linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: list-09_linux_arm@tqsc.de (Markus Niebel)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [[RFC PATCH]] gpio: gpio-mxc: make sure gpio is input when request IRQ
Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2014 14:52:05 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <53D252F5.2060601@tqsc.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CACRpkdarH_-2uW55C5bAUxM1ESgSb6tJAWc4UqEoWr8uc_kQRQ@mail.gmail.com>

Am 25.07.2014 13:38, wrote Linus Walleij:
> On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 10:12 AM, Markus Niebel
> <list-09_linux_arm@tqsc.de> wrote:
>> Am 23.07.2014 18:14, wrote Linus Walleij:
> 
>>> So always prepare the hardware and make it ready for action in respective
>>> callbacks from the GPIO and irqchip APIs. Do not rely on gpiod_to_irq() having
>>> been called first.
>>>
>>
>> So a gpio driver is responsible to read status of gpio lines and flag any gpio line
>> currently configured as out (base on the information read from hardware registers)
>> on driver probe time - correct?
> 
> I don't think anyone reads that information explicitly to set up
> these flags.
> 
> Drivers just leave the pins in their power-on maiden state without
> trying to figure out how they're set-up. But as you say, if you call
> gpiod_get_direction() on them, the flag gets set up indeed.
> 
> So usually these flags are set by code, calling
> gpiod_[get/set]_direction().
> Then they do get flagged as outputs or inputs.
> 
>> If yes is the driver allowed to call
>> gpiod_get_direction() to have the FLAG_IS_OUT set in the gpiolib layer?
> 
> I don't know if it'd be a good idea to loop over all gpios in a new
> irqchip and fetch the direction just to get the flags right, so far
> we haven't done that and I don't know what the usecase would be.
> 

I've came to a situation where it would have been helpful to know - bootloader
configured a pin as output and linux tried to configure the pin as IRQ input.
*YES I KNOW THIS IS NOT CORRECT* but it took some time to see, what happened.

> If we need that we should do it in gpiolib for all drivers don't you
> think?

A pragmatic / lean solution would be to deny the IRQ configuration when
seeing the pin configured as output in hardware and print out an error
on the gpio driver level.

> 
> But then we need a rationale for doing it, other than it's nice :-)
> It is already called on-the-fly by debugfs when a user needs that
> info.

See above, I think an error on a misconfigured system would be enough.
Maybe the documentation for gpio drivers should have a hint for driver
implementors.

So first step would be to convert the driver to the irqchip helper and then
add calls to gpiod_[un]lock_as_irq at the right places.

Will try to do that after my holiday.

> 
> Yours,
> Linus Walleij
> 
Yours,

Markus Niebel

  reply	other threads:[~2014-07-25 12:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-07-16 13:51 [[RFC PATCH]] gpio: gpio-mxc: make sure gpio is input when request IRQ Markus Niebel
2014-07-22  6:28 ` Shawn Guo
2014-07-22  7:19   ` Markus Niebel
2014-07-22  7:42     ` Shawn Guo
2014-07-23 16:14       ` Linus Walleij
2014-07-24  8:12         ` Markus Niebel
2014-07-25 11:38           ` Linus Walleij
2014-07-25 12:52             ` Markus Niebel [this message]
2014-07-25 13:52               ` Linus Walleij
2014-07-23 16:10 ` Linus Walleij

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=53D252F5.2060601@tqsc.de \
    --to=list-09_linux_arm@tqsc.de \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).