linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: dirk.behme@gmail.com (Dirk Behme)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v4] xen/arm: Add a clock property
Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2016 20:56:30 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <57868EDE.6060406@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.10.1607131941200.26575@sstabellini-ThinkPad-X260>

On 13.07.2016 20:43, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> On Wed, 13 Jul 2016, Dirk Behme wrote:
>> On 13.07.2016 00:26, Michael Turquette wrote:
>>> Quoting Dirk Behme (2016-07-12 00:46:45)
>>>> Clocks described by this property are reserved for use by Xen, and the OS
>>>> must not alter their state any way, such as disabling or gating a clock,
>>>> or modifying its rate. Ensuring this may impose constraints on parent
>>>> clocks or other resources used by the clock tree.
>>>
>>> Note that clk_prepare_enable will not prevent the rate from changing
>>> (clk_set_rate) or a parent from changing (clk_set_parent). The only way
>>> to do this currently would be to set the following flags on the effected
>>> clocks:
>>>
>>> 	CLK_SET_RATE_GATE
>>> 	CLK_SET_PARENT_GATE
>>
>>
>>
>> Regarding setting flags, I think we already talked about that. I think the
>> conclusion was that in our case its not possible to manipulate the flags in
>> the OS as this isn't intended to be done in cases like ours. Therefore no API
>> is exported for this.
>>
>> I.e. if we need to set these flags, we have to do that in Xen where we add the
>> clocks to the hypervisor node in the device tree. And not in the kernel patch
>> discussed here.
>
> These are internal Linux flags, aren't they?


I've been under the impression that you can set clock "flags" via the 
device tree. Seems I need to re-check that ;)

Best regards

Dirk


> They cannot be set in Xen.
>
> If the only way to make sure that clk_set_rate and clk_set_parent fail
> on one of the clocks "owned" by Xen is to set CLK_SET_RATE_GATE and
> CLK_SET_PARENT_GATE, we'll have to do that. Even if it means introducing
> a new internal Linux API.
>
>
>>> And then enable the clocks. All calls to clk_set_parent and clk_set_rate
>>> with those clocks in the path will fail, so long as they are prepared
>>> and enabled. This implementation detail is specific to Linux and
>>> definitely should not go into the binding.
>>>
>>>>
>>>> This property is used to proxy clocks for devices Xen has taken ownership
>>>> of, such as UARTs, for which the associated clock controller(s) remain
>>>> under the control of Dom0.
>>>
>>> I'm still not completely sure about this type of layering and whether or
>>> not it is sane. If you want Xen to manage the clock controller, AND you
>>> want Linux guests or dom0 to consume those clocks and manipulate them in
>>> other drivers, then this solution won't work.
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Mike
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Up to now, the workaround for this has been to use the Linux kernel
>>>> command line parameter 'clk_ignore_unused'. See Xen bug
>>>>
>>>> http://bugs.xenproject.org/xen/bug/45
>>>>
>>>> too.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Dirk Behme <dirk.behme@de.bosch.com>
>>>> ---
>>>> Changes in v4: Switch to the xen.txt description proposed by Mark:
>>>>                 https://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg516158.html
>>>>
>>>> Changes in v3: Use the xen.txt description proposed by Michael. Thanks!
>>>>
>>>> Changes in v2: Drop the Linux implementation details like
>>>> clk_disable_unused
>>>>                 in xen.txt.
>>>>
>>>>   Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/xen.txt | 12 +++++++
>>>>   arch/arm/xen/enlighten.c                      | 47
>>>> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>>   2 files changed, 59 insertions(+)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/xen.txt
>>>> b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/xen.txt
>>>> index c9b9321..437e50b 100644
>>>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/xen.txt
>>>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/xen.txt
>>>> @@ -17,6 +17,18 @@ the following properties:
>>>>     A GIC node is also required.
>>>>     This property is unnecessary when booting Dom0 using ACPI.
>>>>
>>>> +Optional properties:
>>>> +
>>>> +- clocks: a list of phandle + clock-specifier pairs
>>>> +  Clocks described by this property are reserved for use by Xen, and the
>>>> +  OS must not alter their state any way, such as disabling or gating a
>>>> +  clock, or modifying its rate. Ensuring this may impose constraints on
>>>> +  parent clocks or other resources used by the clock tree.
>>>> +
>>>> +  Note: this property is used to proxy clocks for devices Xen has taken
>>>> +  ownership of, such as UARTs, for which the associated clock
>>>> +  controller(s) remain under the control of Dom0.
>>>> +
>>>>   To support UEFI on Xen ARM virtual platforms, Xen populates the FDT
>>>> "uefi" node
>>>>   under /hypervisor with following parameters:
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/arch/arm/xen/enlighten.c b/arch/arm/xen/enlighten.c
>>>> index 47acb36..5c546d0 100644
>>>> --- a/arch/arm/xen/enlighten.c
>>>> +++ b/arch/arm/xen/enlighten.c
>>>> @@ -24,6 +24,7 @@
>>>>   #include <linux/of_fdt.h>
>>>>   #include <linux/of_irq.h>
>>>>   #include <linux/of_address.h>
>>>> +#include <linux/clk-provider.h>
>>>>   #include <linux/cpuidle.h>
>>>>   #include <linux/cpufreq.h>
>>>>   #include <linux/cpu.h>
>>>> @@ -444,6 +445,52 @@ static int __init xen_pm_init(void)
>>>>   }
>>>>   late_initcall(xen_pm_init);
>>>>
>>>> +/*
>>>> + * Check if we want to register some clocks, that they
>>>> + * are not freed because unused by clk_disable_unused().
>>>> + * E.g. the serial console clock.
>>>> + */
>>>> +static int __init xen_arm_register_clks(void)
>>>> +{
>>>> +       struct clk *clk;
>>>> +       struct device_node *xen_node;
>>>> +       unsigned int i, count;
>>>> +       int ret = 0;
>>>> +
>>>> +       xen_node = of_find_compatible_node(NULL, NULL, "xen,xen");
>>>> +       if (!xen_node) {
>>>> +               pr_err("Xen support was detected before, but it has
>>>> disappeared\n");
>>>> +               return -EINVAL;
>>>> +       }
>>>> +
>>>> +       count = of_clk_get_parent_count(xen_node);
>>>> +       if (!count)
>>>> +               goto out;
>>>> +
>>>> +       for (i = 0; i < count; i++) {
>>>> +               clk = of_clk_get(xen_node, i);
>>>> +               if (IS_ERR(clk)) {
>>>> +                       pr_err("Xen failed to register clock %i. Error:
>>>> %li\n",
>>>> +                              i, PTR_ERR(clk));
>>>> +                       ret = PTR_ERR(clk);
>>>> +                       goto out;
>>>> +               }
>>>> +
>>>> +               ret = clk_prepare_enable(clk);
>>>> +               if (ret < 0) {
>>>> +                       pr_err("Xen failed to enable clock %i. Error:
>>>> %i\n",
>>>> +                              i, ret);
>>>> +                       goto out;
>>>> +               }
>>>> +       }
>>>> +
>>>> +       ret = 0;
>>>> +
>>>> +out:
>>>> +       of_node_put(xen_node);
>>>> +       return ret;
>>>> +}
>>>> +late_initcall(xen_arm_register_clks);
>>>>
>>>>   /* empty stubs */
>>>>   void xen_arch_pre_suspend(void) { }
>>>> --
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Xen-devel mailing list
> Xen-devel at lists.xen.org
> https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
>

  reply	other threads:[~2016-07-13 18:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-07-12  7:46 [PATCH v4] xen/arm: Add a clock property Dirk Behme
2016-07-12 22:26 ` Michael Turquette
2016-07-13  8:35   ` Dirk Behme
2016-07-13 18:43     ` Stefano Stabellini
2016-07-13 18:56       ` Dirk Behme [this message]
2016-07-13 21:03         ` [Xen-devel] " Michael Turquette
2016-07-14  6:31           ` Dirk Behme
2016-07-14 10:14             ` Julien Grall
2016-07-14 10:32               ` Dirk Behme
2016-07-14 10:38             ` Stefano Stabellini
2016-07-14 10:49               ` Dirk Behme
2016-07-14 15:55                 ` Stefano Stabellini
2016-07-14 16:30                   ` Dirk Behme
2016-07-14 17:14                     ` Julien Grall
2016-07-15  7:53                       ` Dirk Behme
2016-07-22  0:07               ` Michael Turquette
2016-07-22  1:16                 ` Stefano Stabellini
2016-07-27  5:05                   ` Dirk Behme
2016-07-28 11:17                     ` Julien Grall
2016-07-28 14:35                       ` Dirk Behme
2016-07-14 10:25           ` Stefano Stabellini
2016-07-13 18:35 ` Stefano Stabellini
2016-07-13 18:47   ` [Xen-devel] " Dirk Behme
2016-07-13 19:07     ` Stefano Stabellini
2016-07-14  6:11       ` Dirk Behme
2016-07-14 10:28         ` Stefano Stabellini
2016-07-20  9:43 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2016-07-20 11:01   ` Julien Grall
2016-07-20 11:49     ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2016-07-20 12:10       ` Julien Grall
2016-07-20 12:46         ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2016-07-20 12:53           ` Dirk Behme
2016-07-20 13:21           ` Julien Grall
2016-07-22  0:14             ` Michael Turquette

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=57868EDE.6060406@gmail.com \
    --to=dirk.behme@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).