Linux-ARM-Kernel Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / Atom feed
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@canonical.com>
To: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>, Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>,
	iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org,
	Jon Hunter <jonathanh@nvidia.com>,
	Nicolin Chen <nicolinc@nvidia.com>,
	linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org, Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 00/10] arm64: tegra: Prevent early SMMU faults
Date: Wed, 2 Jun 2021 16:57:24 +0200
Message-ID: <6cc79313-30b9-8223-b346-931ceea301d6@canonical.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YLebbQZlROtSq124@orome.fritz.box>

On 02/06/2021 16:53, Thierry Reding wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 02, 2021 at 12:44:58PM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> On 02/06/2021 10:52, Thierry Reding wrote:
>>> On Wed, Jun 02, 2021 at 09:35:13AM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>>>> On 02/06/2021 09:33, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>>>>> On 01/06/2021 20:08, Thierry Reding wrote:
>>>>>> On Tue, Jun 01, 2021 at 01:26:46PM +0100, Will Deacon wrote:
>>>>>>> On Fri, May 28, 2021 at 07:05:28PM +0200, Thierry Reding wrote:
>>>>>>>> On Tue, Apr 20, 2021 at 07:26:09PM +0200, Thierry Reding wrote:
>>>>>>>>> From: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Probably best if I queue 3-6 on a separate branch once you send a v3,
>>>>>>> then Krzysztof can pull that in if he needs it.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Patch 5 has a build-time dependency on patch 1, so they need to go in
>>>>>> together. The reason why I suggested Krzysztof pick these up is because
>>>>>> there is a restructuring series that this depends on, which will go into
>>>>>> Krzysztof's tree. So in order to pull in 3-6, you'd get a bunch of other
>>>>>> and mostly unrelated stuff as well.
>>>>>
>>>>> I missed that part... what other series are needed for this one? Except
>>>>> Dmitry's power management set I do not have anything in my sight for
>>>>> Tegras memory controllers.
>>>>>
>>>>> Anyway, I can take the memory bits and provide a stable tag with these.
>>>>> Recently there was quite a lot work around Tegra memory controllers, so
>>>>> this makes especially sense if new patches appear.
>>>>
>>>> OK, I think I have now the patchset you talked about - "memory: tegra:
>>>> Driver unification" v2, right?
>>>
>>> Yes, that's the one. That series is fairly self-contained, but Dmitry's
>>> power management set has dependencies that pull in the regulator, clock
>>> and ARM SoC trees.
>>>
>>> I did a test merge of the driver unification series with a branch that
>>> has Dmitry's patches and all the dependencies and there are no conflicts
>>> so that, fortunately, doesn't further complicates things.
>>>
>>> Do you want me to send you a pull request with Dmitry's memory
>>> controller changes? You could then apply the unification series on top,
>>> which should allow this SMMU series to apply cleanly on top of that.
>>
>> Makes sense and it looks quite bulletproof for future changes. Let's do
>> like this. I will apply your patch 1/10 from this v2 on top of it and
>> driver unification later.
> 
> The SMMU series here depends on the unification series, so the
> unification series needs to go first. It'd be a fair bit of work to
> reverse that because the ->probe_device() callback implemented by the
> first patch of this SMMU series is part of the tegra_mc_ops structure
> that's introduced in the unification series.

Right, you already wrote it in the first email in this thread, I just
reversed words in my head... Then as you wrote - take Dmitry's changes
and share them via pull to me. I'll put on top the unification series,
then #1 from this SMMU series and finally I'll provide a pull request
for Will so his SMMU can go on.

Best regards,
Krzysztof

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

      reply index

Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-04-20 17:26 Thierry Reding
2021-04-20 17:26 ` [PATCH v2 01/10] memory: tegra: Implement SID override programming Thierry Reding
2021-04-26  8:28   ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2021-04-26 12:13     ` Thierry Reding
2021-04-26 14:10       ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2021-04-20 17:26 ` [PATCH v2 02/10] dt-bindings: arm-smmu: Add Tegra186 compatible string Thierry Reding
2021-04-20 17:26 ` [PATCH v2 03/10] iommu/arm-smmu: Implement ->probe_finalize() Thierry Reding
2021-04-20 17:26 ` [PATCH v2 04/10] iommu/arm-smmu: tegra: Detect number of instances at runtime Thierry Reding
2021-04-20 22:06   ` Krishna Reddy
2021-04-20 17:26 ` [PATCH v2 05/10] iommu/arm-smmu: tegra: Implement SID override programming Thierry Reding
2021-04-20 17:26 ` [PATCH v2 06/10] iommu/arm-smmu: Use Tegra implementation on Tegra186 Thierry Reding
2021-04-20 17:26 ` [PATCH v2 07/10] arm64: tegra: Use correct compatible string for Tegra186 SMMU Thierry Reding
2021-04-20 17:26 ` [PATCH v2 08/10] arm64: tegra: Hook up memory controller to SMMU on Tegra186 Thierry Reding
2021-04-20 17:26 ` [PATCH v2 09/10] arm64: tegra: Enable SMMU support on Tegra194 Thierry Reding
2021-04-20 17:26 ` [PATCH v2 10/10] arm64: tegra: Enable SMMU support for display " Thierry Reding
2021-05-28 17:05 ` [PATCH v2 00/10] arm64: tegra: Prevent early SMMU faults Thierry Reding
2021-06-01 12:26   ` Will Deacon
2021-06-01 18:08     ` Thierry Reding
2021-06-02  7:33       ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2021-06-02  7:35         ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2021-06-02  8:52           ` Thierry Reding
2021-06-02 10:44             ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2021-06-02 11:40               ` Will Deacon
2021-06-02 14:58                 ` Thierry Reding
2021-06-02 14:58                   ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2021-06-02 14:53               ` Thierry Reding
2021-06-02 14:57                 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=6cc79313-30b9-8223-b346-931ceea301d6@canonical.com \
    --to=krzysztof.kozlowski@canonical.com \
    --cc=iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=jonathanh@nvidia.com \
    --cc=joro@8bytes.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nicolinc@nvidia.com \
    --cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
    --cc=thierry.reding@gmail.com \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

Linux-ARM-Kernel Archive on lore.kernel.org

Archives are clonable:
	git clone --mirror https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-kernel/0 linux-arm-kernel/git/0.git
	git clone --mirror https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-kernel/1 linux-arm-kernel/git/1.git

	# If you have public-inbox 1.1+ installed, you may
	# initialize and index your mirror using the following commands:
	public-inbox-init -V2 linux-arm-kernel linux-arm-kernel/ https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-kernel \
		linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
	public-inbox-index linux-arm-kernel

Example config snippet for mirrors

Newsgroup available over NNTP:
	nntp://nntp.lore.kernel.org/org.infradead.lists.linux-arm-kernel


AGPL code for this site: git clone https://public-inbox.org/public-inbox.git