From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: collinsd@codeaurora.org (David Collins)
Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2014 15:23:29 -0700
Subject: [PATCH v3 2/4] mfd: pm8xxx-spmi: document DT bindings for Qualcomm
 SPMI PMICs
In-Reply-To: <1406205921-7452-3-git-send-email-svarbanov@mm-sol.com>
References: <1406205921-7452-1-git-send-email-svarbanov@mm-sol.com>
 <1406205921-7452-3-git-send-email-svarbanov@mm-sol.com>
Message-ID: <53D81EE1.7040309@codeaurora.org>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org

On 07/24/2014 05:45 AM, Stanimir Varbanov wrote:
> Document DT bindings used to describe the Qualcomm SPMI PMICs.
> Currently the SPMI PMICs supported are pm8941, pm8841 and pma8084.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Stanimir Varbanov <svarbanov@mm-sol.com>

(...)
> +Required properties for peripheral child nodes:
> +- compatible:      Should contain "qcom,pm8xxx-xxx", where "xxx" is
> +                   peripheral name. The "pm8xxx" can be any of supported PMICs,
> +                   see example below.

I don't think that this binding document should be imposing any formatting
restrictions on the compatible strings for QPNP peripheral drivers.  The
QPNP peripheral drivers in the downstream msm-3.10 tree [1] do not specify
per-PMIC compatible strings.  This is because ideally, a given QPNP
peripheral represents a hardware block that is identical in interface and
operation between PMICs.

These peripheral drivers determine the base address for a given device
instance via device tree reg and reg-names properties.  In order for this
to continue to work with the pm8xxx-spmi driver, some mechanism will need
to be introduced which creates resource structs for the
non-memory-mappable SPMI base addresses.  One possible solution is
currently being discussed in another thread [2].  This document will need
to be updated to show the child node reg property scheme once a solution
is reached.

(...)
> +Example:
> +
> +	pm8941 at 0 {
> +		compatible = "qcom,pm8941";
> +		reg = <0x0 SPMI_USID>;
> +
> +		rtc {
> +			compatible = "qcom,pm8941-rtc";
> +			interrupts = <0x0 0x61 0x1 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING>;
> +			interrupt-names = "alarm";
> +		};
> +	};

Can you please expand your example to include the second SID for the
PM8941 chip?  That way, it will be clear that each PMIC needs two DT
nodes; one for each SID.

Thanks,
David Collins

[1]: https://www.codeaurora.org/cgit/quic/la/kernel/msm-3.10/tree/?h=msm-3.10

[2]: https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/7/29/252

-- 
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
hosted by The Linux Foundation