From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-16.0 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_CR_TRAILER, INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,NICE_REPLY_A,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BFDC7C433E6 for ; Wed, 10 Feb 2021 17:46:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from merlin.infradead.org (merlin.infradead.org [205.233.59.134]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7D89964ED0 for ; Wed, 10 Feb 2021 17:46:07 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 7D89964ED0 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=arm.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=merlin.20170209; h=Sender:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-Type:Cc:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post:List-Archive: List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Date:Message-ID:From: References:To:Subject:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=Bievp+mLMm9dKB5ba+fZEeyisihwkCLO8hf++wf9KIw=; b=Ui2s1FM7DQs/TxKBu3ID+xjDl ArqExk53n31rF9AL0tH47IVtInwd+soR0HhpFXzVa4z913eWkuuBKMJ4yn5ZSjQTjk9VHx5lmFAFz dSHrPbOhyylqbAzYKkjQwAXM5Mt8QLJpQbP8aBJXuWNp0hSE7wzoE1143no8S4Y42SwvaaIuctMqK s+XAUJ/axj937S4REGdiVmncRsZ/amv/uxiWWccFjTG/l6QE5QHeaiB8nXJubQNAZ1awjarJIarxm CCNV0Z8+R5OJYLOMZRI8OmdWszVGOUkRTis5LiunrDI8PijyKpBUjU5zcz5OowHJl0AORwP7qif52 2faNgiSYQ==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=merlin.infradead.org) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1l9tXm-00074E-LZ; Wed, 10 Feb 2021 17:44:50 +0000 Received: from foss.arm.com ([217.140.110.172]) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1l9tXi-00073T-16 for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Wed, 10 Feb 2021 17:44:47 +0000 Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F97511D4; Wed, 10 Feb 2021 09:44:44 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.0.110] (unknown [172.31.20.19]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 748FA3F73B; Wed, 10 Feb 2021 09:44:43 -0800 (PST) Subject: Re: [PATCH kvmtool 01/21] ioport: Remove ioport__setup_arch() To: Andre Przywara , Will Deacon , Julien Thierry References: <20201210142908.169597-1-andre.przywara@arm.com> <20201210142908.169597-2-andre.przywara@arm.com> From: Alexandru Elisei Message-ID: <814e0cd9-5e54-fade-f05c-80ea2b4a9039@arm.com> Date: Wed, 10 Feb 2021 17:44:59 +0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20201210142908.169597-2-andre.przywara@arm.com> Content-Language: en-US X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20210210_124446_251604_C047D840 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 22.95 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Marc Zyngier , kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, kvm@vger.kernel.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org Hi Andre, On 12/10/20 2:28 PM, Andre Przywara wrote: > Since x86 had a special need for registering tons of special I/O ports, > we had an ioport__setup_arch() callback, to allow each architecture > to do the same. As it turns out no one uses it beside x86, so we remove > that unnecessary abstraction. > > The generic function was registered via a device_base_init() call, so > we just do the same for the x86 specific function only, and can remove > the unneeded ioport__setup_arch(). > > Signed-off-by: Andre Przywara > --- > arm/ioport.c | 5 ----- > include/kvm/ioport.h | 1 - > ioport.c | 28 ---------------------------- > mips/kvm.c | 5 ----- > powerpc/ioport.c | 6 ------ > x86/ioport.c | 25 ++++++++++++++++++++++++- > 6 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 46 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/arm/ioport.c b/arm/ioport.c > index 2f0feb9a..24092c9d 100644 > --- a/arm/ioport.c > +++ b/arm/ioport.c > @@ -1,11 +1,6 @@ > #include "kvm/ioport.h" > #include "kvm/irq.h" > > -int ioport__setup_arch(struct kvm *kvm) > -{ > - return 0; > -} > - > void ioport__map_irq(u8 *irq) > { > *irq = irq__alloc_line(); > diff --git a/include/kvm/ioport.h b/include/kvm/ioport.h > index 039633f7..d0213541 100644 > --- a/include/kvm/ioport.h > +++ b/include/kvm/ioport.h > @@ -35,7 +35,6 @@ struct ioport_operations { > enum irq_type)); > }; > > -int ioport__setup_arch(struct kvm *kvm); > void ioport__map_irq(u8 *irq); > > int __must_check ioport__register(struct kvm *kvm, u16 port, struct ioport_operations *ops, > diff --git a/ioport.c b/ioport.c > index 844a832d..667e8386 100644 > --- a/ioport.c > +++ b/ioport.c > @@ -158,21 +158,6 @@ int ioport__unregister(struct kvm *kvm, u16 port) > return 0; > } > > -static void ioport__unregister_all(void) > -{ > - struct ioport *entry; > - struct rb_node *rb; > - struct rb_int_node *rb_node; > - > - rb = rb_first(&ioport_tree); > - while (rb) { > - rb_node = rb_int(rb); > - entry = ioport_node(rb_node); > - ioport_unregister(&ioport_tree, entry); > - rb = rb_first(&ioport_tree); > - } > -} I get the impression this is a rebasing artifact. The commit message doesn't mention anything about removing ioport__exit() -> ioport__unregister_all(), and as far as I can tell it's still needed because there are places other than ioport__setup_arch() from where ioport__register() is called. Thanks, Alex > - > static const char *to_direction(int direction) > { > if (direction == KVM_EXIT_IO_IN) > @@ -220,16 +205,3 @@ out: > > return !kvm->cfg.ioport_debug; > } > - > -int ioport__init(struct kvm *kvm) > -{ > - return ioport__setup_arch(kvm); > -} > -dev_base_init(ioport__init); > - > -int ioport__exit(struct kvm *kvm) > -{ > - ioport__unregister_all(); > - return 0; > -} > -dev_base_exit(ioport__exit); > diff --git a/mips/kvm.c b/mips/kvm.c > index 26355930..e110e5d5 100644 > --- a/mips/kvm.c > +++ b/mips/kvm.c > @@ -100,11 +100,6 @@ void kvm__irq_trigger(struct kvm *kvm, int irq) > die_perror("KVM_IRQ_LINE ioctl"); > } > > -int ioport__setup_arch(struct kvm *kvm) > -{ > - return 0; > -} > - > bool kvm__arch_cpu_supports_vm(void) > { > return true; > diff --git a/powerpc/ioport.c b/powerpc/ioport.c > index 0c188b61..a5cff4ee 100644 > --- a/powerpc/ioport.c > +++ b/powerpc/ioport.c > @@ -12,12 +12,6 @@ > > #include > > -int ioport__setup_arch(struct kvm *kvm) > -{ > - /* PPC has no legacy ioports to set up */ > - return 0; > -} > - > void ioport__map_irq(u8 *irq) > { > } > diff --git a/x86/ioport.c b/x86/ioport.c > index 7ad7b8f3..8c5c7699 100644 > --- a/x86/ioport.c > +++ b/x86/ioport.c > @@ -69,7 +69,7 @@ void ioport__map_irq(u8 *irq) > { > } > > -int ioport__setup_arch(struct kvm *kvm) > +static int ioport__setup_arch(struct kvm *kvm) > { > int r; > > @@ -150,3 +150,26 @@ int ioport__setup_arch(struct kvm *kvm) > > return 0; > } > +dev_base_init(ioport__setup_arch); > + > +static int ioport__remove_arch(struct kvm *kvm) > +{ > + ioport__unregister(kvm, 0x510); > + ioport__unregister(kvm, 0x402); > + ioport__unregister(kvm, 0x03D5); > + ioport__unregister(kvm, 0x03D4); > + ioport__unregister(kvm, 0x0378); > + ioport__unregister(kvm, 0x0278); > + ioport__unregister(kvm, 0x00F0); > + ioport__unregister(kvm, 0x00ED); > + ioport__unregister(kvm, IOPORT_DBG); > + ioport__unregister(kvm, 0x00C0); > + ioport__unregister(kvm, 0x00A0); > + ioport__unregister(kvm, 0x0092); > + ioport__unregister(kvm, 0x0040); > + ioport__unregister(kvm, 0x0020); > + ioport__unregister(kvm, 0x0000); > + > + return 0; > +} > +dev_base_exit(ioport__remove_arch); _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel