12:06:53 +0000 Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AADC631B; Mon, 26 Jul 2021 05:06:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [10.57.36.146] (unknown [10.57.36.146]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4F3BD3F70D; Mon, 26 Jul 2021 05:06:47 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/23] iommu: Refactor DMA domain strictness To: John Garry , joro@8bytes.org, will@kernel.org Cc: iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com, baolu.lu@linux.intel.com, dianders@chromium.org References: <8e9da41e-4e3a-7098-bece-7f6cba89a2aa@huawei.com> From: Robin Murphy Message-ID: <519d4a00-a251-3437-6c3e-6ee3e75bf64c@arm.com> Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2021 13:06:41 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.12.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <8e9da41e-4e3a-7098-bece-7f6cba89a2aa@huawei.com> Content-Language: en-GB X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20210726_050652_402925_A7AEC9E6 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 17.12 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On 2021-07-26 09:13, John Garry wrote: > On 21/07/2021 19:20, Robin Murphy wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> First off, yes, this conflicts with just about everything else >> currently in-flight. Sorry about that. If it stands up to initial review >> then I'll start giving some thought to how to fit everything together >> (particularly John's cleanup of strictness defaults, which I'd be >> inclined to fold into a v2 of this series). > > It seems to me that patch #20 is the only real conflict, and that is > just a different form of mine in that passthrough, strict, and lazy are > under a single choice, as opposed to passthrough being a separate config > (for mine). And on that point, I did assume that we would have a > different sysfs file for strict vs lazy in this series, and not a new > domain type. But I assume that there is a good reason for that. Yes, as mentioned by patch #18 it helps a surprising number of things fall into place really neatly. > Anyway, I'd really like to see my series just merged now. Sure, I was going to say I can happily rebase on top of your series as-is if Joerg wants to apply it first, and now that's just happened :) Cheers, Robin. _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel