Re: [PATCH] genirq: update irq stats from NMI handlers

[Julien Thierry <julien.thierry@arm.com>]

Hi Shijith,

On 04/07/2019 05:22, Shijith Thotton wrote:
> The NMI handlers handle_percpu_devid_fasteoi_nmi() and
> handle_fasteoi_nmi() added by commit 2dcf1fbcad35 ("genirq: Provide NMI
> handlers") do not update the interrupt counts. Due to that the NMI
> interrupt count does not show up correctly in /proc/interrupts.
> 
> Update the functions to fix this. With this change, we can see stats of
> the perf NMI interrupts on arm64.
> 
> Fixes: 2dcf1fbcad35 ("genirq: Provide NMI handlers")
> 
> Signed-off-by: Shijith Thotton <sthotton@marvell.com>
> ---
>  kernel/irq/chip.c | 4 ++++
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/kernel/irq/chip.c b/kernel/irq/chip.c
> index 29d6c7d070b4..88d1e054c6ea 100644
> --- a/kernel/irq/chip.c
> +++ b/kernel/irq/chip.c
> @@ -748,6 +748,8 @@ void handle_fasteoi_nmi(struct irq_desc *desc)
>  	unsigned int irq = irq_desc_get_irq(desc);
>  	irqreturn_t res;
>  
> +	kstat_incr_irqs_this_cpu(desc);
> +

This needs to be called with the desc lock taken, otherwise we're likely
to corrupt desc->tot_count.
But taking the desc lock is something we can't do in NMI context (
*spin_lock_irq*() won't prevent an NMI from happening).

>  	trace_irq_handler_entry(irq, action);
>  	/*
>  	 * NMIs cannot be shared, there is only one action.
> @@ -962,6 +964,8 @@ void handle_percpu_devid_fasteoi_nmi(struct irq_desc *desc)
>  	unsigned int irq = irq_desc_get_irq(desc);
>  	irqreturn_t res;
>  
> +	__kstat_incr_irqs_this_cpu(desc);
> +

Looking at handle_percpu_irq(), I think this might be acceptable. But
does it make sense to only have kstats for percpu NMIs?

Cheers,

-- 
Julien Thierry

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel