From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.5 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, NICE_REPLY_A,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 85159C433E1 for ; Mon, 13 Jul 2020 14:46:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from merlin.infradead.org (merlin.infradead.org [205.233.59.134]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 51D9C20738 for ; Mon, 13 Jul 2020 14:46:04 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lists.infradead.org header.i=@lists.infradead.org header.b="eh5ubPHX"; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key) header.d=nvidia.com header.i=@nvidia.com header.b="X0D1DS8Q" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 51D9C20738 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=nvidia.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=merlin.20170209; h=Sender:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-Type:Cc:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post:List-Archive: List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Date:Message-ID:From: References:To:Subject:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=EFbqXvipDQbF1k9qBSQSkPc3dgXtbpXP0mJp6JzC2a4=; b=eh5ubPHXbT+c0JnEZ0AZ45GXv tZumpLJU4/wAmBVDBPsRggfOpwhTAcYzLGpowzVefStYQXVSg1YrkxL43mxtV7yKotAMHP+xdYX9R Kqo/aBlZEAmpfw7mD5WPCAQ2+tY7JN+y4XyUKjm4o8tTKgZz2s99ygtx4qseUB4cIqaQew6m2pszF o+lOWaIrtrpYeJy1YWcOYYfsP4hkSm/E1rk+A06+2a1pRpqNP0l1zioXshKSI4wfEac+m3bKV4BTA 1BfdMOVdELdcLokfEHArMYGmOUv++lMGeWuL6XwrDM6jR18MOUedHTkHCCfuJJ3f+ZkWdOJfxrWIN P8XtcAUpQ==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=merlin.infradead.org) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1juzh6-0005VF-Nj; Mon, 13 Jul 2020 14:44:36 +0000 Received: from hqnvemgate24.nvidia.com ([216.228.121.143]) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1juzgz-0005S8-5S for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Mon, 13 Jul 2020 14:44:30 +0000 Received: from hqpgpgate101.nvidia.com (Not Verified[216.228.121.13]) by hqnvemgate24.nvidia.com (using TLS: TLSv1.2, DES-CBC3-SHA) id ; Mon, 13 Jul 2020 07:42:36 -0700 Received: from hqmail.nvidia.com ([172.20.161.6]) by hqpgpgate101.nvidia.com (PGP Universal service); Mon, 13 Jul 2020 07:44:28 -0700 X-PGP-Universal: processed; by hqpgpgate101.nvidia.com on Mon, 13 Jul 2020 07:44:28 -0700 Received: from [10.26.72.101] (10.124.1.5) by HQMAIL107.nvidia.com (172.20.187.13) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1473.3; Mon, 13 Jul 2020 14:44:18 +0000 Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] arm64: tlb: Use the TLBI RANGE feature in arm64 To: Zhenyu Ye , , , , , , , References: <20200710094420.517-1-yezhenyu2@huawei.com> <20200710094420.517-3-yezhenyu2@huawei.com> <4040f429-21c8-0825-2ad4-97786c3fe7c1@nvidia.com> From: Jon Hunter Message-ID: <7237888d-2168-cd8b-c83d-c8e54871793d@nvidia.com> Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2020 15:44:16 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: X-Originating-IP: [10.124.1.5] X-ClientProxiedBy: HQMAIL105.nvidia.com (172.20.187.12) To HQMAIL107.nvidia.com (172.20.187.13) Content-Language: en-US DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=nvidia.com; s=n1; t=1594651356; bh=GMqdGNMQAH4AHg5hTa7waqJrHwyKyA4TXJmzHNKG13w=; h=X-PGP-Universal:Subject:To:CC:References:From:Message-ID:Date: User-Agent:MIME-Version:In-Reply-To:X-Originating-IP: X-ClientProxiedBy:Content-Type:Content-Language: Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=X0D1DS8Q43SgE5F9IDdU432zVIipKfOXH09pQUdZ9nwA/5YJw5NgTcaeOTeDp1MbU ZtFrObX3/F6AItK2Kaz/Jdj5ln5HbEbuqjOpJwaB97qoVpRmi4eRHG0RAgY/w+qBO6 O83/VWEQOAHYks9bxeUkSDB0FMoXhXsn4MX9rmJ2TcqXT1xdefUZgAVlGNDLe2vAMI LHblN/7vNqKTDmUaPDmThJlWenrobGwK1npattjHleKBjjVrwIU8LIRTbCPFjgveeQ ljgVMQFJWxJBsbLsK8mvDDjQE2jrZ6uET1MeXoy3Vy2Y3ZM78D81s9qTAwEGsOEGbC E7AzNNZBDWqDw== X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20200713_104429_356086_C71E356E X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 12.42 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, xiexiangyou@huawei.com, zhangshaokun@hisilicon.com, linux-mm@kvack.org, arm@kernel.org, prime.zeng@hisilicon.com, linux-tegra , kuhn.chenqun@huawei.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On 13/07/2020 15:39, Zhenyu Ye wrote: > Hi Jon, > > On 2020/7/13 22:27, Jon Hunter wrote: >> After this change I am seeing the following build errors ... >> >> /tmp/cckzq3FT.s: Assembler messages: >> /tmp/cckzq3FT.s:854: Error: unknown or missing operation name at operand 1 -- `tlbi rvae1is,x7' >> /tmp/cckzq3FT.s:870: Error: unknown or missing operation name at operand 1 -- `tlbi rvae1is,x7' >> /tmp/cckzq3FT.s:1095: Error: unknown or missing operation name at operand 1 -- `tlbi rvae1is,x7' >> /tmp/cckzq3FT.s:1111: Error: unknown or missing operation name at operand 1 -- `tlbi rvae1is,x7' >> /tmp/cckzq3FT.s:1964: Error: unknown or missing operation name at operand 1 -- `tlbi rvae1is,x7' >> /tmp/cckzq3FT.s:1980: Error: unknown or missing operation name at operand 1 -- `tlbi rvae1is,x7' >> /tmp/cckzq3FT.s:2286: Error: unknown or missing operation name at operand 1 -- `tlbi rvae1is,x7' >> /tmp/cckzq3FT.s:2302: Error: unknown or missing operation name at operand 1 -- `tlbi rvae1is,x7' >> /tmp/cckzq3FT.s:4833: Error: unknown or missing operation name at operand 1 -- `tlbi rvae1is,x6' >> /tmp/cckzq3FT.s:4849: Error: unknown or missing operation name at operand 1 -- `tlbi rvae1is,x6' >> /tmp/cckzq3FT.s:5090: Error: unknown or missing operation name at operand 1 -- `tlbi rvae1is,x6' >> /tmp/cckzq3FT.s:5106: Error: unknown or missing operation name at operand 1 -- `tlbi rvae1is,x6' >> /tmp/cckzq3FT.s:874: Error: attempt to move .org backwards >> /tmp/cckzq3FT.s:1115: Error: attempt to move .org backwards >> /tmp/cckzq3FT.s:1984: Error: attempt to move .org backwards >> /tmp/cckzq3FT.s:2306: Error: attempt to move .org backwards >> /tmp/cckzq3FT.s:4853: Error: attempt to move .org backwards >> /tmp/cckzq3FT.s:5110: Error: attempt to move .org backwards >> scripts/Makefile.build:280: recipe for target 'arch/arm64/mm/hugetlbpage.o' failed >> make[3]: *** [arch/arm64/mm/hugetlbpage.o] Error 1 >> scripts/Makefile.build:497: recipe for target 'arch/arm64/mm' failed >> make[2]: *** [arch/arm64/mm] Error 2 >> >> Cheers >> Jon >> > > The code must be built with binutils >= 2.30. > Maybe I should add a check on whether binutils supports ARMv8.4-a instructions... Yes I believe so. Cheers Jon -- nvpublic _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel