Re: [RESEND PATCH 0/5] Add bluetooth support for Orange Pi 3

From: Marcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
To: Maxime Ripard <mripard@kernel.org>
Cc: megous@megous.com, Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	Johan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@gmail.com>,
	devicetree@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org,
	Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@csie.org>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH 0/5] Add bluetooth support for Orange Pi 3
Date: Wed, 4 Sep 2019 16:19:37 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <76FD40C7-10C5-4818-8EF9-60326ECA4243@holtmann.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190830132034.u65arlv7umh64lx6@flea>

Hi Maxime,

>>>>> (Resend to add missing lists, sorry for the noise.)
>>>>> 
>>>>> This series implements bluetooth support for Xunlong Orange Pi 3 board.
>>>>> 
>>>>> The board uses AP6256 WiFi/BT 5.0 chip.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Summary of changes:
>>>>> 
>>>>> - add more delay to let initialize the chip
>>>>> - let the kernel detect firmware file path
>>>>> - add new compatible and update dt-bindings
>>>>> - update Orange Pi 3 / H6 DTS
>>>>> 
>>>>> Please take a look.
>>>>> 
>>>>> thank you and regards,
>>>>> Ondrej Jirman
>>>>> 
>>>>> Ondrej Jirman (5):
>>>>> dt-bindings: net: Add compatible for BCM4345C5 bluetooth device
>>>>> bluetooth: bcm: Add support for loading firmware for BCM4345C5
>>>>> bluetooth: hci_bcm: Give more time to come out of reset
>>>>> arm64: dts: allwinner: h6: Add pin configs for uart1
>>>>> arm64: dts: allwinner: orange-pi-3: Enable UART1 / Bluetooth
>>>>> 
>>>>> .../bindings/net/broadcom-bluetooth.txt       |  1 +
>>>>> .../dts/allwinner/sun50i-h6-orangepi-3.dts    | 19 +++++++++++++++++++
>>>>> arch/arm64/boot/dts/allwinner/sun50i-h6.dtsi  | 10 ++++++++++
>>>>> drivers/bluetooth/btbcm.c                     |  3 +++
>>>>> drivers/bluetooth/hci_bcm.c                   |  3 ++-
>>>>> 5 files changed, 35 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>> 
>>>> all 5 patches have been applied to bluetooth-next tree.
>>> 
>>> The DTS patches (last 2) should go through the arm-soc tree, can you
>>> drop them?
>> 
>> why is that? We have included DTS changes for Bluetooth devices
>> directly all the time. What is different with this hardware?
> 
> I guess some maintainers are more relaxed with it than we are then,
> but for the why, well, it's the usual reasons, the most immediate one
> being that it reduces to a minimum the conflicts between trees.
> 
> The other being that it's not really usual to merge patches supposed
> to be handled by another maintainer without (at least) his
> consent. I'm pretty sure you would have asked the same request if I
> would have merged the bluetooth patches through my tree without
> notice.

I took the two DTS patches out now and let the submitter deal with getting these merged.

Regards

Marcel

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel