From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, NICE_REPLY_A,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D53BC433E2 for ; Thu, 10 Sep 2020 22:19:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from merlin.infradead.org (merlin.infradead.org [205.233.59.134]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 268ED208E4 for ; Thu, 10 Sep 2020 22:19:28 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lists.infradead.org header.i=@lists.infradead.org header.b="gKvlmeD3"; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key) header.d=nvidia.com header.i=@nvidia.com header.b="pf7Gb/6Y" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 268ED208E4 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=nvidia.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=merlin.20170209; h=Sender:Content-Type: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Cc:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post:List-Archive: List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Date:Message-ID:From: References:To:Subject:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=l4QOuLgun8wKl8R3HtzAV5DIygqYcYNtXlgKvZx3A9Y=; b=gKvlmeD3yo8VCIWiv+7ciR1F6 DtZC6oHEthivRpnTT3U63xnZ7z/NQyPSyv2Qz1aWq1RNui3BH+tjYMZFsIeMqJhpwc2PJDyNVLfwj qWmP3j0U4YNu1tck+3Rvh6EglpeVIW9RICskkb/4iVOfGPg2JHxWmt8nAlC9ciLXnxT1PqLQhNB7N G8PsvZR9Z90sn8dVvXcYhibimf25Q8/9jugMau3p+OwI5Uhvb3IjHM+y536bNwXMb0sMeGNJeoo0d 0n5qRMrWEuEhmXzu5Gx9H07DU5wCpHtMLhNgTpkb5/yHNILGYspk6z2o2pO/AdtOoc4NxjZBx3YFI VzANmCysw==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=merlin.infradead.org) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1kGUtO-00060k-1n; Thu, 10 Sep 2020 22:18:10 +0000 Received: from hqnvemgate26.nvidia.com ([216.228.121.65]) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1kGUtL-0005zf-QU; Thu, 10 Sep 2020 22:18:08 +0000 Received: from hqpgpgate102.nvidia.com (Not Verified[216.228.121.13]) by hqnvemgate26.nvidia.com (using TLS: TLSv1.2, DES-CBC3-SHA) id ; Thu, 10 Sep 2020 15:17:49 -0700 Received: from hqmail.nvidia.com ([172.20.161.6]) by hqpgpgate102.nvidia.com (PGP Universal service); Thu, 10 Sep 2020 15:18:02 -0700 X-PGP-Universal: processed; by hqpgpgate102.nvidia.com on Thu, 10 Sep 2020 15:18:02 -0700 Received: from [10.2.54.52] (10.124.1.5) by HQMAIL107.nvidia.com (172.20.187.13) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1473.3; Thu, 10 Sep 2020 22:17:55 +0000 Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 1/3] mm/gup: fix gup_fast with dynamic page table folding To: Jason Gunthorpe References: <20200907180058.64880-2-gerald.schaefer@linux.ibm.com> <0dbc6ec8-45ea-0853-4856-2bc1e661a5a5@intel.com> <20200909142904.00b72921@thinkpad> <20200909192534.442f8984@thinkpad> <20200909180324.GI87483@ziepe.ca> <20200910093925.GB29166@oc3871087118.ibm.com> <20200910181319.GO87483@ziepe.ca> <0c9bcb54-914b-e582-dd6d-3861267b6c94@nvidia.com> <20200910221116.GQ87483@ziepe.ca> From: John Hubbard Message-ID: <7188221f-37db-9792-4885-d2fa14ff894d@nvidia.com> Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2020 15:17:55 -0700 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.12.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20200910221116.GQ87483@ziepe.ca> X-Originating-IP: [10.124.1.5] X-ClientProxiedBy: HQMAIL101.nvidia.com (172.20.187.10) To HQMAIL107.nvidia.com (172.20.187.13) Content-Language: en-US DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=nvidia.com; s=n1; t=1599776269; bh=iwRoz1y5O8TbYdNUszhiA+vAQr7U9YxF7ekZoQ5W1Yk=; h=X-PGP-Universal:Subject:To:CC:References:From:Message-ID:Date: User-Agent:MIME-Version:In-Reply-To:X-Originating-IP: X-ClientProxiedBy:Content-Type:Content-Language: Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=pf7Gb/6YBDTqOCEDJuZ+rf4BfPFTGAk8OcLbOb7K+v6FIaG9RzNB0J3T6fe9quopL Z+ZPOoYzy+CPdC8eNfwxG52K013+7dFLb6XoB+71dt5jaaUjgW3/Yd+Qa0g/akV9fA tQooYBDWtKesVkRQCkYEkicElTFs+3GtpIu0ue7DQtpJI1f7AfE94uKLP6KsjC8rjc gBnPKFdEZZjBDt9zvqWyzMyouKLws8HP3qsfGIVfi7dffxmHX6EBFD/EhSz445AfW2 xdXCwOn/c+CRugCswXB9NnGL9VhGOiW9DFF76qT//6Pd4taPGNhkyd7b8sw4GeB8yW gUNk5AGewIISQ== X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20200910_181807_933649_CBB3A607 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 21.28 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Peter Zijlstra , Benjamin Herrenschmidt , Dave Hansen , Dave Hansen , Paul Mackerras , linux-sparc , Alexander Gordeev , Claudio Imbrenda , Will Deacon , linux-arch , linux-s390 , Vasily Gorbik , Richard Weinberger , linux-x86 , Russell King , Christian Borntraeger , Ingo Molnar , Catalin Marinas , Andrey Ryabinin , Gerald Schaefer , Heiko Carstens , Arnd Bergmann , Jeff Dike , linux-um , Borislav Petkov , Andy Lutomirski , Thomas Gleixner , linux-arm , linux-mm , linux-power , LKML , Michael Ellerman , Andrew Morton , Linus Torvalds , Mike Rapoport Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On 9/10/20 3:11 PM, Jason Gunthorpe wrote: > On Thu, Sep 10, 2020 at 02:22:37PM -0700, John Hubbard wrote: > >> Or am I way off here, and it really is possible (aside from the current >> s390 situation) to observe something that "is no longer a page table"? > > Yes, that is the issue. Remember there is no locking for GUP > fast. While a page table cannot be freed there is nothing preventing > the page table entry from being concurrently modified. > OK, then we are saying the same thing after all, good. > Without the stack variable it looks like this: > > pud_t pud = READ_ONCE(*pudp); > if (!pud_present(pud)) > return > pmd_offset(pudp, address); > > And pmd_offset() expands to > > return (pmd_t *)pud_page_vaddr(*pud) + pmd_index(address); > > Between the READ_ONCE(*pudp) and (*pud) inside pmd_offset() the value > of *pud can change, eg to !pud_present. > > Then pud_page_vaddr(*pud) will crash. It is not use after free, it > is using data that has not been validated. > Right, that matches what I had in mind, too: you can still have a problem even though you're in the same page table. I just wanted to confirm that there's not some odd way to launch out into completely non-page-table memory. thanks, -- John Hubbard NVIDIA _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel