From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: daniel.thompson@linaro.org (Daniel Thompson) Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2014 16:58:00 +0100 Subject: [PATCH v6 1/4] arm: fiq: Add callbacks to manage FIQ routings In-Reply-To: References: <1403174303-25456-1-git-send-email-daniel.thompson@linaro.org> <1403623097-1153-1-git-send-email-daniel.thompson@linaro.org> <1403623097-1153-2-git-send-email-daniel.thompson@linaro.org> Message-ID: <53A9A008.6060301@linaro.org> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On 24/06/14 16:44, Nicolas Pitre wrote: > On Tue, 24 Jun 2014, Daniel Thompson wrote: > >> Currently enable_fiq/disable_fiq use a simple offset to convert an IRQ >> virq into a FIQ virq. This is too inflexible for multi-platform kernels >> and makes runtime error checking impossible. >> >> We solve this by introducing a flexible mapping that allows interrupt >> controllers that support FIQ to register those mappings. This, in turn, >> makes it much possible for drivers in DT kernels to install FIQ handlers >> without knowing anything about the interrupt controller. >> >> Signed-off-by: Daniel Thompson >> Cc: Russell King >> Cc: Fabio Estevam >> Cc: Nicolas Pitre >> --- >> arch/arm/include/asm/fiq.h | 7 +++ >> arch/arm/kernel/fiq.c | 103 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++- >> 2 files changed, 108 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > [...] > >> +bool has_fiq(int fiq) >> +{ >> + struct fiq_data *data = lookup_fiq_data(fiq); >> + >> + if (data) >> + return true; >> + >> + if (fiq_start == -1) >> + return false; >> + >> + return fiq > fiq_start; > > Shouldn't this be fiq >= fiq_start ? Absolutely! Will fix that shortly. Thanks Daniel.