linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>
To: Gerald Schaefer <gerald.schaefer@linux.ibm.com>,
	Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca>,
	John Hubbard <jhubbard@nvidia.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
	linux-mm <linux-mm@kvack.org>, Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
	linux-sparc <sparclinux@vger.kernel.org>,
	Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@linux.ibm.com>,
	Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@linux.ibm.com>,
	Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	linux-arch <linux-arch@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-s390 <linux-s390@vger.kernel.org>,
	Vasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com>,
	Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>, linux-x86 <x86@kernel.org>,
	Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
	Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	Andrey Ryabinin <aryabinin@virtuozzo.com>,
	Jeff Dike <jdike@addtoit.com>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
	Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>,
	linux-um <linux-um@lists.infradead.org>,
	Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>, Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	linux-arm <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	linux-power <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>,
	Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 1/3] mm/gup: fix gup_fast with dynamic page table folding
Date: Tue, 8 Sep 2020 07:06:23 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <82fbe8f9-f199-5fc2-4168-eb43ad0b0346@csgroup.eu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200907180058.64880-2-gerald.schaefer@linux.ibm.com>



Le 07/09/2020 à 20:00, Gerald Schaefer a écrit :
> From: Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@linux.ibm.com>
> 
> Commit 1a42010cdc26 ("s390/mm: convert to the generic get_user_pages_fast
> code") introduced a subtle but severe bug on s390 with gup_fast, due to
> dynamic page table folding.
> 
> The question "What would it require for the generic code to work for s390"
> has already been discussed here
> https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190418100218.0a4afd51@mschwideX1
> and ended with a promising approach here
> https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190419153307.4f2911b5@mschwideX1
> which in the end unfortunately didn't quite work completely.
> 
> We tried to mimic static level folding by changing pgd_offset to always
> calculate top level page table offset, and do nothing in folded pXd_offset.
> What has been overlooked is that PxD_SIZE/MASK and thus pXd_addr_end do
> not reflect this dynamic behaviour, and still act like static 5-level
> page tables.
> 

[...]

> 
> Fix this by introducing new pXd_addr_end_folded helpers, which take an
> additional pXd entry value parameter, that can be used on s390
> to determine the correct page table level and return corresponding
> end / boundary. With that, the pointer iteration will always
> happen in gup_pgd_range for s390. No change for other architectures
> introduced.

Not sure pXd_addr_end_folded() is the best understandable name, 
allthough I don't have any alternative suggestion at the moment.
Maybe could be something like pXd_addr_end_fixup() as it will disappear 
in the next patch, or pXd_addr_end_gup() ?

Also, if it happens to be acceptable to get patch 2 in stable, I think 
you should switch patch 1 and patch 2 to avoid the step through 
pXd_addr_end_folded()


> 
> Fixes: 1a42010cdc26 ("s390/mm: convert to the generic get_user_pages_fast code")
> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 5.2+
> Reviewed-by: Gerald Schaefer <gerald.schaefer@linux.ibm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@linux.ibm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Gerald Schaefer <gerald.schaefer@linux.ibm.com>
> ---
>   arch/s390/include/asm/pgtable.h | 42 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>   include/linux/pgtable.h         | 16 +++++++++++++
>   mm/gup.c                        |  8 +++----
>   3 files changed, 62 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/s390/include/asm/pgtable.h b/arch/s390/include/asm/pgtable.h
> index 7eb01a5459cd..027206e4959d 100644
> --- a/arch/s390/include/asm/pgtable.h
> +++ b/arch/s390/include/asm/pgtable.h
> @@ -512,6 +512,48 @@ static inline bool mm_pmd_folded(struct mm_struct *mm)
>   }
>   #define mm_pmd_folded(mm) mm_pmd_folded(mm)
>   
> +/*
> + * With dynamic page table levels on s390, the static pXd_addr_end() functions
> + * will not return corresponding dynamic boundaries. This is no problem as long
> + * as only pXd pointers are passed down during page table walk, because
> + * pXd_offset() will simply return the given pointer for folded levels, and the
> + * pointer iteration over a range simply happens at the correct page table
> + * level.
> + * It is however a problem with gup_fast, or other places walking the page
> + * tables w/o locks using READ_ONCE(), and passing down the pXd values instead
> + * of pointers. In this case, the pointer given to pXd_offset() is a pointer to
> + * a stack variable, which cannot be used for pointer iteration at the correct
> + * level. Instead, the iteration then has to happen by going up to pgd level
> + * again. To allow this, provide pXd_addr_end_folded() functions with an
> + * additional pXd value parameter, which can be used on s390 to determine the
> + * folding level and return the corresponding boundary.
> + */
> +static inline unsigned long rste_addr_end_folded(unsigned long rste, unsigned long addr, unsigned long end)

What does 'rste' stands for ?

Isn't this line a bit long ?

> +{
> +	unsigned long type = (rste & _REGION_ENTRY_TYPE_MASK) >> 2;
> +	unsigned long size = 1UL << (_SEGMENT_SHIFT + type * 11);
> +	unsigned long boundary = (addr + size) & ~(size - 1);
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * FIXME The below check is for internal testing only, to be removed
> +	 */
> +	VM_BUG_ON(type < (_REGION_ENTRY_TYPE_R3 >> 2));
> +
> +	return (boundary - 1) < (end - 1) ? boundary : end;
> +}
> +
> +#define pgd_addr_end_folded pgd_addr_end_folded
> +static inline unsigned long pgd_addr_end_folded(pgd_t pgd, unsigned long addr, unsigned long end)
> +{
> +	return rste_addr_end_folded(pgd_val(pgd), addr, end);
> +}
> +
> +#define p4d_addr_end_folded p4d_addr_end_folded
> +static inline unsigned long p4d_addr_end_folded(p4d_t p4d, unsigned long addr, unsigned long end)
> +{
> +	return rste_addr_end_folded(p4d_val(p4d), addr, end);
> +}
> +
>   static inline int mm_has_pgste(struct mm_struct *mm)
>   {
>   #ifdef CONFIG_PGSTE
> diff --git a/include/linux/pgtable.h b/include/linux/pgtable.h
> index e8cbc2e795d5..981c4c2a31fe 100644
> --- a/include/linux/pgtable.h
> +++ b/include/linux/pgtable.h
> @@ -681,6 +681,22 @@ static inline int arch_unmap_one(struct mm_struct *mm,
>   })
>   #endif
>   
> +#ifndef pgd_addr_end_folded
> +#define pgd_addr_end_folded(pgd, addr, end)	pgd_addr_end(addr, end)
> +#endif
> +
> +#ifndef p4d_addr_end_folded
> +#define p4d_addr_end_folded(p4d, addr, end)	p4d_addr_end(addr, end)
> +#endif
> +
> +#ifndef pud_addr_end_folded
> +#define pud_addr_end_folded(pud, addr, end)	pud_addr_end(addr, end)
> +#endif
> +
> +#ifndef pmd_addr_end_folded
> +#define pmd_addr_end_folded(pmd, addr, end)	pmd_addr_end(addr, end)
> +#endif
> +
>   /*
>    * When walking page tables, we usually want to skip any p?d_none entries;
>    * and any p?d_bad entries - reporting the error before resetting to none.
> diff --git a/mm/gup.c b/mm/gup.c
> index bd883a112724..ba4aace5d0f4 100644
> --- a/mm/gup.c
> +++ b/mm/gup.c
> @@ -2521,7 +2521,7 @@ static int gup_pmd_range(pud_t pud, unsigned long addr, unsigned long end,
>   	do {
>   		pmd_t pmd = READ_ONCE(*pmdp);
>   
> -		next = pmd_addr_end(addr, end);
> +		next = pmd_addr_end_folded(pmd, addr, end);
>   		if (!pmd_present(pmd))
>   			return 0;
>   
> @@ -2564,7 +2564,7 @@ static int gup_pud_range(p4d_t p4d, unsigned long addr, unsigned long end,
>   	do {
>   		pud_t pud = READ_ONCE(*pudp);
>   
> -		next = pud_addr_end(addr, end);
> +		next = pud_addr_end_folded(pud, addr, end);
>   		if (unlikely(!pud_present(pud)))
>   			return 0;
>   		if (unlikely(pud_huge(pud))) {
> @@ -2592,7 +2592,7 @@ static int gup_p4d_range(pgd_t pgd, unsigned long addr, unsigned long end,
>   	do {
>   		p4d_t p4d = READ_ONCE(*p4dp);
>   
> -		next = p4d_addr_end(addr, end);
> +		next = p4d_addr_end_folded(p4d, addr, end);
>   		if (p4d_none(p4d))
>   			return 0;
>   		BUILD_BUG_ON(p4d_huge(p4d));
> @@ -2617,7 +2617,7 @@ static void gup_pgd_range(unsigned long addr, unsigned long end,
>   	do {
>   		pgd_t pgd = READ_ONCE(*pgdp);
>   
> -		next = pgd_addr_end(addr, end);
> +		next = pgd_addr_end_folded(pgd, addr, end);
>   		if (pgd_none(pgd))
>   			return;
>   		if (unlikely(pgd_huge(pgd))) {
> 

Christophe

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

  reply	other threads:[~2020-09-08  5:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 62+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-09-07 18:00 [RFC PATCH v2 0/3] mm/gup: fix gup_fast with dynamic page table folding Gerald Schaefer
2020-09-07 18:00 ` [RFC PATCH v2 1/3] " Gerald Schaefer
2020-09-08  5:06   ` Christophe Leroy [this message]
2020-09-08 12:09     ` Christian Borntraeger
2020-09-08 12:40       ` Christophe Leroy
2020-09-08 13:38         ` Gerald Schaefer
2020-09-08 14:30   ` Dave Hansen
2020-09-08 17:59     ` Gerald Schaefer
2020-09-09 12:29     ` Gerald Schaefer
2020-09-09 16:18       ` Dave Hansen
2020-09-09 17:25         ` Gerald Schaefer
2020-09-09 18:03           ` Jason Gunthorpe
2020-09-10  9:39             ` Alexander Gordeev
2020-09-10 13:02               ` Jason Gunthorpe
2020-09-10 13:28                 ` Gerald Schaefer
2020-09-10 15:10                   ` Jason Gunthorpe
2020-09-10 17:07                     ` Gerald Schaefer
2020-09-10 17:19                       ` Jason Gunthorpe
2020-09-10 17:57                 ` Gerald Schaefer
2020-09-10 23:21                   ` Jason Gunthorpe
2020-09-10 17:35               ` Linus Torvalds
2020-09-10 18:13                 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2020-09-10 18:33                   ` Linus Torvalds
2020-09-10 19:10                     ` Gerald Schaefer
2020-09-10 19:32                       ` Linus Torvalds
2020-09-10 21:59                         ` Jason Gunthorpe
2020-09-11  7:09                           ` peterz
2020-09-11 11:19                             ` Jason Gunthorpe
2020-09-11 19:03                             ` [PATCH] " Vasily Gorbik
2020-09-11 19:09                               ` Linus Torvalds
2020-09-11 19:40                               ` Jason Gunthorpe
2020-09-11 20:05                                 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2020-09-11 20:36                                   ` [PATCH v2] " Vasily Gorbik
2020-09-15 17:09                                     ` Vasily Gorbik
2020-09-15 17:14                                     ` Jason Gunthorpe
2020-09-15 17:18                                     ` Mike Rapoport
2020-09-15 17:31                                     ` John Hubbard
2020-09-10 21:22                   ` [RFC PATCH v2 1/3] " John Hubbard
2020-09-10 22:11                     ` Jason Gunthorpe
2020-09-10 22:17                       ` John Hubbard
2020-09-11 12:19                       ` Alexander Gordeev
2020-09-11 16:45                         ` Linus Torvalds
2020-09-10 13:11             ` Gerald Schaefer
2020-09-07 18:00 ` [RFC PATCH v2 2/3] mm: make pXd_addr_end() functions page-table entry aware Gerald Schaefer
2020-09-08  5:14   ` Christophe Leroy
2020-09-08  7:46     ` Alexander Gordeev
2020-09-08  8:16       ` Christophe Leroy
2020-09-08 14:15         ` Alexander Gordeev
2020-09-09  8:38           ` Christophe Leroy
2020-09-08 14:25     ` Alexander Gordeev
2020-09-08 13:26   ` Jason Gunthorpe
2020-09-08 14:33   ` Dave Hansen
2020-09-07 18:00 ` [RFC PATCH v2 3/3] mm: make generic pXd_addr_end() macros inline functions Gerald Schaefer
2020-09-07 20:15   ` Mike Rapoport
2020-09-08  5:19   ` Christophe Leroy
2020-09-08 15:48     ` Alexander Gordeev
2020-09-08 17:20       ` Christophe Leroy
2020-09-07 20:12 ` [RFC PATCH v2 0/3] mm/gup: fix gup_fast with dynamic page table folding Mike Rapoport
2020-09-08  5:22   ` Christophe Leroy
2020-09-08 17:36     ` Gerald Schaefer
2020-09-09 16:12       ` Gerald Schaefer
2020-09-08  4:42 ` Christophe Leroy

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=82fbe8f9-f199-5fc2-4168-eb43ad0b0346@csgroup.eu \
    --to=christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu \
    --cc=agordeev@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=aryabinin@virtuozzo.com \
    --cc=borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=gerald.schaefer@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=gor@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=hca@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=imbrenda@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=jdike@addtoit.com \
    --cc=jgg@ziepe.ca \
    --cc=jhubbard@nvidia.com \
    --cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-um@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=luto@kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=paulus@samba.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=richard@nod.at \
    --cc=rppt@kernel.org \
    --cc=sparclinux@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).