linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: bharat.kumar.gogada@xilinx.com (Bharat Kumar Gogada)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Memory and IO space Enabling different in x86 and ARM64
Date: Sat, 16 Jul 2016 03:25:04 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <8520D5D51A55D047800579B094147198258B98C5@XAP-PVEXMBX01.xlnx.xilinx.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160715214757.GA1706@localhost>

> Subject: Re: Memory and IO space Enabling different in x86 and ARM64
>
> On Fri, Jul 15, 2016 at 08:29:49AM +0000, Bharat Kumar Gogada wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I observe that memory and IO space are enabled by BIOS in x86.
> >
> > In ARM64 we need to call pci_enable_device form End Point to enable
> these resources.
> >
> > Why the resource enablement is different in x86 and ARM64 ?
>
> A portable driver should call pci_enable_device() if it needs access
> to any BARs.  As you've observed, the command register enable bits may
> be set differently on different architectures, and the PCI core
> doesn't set them automatically for you, so the driver can't rely on
> their initial settings.
>
> One reason why Linux doesn't enable them automatically before calling
> the driver's probe method is that it may not be possible to allocate
> space for all the BARs (e.g., if the platform doesn't support I/O port
> space, or if we just run out of space), but the driver may be able to
> operate the device even without all the BARs.
>
Thanks Bjorn


This email and any attachments are intended for the sole use of the named recipient(s) and contain(s) confidential information that may be proprietary, privileged or copyrighted under applicable law. If you are not the intended recipient, do not read, copy, or forward this email message or any attachments. Delete this email message and any attachments immediately.

      reply	other threads:[~2016-07-16  3:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-07-15  8:29 Memory and IO space Enabling different in x86 and ARM64 Bharat Kumar Gogada
2016-07-15  8:33 ` Arnd Bergmann
2016-07-16  3:22   ` Bharat Kumar Gogada
2016-07-15 21:47 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2016-07-16  3:25   ` Bharat Kumar Gogada [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=8520D5D51A55D047800579B094147198258B98C5@XAP-PVEXMBX01.xlnx.xilinx.com \
    --to=bharat.kumar.gogada@xilinx.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).