From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: caesar.wang@rock-chips.com (caesar)
Date: Thu, 07 Aug 2014 09:27:33 +0800
Subject: [PATCH v4 2/2] pwm: rockchip: Added to support for RK3288 SoC
In-Reply-To: <CAD=FV=V4Kp-H3CcAKZPV1jBnYX+Ntwvxx6RB13TLxS5RRPHTWA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <1406197295-10604-1-git-send-email-caesar.wang@rock-chips.com>	<1406197295-10604-3-git-send-email-caesar.wang@rock-chips.com>
 <CAD=FV=V4Kp-H3CcAKZPV1jBnYX+Ntwvxx6RB13TLxS5RRPHTWA@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <53E2D605.2000704@rock-chips.com>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org

Doug,

? 2014?08?07? 06:46, Doug Anderson ??:
> Caesar,
>
> On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 3:21 AM, Caesar Wang <caesar.wang@rock-chips.com> wrote:
>> +static const struct rockchip_pwm_data pwm_data_v1 = {
>> +       .regs.duty = PWM_HRC,
>> +       .regs.period = PWM_LRC,
>> +       .regs.cntr = PWM_CNTR,
>> +       .regs.ctrl = PWM_CTRL,
>> +       .prescaler = PRESCALER,
>> +       .set_enable = rockchip_pwm_set_enable_v1,
>> +};
>> +
>> +static const struct rockchip_pwm_data pwm_data_v2 = {
>> +       .regs.duty = PWM_LRC,
>> +       .regs.period = PWM_HRC,
>> +       .regs.cntr = PWM_CNTR,
>> +       .regs.ctrl = PWM_CTRL,
>> +       .prescaler = PRESCALER-1,
>> +       .set_enable = rockchip_pwm_set_enable_v2,
>> +};
>> +
>> +static const struct rockchip_pwm_data pwm_data_vop = {
>> +       .regs.duty = PWM_LRC,
>> +       .regs.period = PWM_HRC,
>> +       .regs.cntr = PWM_CTRL,
>> +       .regs.ctrl = PWM_CNTR,
> Did you really mean to flip CTRL and CNTR here?  If so, that's super
> confusing and deserves a comment.  AKA, I think the above should not
> be:
>
>   +       .regs.cntr = PWM_CTRL,
>   +       .regs.ctrl = PWM_CNTR,
>
> ...but should be
>
>   +       .regs.cntr = PWM_CNTR,
>   +       .regs.ctrl = PWM_CTRL,
>
> If you didn't mean to flip CTRL and CNTR here, then just get rid of
> pwm_data_vop and refer to pwm_data_v2.  In fact, I'd suggest that you
> totally remove the "rockchip,vop-pwm" since there's nothing different
> between "rockchip,rk3288-pwm" and "rockchip,vop-pwm".

Sorry,I think it's no problem. the  "rockchip,rk3288-pwm" and 
"rockchip,vop-pwm" are seperate PWM controllers.
They are just different registers address between CNTR and CTRL .

>
> Have you validated Thierry's suggestion to allow you to access your
> memory range?
Yes,we have solve it in lcdc driver.
The Mark Yao have the  submission in [0].

[0]: https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/8/4/20
>
> -Doug
>
>
>