From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-13.9 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_CR_TRAILER, INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0BCCFC2B9F4 for ; Mon, 14 Jun 2021 12:39:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C12A561206 for ; Mon, 14 Jun 2021 12:39:25 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org C12A561206 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=huawei.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:MIME-Version:In-Reply-To:References: Message-ID:Date:Subject:CC:To:From:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=Z9GUnaDke3dT67oOZ62Ry2L28mQmujM0DPqiXFRQXXM=; b=UA83v+GZqUGwTI STErCZULvxk9BPsGy8b+oqvZhM/kfb6TzNeeU0ID+Lao2cEYi+INwYAVghQqOTYgdbp622OkYsJqS nxbBoWcxQff0HwlY/gu3iybpyQQAl7JeonBJV9VgtFDCiKyJabMVu+EfihZa9iT6+QDbIL/LQzfsC NMkTnSrXtiqmtLu8HMcIMXdypxp9MkPpCr/ywj9wGo0rrWL8w690kSCJTLe65a9r2d0ccIJJP6NHn BjYOVHL6KzM2PBvz69FPDF7C3rkM4owIc0hH74pcYJactutPb4dID6WGqQ5N+C+E1+x0lmMFmsnjG 7YsqFXERoDNhn7HV6eqA==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1lslqk-00E5TX-Gs; Mon, 14 Jun 2021 12:37:54 +0000 Received: from szxga01-in.huawei.com ([45.249.212.187]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1lslqg-00E5S6-76 for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Mon, 14 Jun 2021 12:37:52 +0000 Received: from dggemv703-chm.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.30.72.56]) by szxga01-in.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4G3W9b42KPzZdp9; Mon, 14 Jun 2021 20:34:43 +0800 (CST) Received: from dggema722-chm.china.huawei.com (10.3.20.86) by dggemv703-chm.china.huawei.com (10.3.19.46) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256) id 15.1.2176.2; Mon, 14 Jun 2021 20:37:37 +0800 Received: from lhreml710-chm.china.huawei.com (10.201.108.61) by dggema722-chm.china.huawei.com (10.3.20.86) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.2176.2; Mon, 14 Jun 2021 20:37:36 +0800 Received: from lhreml710-chm.china.huawei.com ([169.254.81.184]) by lhreml710-chm.china.huawei.com ([169.254.81.184]) with mapi id 15.01.2176.012; Mon, 14 Jun 2021 13:37:34 +0100 From: Shameerali Kolothum Thodi To: Robin Murphy , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , "linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org" , "iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org" CC: Linuxarm , "lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com" , "joro@8bytes.org" , wanghuiqiang , "Guohanjun (Hanjun Guo)" , "steven.price@arm.com" , "Sami.Mujawar@arm.com" , "jon@solid-run.com" , "eric.auger@redhat.com" , yangyicong Subject: RE: [PATCH v5 1/8] ACPI/IORT: Add support for RMR node parsing Thread-Topic: [PATCH v5 1/8] ACPI/IORT: Add support for RMR node parsing Thread-Index: AQHXUIxnG5hhFJByf0K0fNZqfWU2CasTaxEAgAAiFPA= Date: Mon, 14 Jun 2021 12:37:34 +0000 Message-ID: <5634877440314121a8b0ed7cc238fb63@huawei.com> References: <20210524110222.2212-1-shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com> <20210524110222.2212-2-shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com> <15c7fac0-11a8-0cdb-aac3-b5d8feb8f066@arm.com> In-Reply-To: <15c7fac0-11a8-0cdb-aac3-b5d8feb8f066@arm.com> Accept-Language: en-GB, en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [10.47.26.251] MIME-Version: 1.0 X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20210614_053750_656268_A2811A0C X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 38.58 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org Hi Robin, > -----Original Message----- > From: Robin Murphy [mailto:robin.murphy@arm.com] > Sent: 14 June 2021 12:15 > To: Shameerali Kolothum Thodi ; > linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org; > iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org > Cc: Linuxarm ; lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com; > joro@8bytes.org; wanghuiqiang ; Guohanjun > (Hanjun Guo) ; steven.price@arm.com; > Sami.Mujawar@arm.com; jon@solid-run.com; eric.auger@redhat.com; > yangyicong > Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 1/8] ACPI/IORT: Add support for RMR node parsing > > On 2021-05-24 12:02, Shameer Kolothum wrote: > > Add support for parsing RMR node information from ACPI. > > Find associated stream id and smmu node info from the > > RMR node and populate a linked list with RMR memory > > descriptors. > > > > Signed-off-by: Shameer Kolothum > > > --- > > drivers/acpi/arm64/iort.c | 104 > +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++- > > 1 file changed, 103 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/acpi/arm64/iort.c b/drivers/acpi/arm64/iort.c > > index 3912a1f6058e..fea1ffaedf3b 100644 > > --- a/drivers/acpi/arm64/iort.c > > +++ b/drivers/acpi/arm64/iort.c > > @@ -40,6 +40,19 @@ struct iort_fwnode { > > static LIST_HEAD(iort_fwnode_list); > > static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(iort_fwnode_lock); > > > > +/* > > + * One entry for IORT RMR. > > + */ > > +struct iort_rmr_entry { > > + struct list_head list; > > + u32 sid; > > + struct acpi_iort_node *smmu; > > + struct acpi_iort_rmr_desc *rmr_desc; > > + u32 flags; > > +}; > > + > > +static LIST_HEAD(iort_rmr_list); /* list of RMR regions from ACPI > */ > > + > > /** > > * iort_set_fwnode() - Create iort_fwnode and use it to register > > * iommu data in the iort_fwnode_list > > @@ -393,7 +406,8 @@ static struct acpi_iort_node > *iort_node_get_id(struct acpi_iort_node *node, > > if (node->type == ACPI_IORT_NODE_NAMED_COMPONENT || > > node->type == ACPI_IORT_NODE_PCI_ROOT_COMPLEX || > > node->type == ACPI_IORT_NODE_SMMU_V3 || > > - node->type == ACPI_IORT_NODE_PMCG) { > > + node->type == ACPI_IORT_NODE_PMCG || > > + node->type == ACPI_IORT_NODE_RMR) { > > *id_out = map->output_base; > > return parent; > > } > > @@ -1660,6 +1674,91 @@ static void __init iort_enable_acs(struct > acpi_iort_node *iort_node) > > #else > > static inline void iort_enable_acs(struct acpi_iort_node *iort_node) { } > > #endif > > +static int iort_rmr_desc_valid(struct acpi_iort_rmr_desc *desc, u32 count) > > +{ > > + int i, j; > > + > > + for (i = 0; i < count; i++) { > > + u64 end, start = desc[i].base_address, length = desc[i].length; > > + > > + if (!IS_ALIGNED(start, SZ_64K) || !IS_ALIGNED(length, SZ_64K)) > > + return -EINVAL; > > We should certainly FW_BUG for this, but maybe it's OK to continue, > since all we should need to do is round our iommu_resv_regions to at > least PAGE_SIZE. That seems possibly better than ignoring them and > having things potentially blow up later (especially if an end user > exercises the system more thoroughly than the firmware developer tested > it, which in at least one case I've seen may be "at all"...) Ok. Will report FW_BUG but continue with a rounded addr/size. > > > + end = start + length - 1; > > + > > + /* Check for address overlap */ > > + for (j = i + 1; j < count; j++) { > > + u64 e_start = desc[j].base_address; > > + u64 e_end = e_start + desc[j].length - 1; > > + > > + if (start <= e_end && end >= e_start) > > + return -EINVAL; > > Similarly it's not *too* hard to trim overlaps; I guess it's really a > question of whether we want to bother :/ I guess then, we can just report it and ignore, pr_warn(FW_BUG, "Found overlapping rmr desc @...., but ignoring...\n" Thanks Shameer > > + } > > + } > > + > > + return 0; > > +} > > + > > +static int __init iort_parse_rmr(struct acpi_iort_node *iort_node) > > +{ > > + struct acpi_iort_node *smmu; > > + struct iort_rmr_entry *e; > > + struct acpi_iort_rmr *rmr; > > + struct acpi_iort_rmr_desc *rmr_desc; > > + u32 map_count = iort_node->mapping_count; > > + u32 sid; > > Nit: extra space. > > > + int i, ret = 0; > > + > > + if (iort_node->type != ACPI_IORT_NODE_RMR) > > + return 0; > > + > > + if (!iort_node->mapping_offset || map_count != 1) { > > Beware that there was some discussion about allowing multiple SIDs to > share an RMR descriptor, since there are potential use-cases which would > otherwise lead to excessive duplication (e.g. an MSI doorbell carveout > in a VM which would effectively apply to all possible PCI RIDs). I think > the conclusion we reached was that disallowing that was fairly > arbitrary, and could possibly be relaxed in future. It looks like the > design of things here could grow to fit that fairly easily though, so I > don't think it's a major concern. > > Robin. > > > + pr_err(FW_BUG "Invalid ID mapping, skipping RMR node %p\n", > > + iort_node); > > + return -EINVAL; > > + } > > + > > + /* Retrieve associated smmu and stream id */ > > + smmu = iort_node_get_id(iort_node, &sid, 0); > > + if (!smmu) { > > + pr_err(FW_BUG "Invalid SMMU reference, skipping RMR > node %p\n", > > + iort_node); > > + return -EINVAL; > > + } > > + > > + /* Retrieve RMR data */ > > + rmr = (struct acpi_iort_rmr *)iort_node->node_data; > > + if (!rmr->rmr_offset || !rmr->rmr_count) { > > + pr_err(FW_BUG "Invalid RMR descriptor array, skipping RMR > node %p\n", > > + iort_node); > > + return -EINVAL; > > + } > > + > > + rmr_desc = ACPI_ADD_PTR(struct acpi_iort_rmr_desc, iort_node, > > + rmr->rmr_offset); > > + > > + ret = iort_rmr_desc_valid(rmr_desc, rmr->rmr_count); > > + if (ret) { > > + pr_err(FW_BUG "Invalid RMR descriptor[%d] for node %p, > skipping...\n", > > + i, iort_node); > > + return ret; > > + } > > + > > + for (i = 0; i < rmr->rmr_count; i++, rmr_desc++) { > > + e = kmalloc(sizeof(*e), GFP_KERNEL); > > + if (!e) > > + return -ENOMEM; > > + > > + e->sid = sid; > > + e->smmu = smmu; > > + e->rmr_desc = rmr_desc; > > + e->flags = rmr->flags; > > + > > + list_add_tail(&e->list, &iort_rmr_list); > > + } > > + > > + return 0; > > +} > > > > static void __init iort_init_platform_devices(void) > > { > > @@ -1689,6 +1788,9 @@ static void __init iort_init_platform_devices(void) > > > > iort_enable_acs(iort_node); > > > > + if (iort_table->revision == 3) > > + iort_parse_rmr(iort_node); > > + > > ops = iort_get_dev_cfg(iort_node); > > if (ops) { > > fwnode = acpi_alloc_fwnode_static(); > > _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel