linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>
To: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>,
	Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>,
	Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>, Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] arm64: Add support for SMCCC TRNG firmware interface
Date: Wed, 7 Oct 2020 15:16:07 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <65057faa-d06b-6baf-4f12-9587cacbe3a9@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201006201808.37665-3-andre.przywara@arm.com>

Hi Andre,

On 06/10/2020 21:18, Andre Przywara wrote:
> The ARM architected TRNG firmware interface, described in ARM spec
> DEN0098[1], defines an ARM SMCCC based interface to a true random number
> generator, provided by firmware.
> This can be discovered via the SMCCC >=v1.1 interface, and provides
> up to 192 bits of entropy per call.
> 
> Hook this SMC call into arm64's arch_get_random_*() implementation,
> coming to the rescue when the CPU does not implement the ARM v8.5 RNG
> system registers.
> 
> For the detection, we piggy back on the PSCI/SMCCC discovery (which gives
> us the conduit to use: hvc or smc), then try to call the
> ARM_SMCCC_TRNG_VERSION function, which returns -1 if this interface is
> not implemented.

>  arch/arm64/include/asm/archrandom.h | 83 +++++++++++++++++++++++++----
>  1 file changed, 73 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/archrandom.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/archrandom.h
> index ffb1a40d5475..b6c291c42a48 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/archrandom.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/archrandom.h
> @@ -7,6 +7,13 @@
>  #include <linux/bug.h>
>  #include <linux/kernel.h>
>  #include <asm/cpufeature.h>
> +#include <linux/arm-smccc.h>
> +
> +static enum smc_trng_status {
> +	SMC_TRNG_UNKNOWN,
> +	SMC_TRNG_NOT_SUPPORTED,
> +	SMC_TRNG_SUPPORTED
> +} smc_trng_status = SMC_TRNG_UNKNOWN;

Doesn't this static variable in a header file mean each file that includes this has its
own copy? Is that intentional?


Thanks,

James

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

  parent reply	other threads:[~2020-10-07 14:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-10-06 20:18 [PATCH 0/2] arm64: Add support for SMCCC TRNG interface Andre Przywara
2020-10-06 20:18 ` [PATCH 1/2] firmware: smccc: Add SMCCC TRNG function call IDs Andre Przywara
2020-10-06 20:18 ` [PATCH 2/2] arm64: Add support for SMCCC TRNG firmware interface Andre Przywara
2020-10-07 10:48   ` Mark Brown
2020-10-07 14:16   ` James Morse [this message]
2020-10-07 14:43     ` André Przywara
2020-10-12  6:35       ` Ard Biesheuvel

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=65057faa-d06b-6baf-4f12-9587cacbe3a9@arm.com \
    --to=james.morse@arm.com \
    --cc=andre.przywara@arm.com \
    --cc=ardb@kernel.org \
    --cc=broonie@kernel.org \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=richard.henderson@linaro.org \
    --cc=sudeep.holla@arm.com \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).