From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: skannan@codeaurora.org (Saravana Kannan) Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2014 14:45:21 -0700 Subject: [PATCH v3 1/2] cpufreq: Don't destroy/realloc policy/sysfs on hotplug/suspend In-Reply-To: <53C6DFAD.8030109@codeaurora.org> References: <1405464473-3916-1-git-send-email-skannan@codeaurora.org> <1405464473-3916-2-git-send-email-skannan@codeaurora.org> <53C6DFAD.8030109@codeaurora.org> Message-ID: <53C6F271.6070707@codeaurora.org> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On 07/16/2014 01:25 PM, Saravana Kannan wrote: > On 07/16/2014 01:24 AM, Viresh Kumar wrote: >> On 16 July 2014 04:17, Saravana Kannan wrote: >>> diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c >> >>> @@ -1110,9 +1092,10 @@ static int __cpufreq_add_dev(struct device >>> *dev, struct subsys_interface *sif) >>> >>> #ifdef CONFIG_SMP >>> /* check whether a different CPU already registered this >>> - * CPU because it is in the same boat. */ >>> + * CPU because it is one of the related CPUs. */ >>> policy = cpufreq_cpu_get(cpu); >>> - if (unlikely(policy)) { >>> + if (policy) { >>> + cpufreq_change_policy_cpus(policy, cpu, true); >> >> This is just a waste of time at boot as ... (see below) > > Why? Please explain. > Nevermind. Figured what you meant. I just need to improve the "if" check. -Saravana -- The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation