From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: marc.zyngier@arm.com (Marc Zyngier) Date: Thu, 03 Sep 2015 09:18:45 +0100 Subject: [PATCH v2 1/4] of/pci: Add of_pci_check_probe_only to parse "linux, pci-probe-only" In-Reply-To: <20150902222325.GD829@google.com> References: <1439569159-10051-1-git-send-email-marc.zyngier@arm.com> <1439569159-10051-2-git-send-email-marc.zyngier@arm.com> <20150902222325.GD829@google.com> Message-ID: <55E80265.3050701@arm.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On 02/09/15 23:23, Bjorn Helgaas wrote: > On Fri, Aug 14, 2015 at 04:08:10PM -0500, Rob Herring wrote: >> On Fri, Aug 14, 2015 at 11:19 AM, Marc Zyngier wrote: >>> Both pci-host-generic and Pseries parse the "linux,pci-probe-only" >>> to engage the PCI_PROBE_ONLY mode, and both have a subtle bug that >>> can be triggered if the property has no parameter. >> >> Humm, I bet we could break a lot of machines if we fixed the core code >> to properly make pp->value NULL when there is no value. >> >>> Provide a generic implementation that can be used by both. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier >>> --- >>> drivers/of/of_pci.c | 30 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >>> include/linux/of_pci.h | 3 +++ >>> 2 files changed, 33 insertions(+) >>> >>> diff --git a/drivers/of/of_pci.c b/drivers/of/of_pci.c >>> index 5751dc5..a4e29ff 100644 >>> --- a/drivers/of/of_pci.c >>> +++ b/drivers/of/of_pci.c >>> @@ -118,6 +118,36 @@ int of_get_pci_domain_nr(struct device_node *node) >>> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(of_get_pci_domain_nr); >>> >>> /** >>> + * of_pci_check_probe_only - Setup probe only mode if linux,pci-probe-only >>> + * is present and valid >>> + * >>> + * @node: device tree node that may contain the property (usually "chosen") >>> + * >>> + */ >>> +void of_pci_check_probe_only(struct device_node *node) >>> +{ >>> + const int *prop; >>> + int len; >>> + >>> + if (!node) >>> + return; >>> + >>> + prop = of_get_property(node, "linux,pci-probe-only", &len); >> >> It is preferred to use of_property_read_u32 to avoid just these types >> of problems. > > I don't know enough OF to really understand this, but I infer that > this is a suggestion for improving the patch. Should I be waiting for > a v3 series? Yes, I'll post an update very shortly. Thanks for reminding me! M. -- Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny...