linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com>
To: Baoquan He <bhe@redhat.com>
Cc: <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
	<akpm@linux-foundation.org>, <hch@infradead.org>,
	<agordeev@linux.ibm.com>, <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>,
	<schnelle@linux.ibm.com>, <David.Laight@aculab.com>,
	<shorne@gmail.com>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
	<linux-arch@vger.kernel.org>,
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 03/11] mm/ioremap: change the return value of io[re|un]map_allowed and rename
Date: Mon, 10 Oct 2022 08:55:03 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5dbf1591-fb8c-5b78-62fc-c1fc0dc6273d@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Y0NmcspddDQICfTi@MiWiFi-R3L-srv>


On 2022/10/10 8:25, Baoquan He wrote:
> On 10/09/22 at 07:13pm, Kefeng Wang wrote:
>> On 2022/10/9 18:31, Baoquan He wrote:
>>> Currently, hooks ioremap_allowed() and iounmap_allowed() are used to
>>> check if it's qualified to do ioremap, and now this is done on ARM64.
>>> However, in oder to convert more architectures to take GENERIC_IOREMAP
>>> method, several more things need be done in those two hooks:
>>>    1) The io address mapping need be handled specifically on architectures,
>>>       e.g arc, ia64, s390;
>>>    2) The original physical address passed into ioremap_prot() need be
>>>       fixed up, e.g arc;
>>>    3) The 'prot' passed into ioremap_prot() need be adjusted, e.g on arc
>>>       and xtensa.
>>>
>>> To handle these three issues,
>>>
>>>    1) Rename ioremap_allowed() and iounmap_allowed() to arch_ioremap()
>>>       and arch_iounmap() since the old name can't reflect their
>>>       functionality after change;
>>>    2) Change the return value of arch_ioremap() so that arch can add
>>>       specifical io address mapping handling inside and return the maped
>>>       address. Now their returned value means:
>>>       ===
>>>       arch_ioremap() return a bool,
>> pointer?
> Right, I forgot fixing it again. Thanks.
>
>>>         - IS_ERR means return an error
>>>         - 0 means continue to remap
>>>         - a non-zero, non-IS_ERR pointer is returned directly
>>>       arch_iounmap() return a bool,
>>>         - true means continue to vunmap
>>>         - false means skip vunmap and return directly
>> ...
>>>    /*
>>> diff --git a/include/asm-generic/io.h b/include/asm-generic/io.h
>>> index a68f8fbf423b..2ae16906f3be 100644
>>> --- a/include/asm-generic/io.h
>>> +++ b/include/asm-generic/io.h
>>> @@ -1049,25 +1049,26 @@ static inline void iounmap(volatile void __iomem *addr)
>>>    /*
>>>     * Arch code can implement the following two hooks when using GENERIC_IOREMAP
>>> - * ioremap_allowed() return a bool,
>>> - *   - true means continue to remap
>>> - *   - false means skip remap and return directly
>>> - * iounmap_allowed() return a bool,
>>> + * arch_ioremap() return a bool,
>> ditto...
> Will change.
>
>>>    	area = get_vm_area_caller(size, VM_IOREMAP,
>>>    			__builtin_return_address(0));
>>>    	if (!area)
>>> @@ -52,7 +57,7 @@ void iounmap(volatile void __iomem *addr)
>>>    {
>>>    	void *vaddr = (void *)((unsigned long)addr & PAGE_MASK);
>>> -	if (!iounmap_allowed(vaddr))
>>> +	if (!arch_iounmap((void __iomem *)addr))
>> vaddr?
> No, it's intentional. Alexander suggested this, both of you discussed
> this in v1, see below thread.
ok, please ignore it.
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/Yu4mYxpV0GWRTjQp@li-4a3a4a4c-28e5-11b2-a85c-a8d192c6f089.ibm.com/T/#u
>
>>>    		return;
>>>    	if (is_vmalloc_addr(vaddr))
>
> .

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

      reply	other threads:[~2022-10-10  0:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <20221009103114.149036-1-bhe@redhat.com>
2022-10-09 10:31 ` [PATCH v3 03/11] mm/ioremap: change the return value of io[re|un]map_allowed and rename Baoquan He
2022-10-09 11:13   ` Kefeng Wang
2022-10-10  0:25     ` Baoquan He
2022-10-10  0:55       ` Kefeng Wang [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5dbf1591-fb8c-5b78-62fc-c1fc0dc6273d@huawei.com \
    --to=wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com \
    --cc=David.Laight@aculab.com \
    --cc=agordeev@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=bhe@redhat.com \
    --cc=christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu \
    --cc=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=schnelle@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=shorne@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).