linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: robin.murphy@arm.com (Robin Murphy)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v1 3/4] arm64: Add arm64 kexec support
Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2016 11:03:14 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5791EF62.5070006@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160722040842.GA14911@localhost.localdomain>

On 22/07/16 05:08, Pratyush Anand wrote:
> On 21/07/2016:02:49:36 PM, Geoff Levand wrote:
>> On Thu, 2016-07-21 at 11:50 +0100, Robin Murphy wrote:
>>> The Exynos UART (drivers/tty/serial/samsung.c) is one which comes to
>>> mind as definitely existing, and on arm64 systems to boot. The TX
>>> register is at offset 0x20 there.
>>
>> Here's what I came up with.
>>
>>
>> +	struct data {const char *name; int tx_offset;};
>> +	static const struct data ok_list[] = {
>> +	/*	{"armada-3700-uart", ?},	*/
>> +		{"exynos4210-uart", 0x20},
>> +	/*	{"ls1021a-lpuart", ?},		*/
>> +	/*	{"meson-uart", ?},		*/
>> +	/*	{"mt6577-uart", ?},		*/
>> +		{"ns16550", 0},
>> +		{"ns16550a", 0},
>> +		{"pl011", 0},
>> +		{NULL, 0}
>> +	};
> 
> sinc functionality is just to debug the scenario when something goes wrong in
> purgatory. IMHO, it should be disabled by default. So, why not to keep it as
> simple as possible. Its a low level debugging mainly for developer, so user
> should know the absolute address. Therefore, I think no need to parse earlycon
> or earlyprintk from command line.  Whatever user passes in --port can be treated
> as address of TX register. If TX offset is 0x20, then user can pass --port as
> base+0x20. Additionally, we can pass TX register width as well. So what about
> something like "--port=0x1c020000,1" where 0x1c020000 is TX register address and
> 1 says about it's width in bytes.

I don't think even that is worthwhile, since without any polling it
still relies on the UART having FIFOs, someone having already enabled
the FIFOs, the FIFOs being deep enough and/or the output being short
enough. In short, it's fragile enough that I'm not convinced it's even
useful as a debug option. I suggest we simply copy the purgatory console
implementation from, say, ARM or Alpha.

Robin.

> 
> ~Pratyush
> 

  parent reply	other threads:[~2016-07-22 10:03 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 45+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-07-19 23:28 [PATCH v1 0/4] arm64 kexec-tools patches Geoff Levand
2016-07-19 23:28 ` [PATCH v1 1/4] kexec: (bugfix) calc correct end address of memory ranges in device tree Geoff Levand
2016-07-27 22:45   ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2016-07-27 23:23     ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2016-07-28 23:54       ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2016-07-29  8:27         ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2016-07-29 17:12           ` Geoff Levand
2016-07-29 17:23             ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2016-08-01  4:52               ` AKASHI Takahiro
2016-09-06  0:29                 ` Memory range end be inclusive or exclusive? " AKASHI Takahiro
2016-10-31  8:50                   ` AKASHI Takahiro
2016-11-07  8:17                     ` Simon Horman
2016-07-19 23:28 ` [PATCH v1 2/4] kexec: Add common device tree routines Geoff Levand
2016-07-22  7:19   ` AKASHI Takahiro
2016-07-27 18:11     ` Geoff Levand
2016-07-19 23:28 ` [PATCH v1 4/4] arm64: Add support for binary image files Geoff Levand
2016-07-19 23:28 ` [PATCH v1 3/4] arm64: Add arm64 kexec support Geoff Levand
2016-07-20 15:39   ` Mark Rutland
2016-07-20 19:19     ` Geoff Levand
2016-07-21 10:31       ` Mark Rutland
2016-07-21 10:50         ` Robin Murphy
2016-07-21 21:49           ` Geoff Levand
2016-07-22  4:08             ` Pratyush Anand
2016-07-22  5:33               ` AKASHI Takahiro
2016-07-22  9:54               ` Mark Rutland
2016-07-22 10:03               ` Robin Murphy [this message]
2016-07-22 13:56                 ` Pratyush Anand
2016-07-22 17:59                   ` Robin Murphy
2016-07-25 21:56                 ` Geoff Levand
2016-07-20 17:53   ` Pratyush Anand
2016-07-20 20:33     ` Geoff Levand
2016-07-20 20:54   ` [PATCH v1.2 " Geoff Levand
2016-07-22  7:12     ` AKASHI Takahiro
2016-07-26  0:37       ` Geoff Levand
2016-07-25 14:28     ` Ruslan Bilovol
2016-07-25 20:50       ` Geoff Levand
2016-07-26  1:36         ` Ruslan Bilovol
2016-07-26  8:16           ` AKASHI Takahiro
2016-07-26 21:26             ` Ruslan Bilovol
2016-07-26 21:54               ` Geoff Levand
2016-07-20  4:30 ` [PATCH v1 0/4] arm64 kexec-tools patches AKASHI Takahiro
2016-07-26 23:05 ` Simon Horman
2016-07-27  5:57   ` AKASHI Takahiro
2016-07-28 18:09   ` Geoff Levand
2016-07-29  0:31     ` Simon Horman

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5791EF62.5070006@arm.com \
    --to=robin.murphy@arm.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).