From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: lyz@rock-chips.com (Yunzhi Li) Date: Fri, 15 May 2015 13:59:08 +0800 Subject: [PATCH 0/8] ARM: dts: rockchip: the big relicensing In-Reply-To: <1881847.GTHrUCPx3W@phil> References: <1425665046-22927-1-git-send-email-heiko@sntech.de> <1881847.GTHrUCPx3W@phil> Message-ID: <55558B2C.70406@rock-chips.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org Acked-by: Yunzhi Li > Hi Eddie and Rockchip people, > > Am Freitag, 6. M?rz 2015, 19:03:58 schrieb Heiko Stuebner: >> GPL2/X11 seems to be the consensus to go for devicetree files, as shown for >> examply by armada, meson and sunxi. > just to explain a bit more, this is helpful if other operating systems like > the BSDs want to share the devicetree files which are in any case supposed to > be operating-system-agnostic. > > > It looks like I got all needed external ACKs but am missing ACKs from some > Rockchip engineers who contributed to these files. > > Ideally the listed people could respond individually to the patches in their > mailboxes (from beginning of march) with an Acked-by tag. > > But as all of them are employed by Rockchip it should also be possible for > Eddie to Ack the change summarily on behalf of Rockchip if this is acceptable. > > >> ARM: dts: rockchip: relicense rk3288.dtsi under GPLv2/X11 > Addy Ke > Andy Yan > Chris Zhong > Jianqun Xu > Roger Chen > Yunzhi Li > huang lin > >> ARM: dts: rockchip: relicense rk3288-evb* under GPLv2/X11 > Chris Zhong > Roger Chen > Yunzhi Li > > > Thanks > Heiko > > >