From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: nicolas.ferre@atmel.com (Nicolas Ferre) Date: Wed, 5 Jun 2013 12:04:26 +0200 Subject: [PATCH v2 0/7] pcmcia: at91_cf: clean up and add DT support In-Reply-To: <20130419225448.GA8242@kroah.com> References: <516E628B.1000104@atmel.com> <20130419225448.GA8242@kroah.com> Message-ID: <51AF0D2A.2@atmel.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On 20/04/2013 00:54, Greg Kroah-Hartman : > On Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 10:51:23AM +0200, Nicolas Ferre wrote: >> On 04/17/2013 10:39 AM, Fabio Porcedda : >>> On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 12:40 PM, Nicolas Ferre wrote: >>>> These patches clean up at91_cf a bit and add DT bindings. >>>> It is based on a previous series from Joachim Eastwood and other cleanup >>>> patches by Fabio and Laurent. >>>> I have collected them together as they are lying around for some time. >>>> >>>> Please tell me if It can go through PCMCIA tree or if Andrew or Greg can >>>> take them. >>>> Note that they are not bug fixes, so you can stack them for 3.10. >>>> >>>> Thanks for your help, best regards. >>>> >>>> v2: add 2 more cleanup patches: >>>> - move to module_platform_driver_probe() >>>> - little trivial indentation fix >>>> >>>> Fabio Porcedda (1): >>>> pcmcia: at91_cf: use module_platform_driver_probe() >>>> >>>> Joachim Eastwood (5): >>>> pcmcia: at91_cf: fix gpio_get_value in at91_cf_get_status >>>> pcmcia: at91_cf: convert to dev_ print functions >>>> pcmcia: at91_cf: use devm_ functions for allocations >>>> pcmcia: at91_cf: clean up header includes >>>> pcmcia: at91_cf: add support for DT >>>> >>>> Laurent Navet (1): >>>> pcmcia/trivial: at91_cf: fix checkpatch error >>>> >>>> .../devicetree/bindings/ata/atmel-at91_cf.txt | 19 +++ >>>> drivers/pcmcia/Kconfig | 2 +- >>>> drivers/pcmcia/at91_cf.c | 176 ++++++++++----------- >>>> 3 files changed, 108 insertions(+), 89 deletions(-) >>>> create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/ata/atmel-at91_cf.txt >>>> >>>> -- >>>> 1.8.0 >>>> >>> >>> Ping? >> >> Andrew, Greg, can you please take this series? >> >> Here is the post on lkml: >> https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/3/21/246 >> >> Here is the first patch in patchwork (1/7): >> https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/2312691/ >> >> Tell me if I can do something else to make this applied upstream... > > The PCMCIA maintainer should take these, not me. I know Greg, but this patch series is still not taken by anyone 3 months after its first submission and after several requests by both Fabio and myself... The series is still applying on linux-next today... Maybe it can go via Andrew, then... Best regards, -- Nicolas Ferre