From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.2 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, NICE_REPLY_A,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A3ABC433E0 for ; Fri, 31 Jul 2020 18:25:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from merlin.infradead.org (merlin.infradead.org [205.233.59.134]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7269B22B42 for ; Fri, 31 Jul 2020 18:25:49 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lists.infradead.org header.i=@lists.infradead.org header.b="eJTHMTTv"; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=ti.com header.i=@ti.com header.b="GxaFQAVR" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 7269B22B42 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=ti.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=merlin.20170209; h=Sender:Content-Type: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Cc:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post:List-Archive: List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Date:Message-ID:From: References:To:Subject:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=gVjJ8rV2DGHs3subKGptvWbwih/v3wMtnHD6b00jxg8=; b=eJTHMTTv07WuBXKW8//UJ26PF CuCUFXrwgE94rCLLO7iSvJdvUF/V7/3tt+2jtc4WMfmD5RAf/exsUrXfvO7SmLoi2RB6R7e7MxsjU gWDc8DSopyWAg8p8J4UXsPuo/hBdMgQQyLFZRq4JDHgU2NNEhnBkbyOodQBiZXDTrnKyW9mOqpMmw k8COn4wnKuxE+/VSPQQRJhIaaUQdVjNKCF4b76ygbjvGheMkwJ+dunyH2/X/DqvBptgCSYSjTWBYQ o1r0hVjRoSLOhPQHxWm4sxEEy7NG7d+eCJKR+0ZZKY941IaWo6XOekKS7BlJ1mm+ZqltfzrsawF9w 4lBmRwYUw==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=merlin.infradead.org) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1k1Zhi-00032q-SY; Fri, 31 Jul 2020 18:24:26 +0000 Received: from lelv0142.ext.ti.com ([198.47.23.249]) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1k1Zhf-00032Q-VQ for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Fri, 31 Jul 2020 18:24:24 +0000 Received: from lelv0265.itg.ti.com ([10.180.67.224]) by lelv0142.ext.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 06VIOIDp042321; Fri, 31 Jul 2020 13:24:18 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ti.com; s=ti-com-17Q1; t=1596219858; bh=Q4sB5JsOZu0IoX+j8z1C39WAET3Gz/Fy0CLyBNmJLO0=; h=Subject:To:CC:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To; b=GxaFQAVRltzw/tSGUmtUfuIyFXLpcvO/eAjnY023j9t5otTnDx0aBNdIf/F2iVW97 grpIgprSjkifeX6DzMOzL/hOEWXZeCSnx9G8Bgn3QZlQIL2cZ788gLoVfevbM0E7/E +u+9lRnPQ0iSE5bgyR3nM/S3Rv3ZJXTh0rk/FZ7o= Received: from DLEE113.ent.ti.com (dlee113.ent.ti.com [157.170.170.24]) by lelv0265.itg.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id 06VIOI89065067 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=FAIL); Fri, 31 Jul 2020 13:24:18 -0500 Received: from DLEE111.ent.ti.com (157.170.170.22) by DLEE113.ent.ti.com (157.170.170.24) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.1979.3; Fri, 31 Jul 2020 13:24:17 -0500 Received: from fllv0040.itg.ti.com (10.64.41.20) by DLEE111.ent.ti.com (157.170.170.22) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.1979.3 via Frontend Transport; Fri, 31 Jul 2020 13:24:17 -0500 Received: from [10.250.34.248] (ileax41-snat.itg.ti.com [10.172.224.153]) by fllv0040.itg.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 06VIOHag073540; Fri, 31 Jul 2020 13:24:17 -0500 Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 00/10] irqchip: ti, sci-intr/inta: Update the dt bindings to accept different interrupt parents To: Rob Herring , Marc Zyngier References: <20200728051735.6187-1-lokeshvutla@ti.com> <20200731181658.GA500828@bogus> From: Suman Anna Message-ID: <733bbcdc-8d29-51cc-f16e-7f95abb56ff2@ti.com> Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2020 13:24:17 -0500 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.10.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20200731181658.GA500828@bogus> Content-Language: en-US X-EXCLAIMER-MD-CONFIG: e1e8a2fd-e40a-4ac6-ac9b-f7e9cc9ee180 X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20200731_142424_124626_51CB0910 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 21.91 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Nishanth Menon , Peter Ujfalusi , Grygorii Strashko , Device Tree Mailing List , Lokesh Vutla , Sekhar Nori , Bjorn Andersson , Tero Kristo , Santosh Shilimkar , Thomas Gleixner , Linux ARM Mailing List Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On 7/31/20 1:16 PM, Rob Herring wrote: > On Fri, Jul 31, 2020 at 06:01:50PM +0100, Marc Zyngier wrote: >> On 2020-07-28 06:17, Lokesh Vutla wrote: >>> Hi Marc, >>> This is continuation of the RFC patches[0] regarding the driver >>> updates to support for following interrupt parent connection: >>> - INTR -> INTR >>> - INTA -> GICv3 >>> The current existing driver assumes that INTR is always connected to >>> GICv3 and INTA is always connected to INTR. >> >> I'm OK to take this if I can get an Ack from RobH on the three >> DT patches that still need it. > > Reviewed-by: Rob Herring > > However, there's a dependency on > bindings/arm/keystone/ti,k3-sci-common.yaml. > > That's a dependency on this being merged. I don't care if it breaks in > your tree, but I care for -next and Linus' tree. There could also be > other 'make dt_bindings_check' failures/warnings with this as the above > dependency prevents further testing. > Bjorn did pick up the above common binding file through the remoteproc tree, and it is available in -next. That said, I donno the merge order between remoteproc and irq subsystem trees into -next, and if that is a concern. regards Suman _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel