From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: kgene.kim@samsung.com (Kukjin Kim) Date: Sun, 13 Jul 2014 07:57:21 +0900 Subject: [PATCH 00/19] ARM: SAMSUNG: S5PV210 platform clean-up In-Reply-To: <12714831.uRzVr7yNEz@wuerfel> References: <1404496099-26708-1-git-send-email-t.figa@samsung.com> <12714831.uRzVr7yNEz@wuerfel> Message-ID: <53C1BD51.9020500@samsung.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On 07/05/14 05:15, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > On Friday 04 July 2014 19:48:00 Tomasz Figa wrote: >> This huge series is a (hopefully final) attempt to convert Samsung S5PV210 >> into a DT-only and multiplatform-aware platform. It consists of several >> steps to gradually replace legacy code with one meeting current standards >> and then finally remove unused remnants. >> >> Patches 1-6 migrate the platform to fully use the Common Clock Framework >> and get rid of legacy private clock code, of which s5pv210 was the last >> user. Then patch 7 adds generic PHY driver for USB PHY on S5PV210 to allow >> USB to be supported when using DT. Further three patches (8-10) add DT >> support for mach-s5pv210 and necessary DT sources for currently supported >> boards. Patch 11 removes board files and code directly related to them, >> effectively making s5pv210 a DT-only platform. In next step, patches 12-15 >> prepare remaining code for multiplatform enablement, which is finally done >> in patch 16. Patches 17-19 are a final clean-up, which remove a lot of >> unused code left after making the last S5P platform DT-only. >> >> Build tested patch by patch on following configs: >> - s3c2410_defconfig (with DT support enabled), >> - s3c6400_defconfig (with DT support enabled), >> - s5pv210_defconfig (with DT support enabled after patches adding it), >> - exynos_defconfig, >> - exynos_defconfig with S5PV210 enabled in multiplatform configuration. >> >> Boot tested on s5pv210-goni board. >> >> Note that support for smdkc110, smdkv210 and torbreck boards is provided >> by moving data from existing board files to new device tree sources. No >> testing was performed due to mentioned board not being available anymore. >> However I believe we agreed on this approach, because apparently there >> are no active users of them. See the RFC from August 2013 asking for >> removal of the whole platform [1]. >> >> [1] http://www.mail-archive.com/linux-samsung-soc%40vger.kernel.org/msg21882.html >> >> > Great work, everything > > Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann > > I hope we can get this into linux-next soon so we can do some more > cleanups on top. Sorry for a little bit late applying, I just wanted to get ack from driver maintainers but... anyway I'll apply this series so you may see this on Monday in -next :) Tomasz, many thanks for your effort and time. - Kukjin