From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: javier.martinez@collabora.co.uk (Javier Martinez Canillas) Date: Fri, 03 Oct 2014 08:50:09 +0200 Subject: linux-next: build failure after merge of the arm-soc tree In-Reply-To: <14357384.nIoLZkacVq@wuerfel> References: <20141002113742.2b521495@canb.auug.org.au> <14357384.nIoLZkacVq@wuerfel> Message-ID: <542E4721.8040300@collabora.co.uk> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org Hello Arnd, Stephen, On 10/02/2014 04:32 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > On Thursday 02 October 2014 11:37:42 Stephen Rothwell wrote: >> After merging the arm-soc tree, today's linux-next build (arm >> multi_v7_defconfig) failed like this: >> >> arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5250-snow.dts:13:46: fatal error: dt-bindings/clock/maxim,max77686.h: No such file or directory >> #include >> ^ >> >> Caused by commit c04c92ed5614 ("ARM: dts: Add rtc_src clk for s3c-rtc >> on exynos5250-snow"). >> >> Presumably there is some dependency on some tree that someone has >> forgotten to merge >> >> I reverted that commit for today. >> >> Which then got to: >> >> /scratch/sfr/next/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5420-peach-pit.dts:15:46: fatal error: dt-bindings/clock/maxim,max77802.h: No such file or directory >> #include >> ^ >> compilation terminated. >> /scratch/sfr/next/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5800-peach-pi.dts:15:46: fatal error: dt-bindings/clock/maxim,max77802.h: No such file or directory >> #include >> ^ >> compilation terminated. >> Error: /scratch/sfr/next/arch/arm/boot/dts/hisi-x5hd2.dtsi:417.21-22 syntax error >> FATAL ERROR: Unable to parse input tree >> >> Caused by 8bd43b6e6df7 ("ARM: dts: Add rtc_src clk for s3c-rtc on >> exynos Peach boards"). >> >> I give up ... please test your trees better ... > > I'm deeply sorry about that. I actually saw the problem here but was too > tired to fix it up again by redoing all the merges in our next/late > branch. > I'm so sorry about the breakage, when I posted this patch I mentioned that it was meant for the 3.18-rc cycle once 3.18-rc1 was released [0]. Because it fixes a regression caused by a patch queued in the clock tree for 3.18. I should had been more explicit about the dependencies to avoid confusions. > I've changed the for-next branch now to drop all of next/late, I think > we're better off not sending any of it for 3.18, especially as I found > some other problems as well. > Do you think that it may be possible to send this for the 3.18-rc cycle or should it have to wait for 3.19? Without this the real time clock does not work on the Peach Chromebooks and your next/late branch contains other fixes as well (e.g: the Exynos USB dr_mode DT patches). >> I have used the arm-soc tree form next-20141001 for today (which still >> needs 5 reverts to get it to build :-(). > > D'oh. I actually fixed these already last friday in the next/dt branch > but for some reason forgot to include it in for-next. > I've made sure that everything is included now. > > Arnd > Thanks a lot and best regards, Javier [0]: https://www.mail-archive.com/linux-samsung-soc at vger.kernel.org/msg36702.html