From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: caesar.wang@rock-chips.com (caesar)
Date: Thu, 07 Aug 2014 11:37:21 +0800
Subject: [PATCH v4 2/2] pwm: rockchip: Added to support for RK3288 SoC
In-Reply-To: <CAD=FV=Wuj2_q+iW2EAj7w8TvgS=C2juSu+h_iG24NvPk4UqhKQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <1406197295-10604-1-git-send-email-caesar.wang@rock-chips.com>	<1406197295-10604-3-git-send-email-caesar.wang@rock-chips.com>	<CAD=FV=V4Kp-H3CcAKZPV1jBnYX+Ntwvxx6RB13TLxS5RRPHTWA@mail.gmail.com>	<53E2D605.2000704@rock-chips.com>	<CAD=FV=Xw8tz2keCUtO+qYUmnuv=+DPGZjY9-j_2XmAcP3Luzjg@mail.gmail.com>	<53E2F11A.1040109@rock-chips.com>
 <CAD=FV=Wuj2_q+iW2EAj7w8TvgS=C2juSu+h_iG24NvPk4UqhKQ@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <53E2F471.6020701@rock-chips.com>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org

Doug,

? 2014?08?07? 11:26, Doug Anderson ??:
> caesar,
>
> On Wed, Aug 6, 2014 at 8:23 PM, caesar <caesar.wang@rock-chips.com> wrote:
>> ? 2014?08?07? 10:16, Doug Anderson ??:
>>
>>> Caesar,
>>>
>>> On Wed, Aug 6, 2014 at 6:27 PM, caesar <caesar.wang@rock-chips.com> wrote:
>>>> Doug,
>>>>
>>>> ? 2014?08?07? 06:46, Doug Anderson ??:
>>>>
>>>>> Caesar,
>>>>>
>>>>> On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 3:21 AM, Caesar Wang
>>>>> <caesar.wang@rock-chips.com>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>> +static const struct rockchip_pwm_data pwm_data_v1 = {
>>>>>> +       .regs.duty = PWM_HRC,
>>>>>> +       .regs.period = PWM_LRC,
>>>>>> +       .regs.cntr = PWM_CNTR,
>>>>>> +       .regs.ctrl = PWM_CTRL,
>>>>>> +       .prescaler = PRESCALER,
>>>>>> +       .set_enable = rockchip_pwm_set_enable_v1,
>>>>>> +};
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> +static const struct rockchip_pwm_data pwm_data_v2 = {
>>>>>> +       .regs.duty = PWM_LRC,
>>>>>> +       .regs.period = PWM_HRC,
>>>>>> +       .regs.cntr = PWM_CNTR,
>>>>>> +       .regs.ctrl = PWM_CTRL,
>>>>>> +       .prescaler = PRESCALER-1,
>>>>>> +       .set_enable = rockchip_pwm_set_enable_v2,
>>>>>> +};
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> +static const struct rockchip_pwm_data pwm_data_vop = {
>>>>>> +       .regs.duty = PWM_LRC,
>>>>>> +       .regs.period = PWM_HRC,
>>>>>> +       .regs.cntr = PWM_CTRL,
>>>>>> +       .regs.ctrl = PWM_CNTR,
>>>>> Did you really mean to flip CTRL and CNTR here?  If so, that's super
>>>>> confusing and deserves a comment.  AKA, I think the above should not
>>>>> be:
>>>>>
>>>>>     +       .regs.cntr = PWM_CTRL,
>>>>>     +       .regs.ctrl = PWM_CNTR,
>>>>>
>>>>> ...but should be
>>>>>
>>>>>     +       .regs.cntr = PWM_CNTR,
>>>>>     +       .regs.ctrl = PWM_CTRL,
>>>>>
>>>>> If you didn't mean to flip CTRL and CNTR here, then just get rid of
>>>>> pwm_data_vop and refer to pwm_data_v2.  In fact, I'd suggest that you
>>>>> totally remove the "rockchip,vop-pwm" since there's nothing different
>>>>> between "rockchip,rk3288-pwm" and "rockchip,vop-pwm".
>>>>
>>>> Sorry,I think it's no problem. the  "rockchip,rk3288-pwm" and
>>>> "rockchip,vop-pwm" are seperate PWM controllers.
>>>> They are just different registers address between CNTR and CTRL .
>>> OK, I looked up in the TRM.  Right, the CNTR and CTRL are flipped on
>>> the vop.  So I think that the only change you need is to add:
>>>
>>> #define PWM_VOP_CTRL  0x00
>>> #define PWM_VOP_CNTR  0x0c
>>>
>>> ...then use these new #defines for the vop structure.
>>>
>>>
>>> As you have the code written right now it's very confusing.  The new
>>> #defines will fix this.
>>>
>> yeah, I think they can be used in the same context.
>>
>> I will fix it in patch v5 if it is really need.
> I think you should fix this, but if Thierry doesn't think so then it's
> really his decision.
I remember In patch v2 [1],Thierry suggests me to fix it so if I have no 
to get wrong.

[1]: https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/7/21/113
>
>