From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.7 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,INCLUDES_CR_TRAILER,INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE0FAC4338F for ; Wed, 28 Jul 2021 09:48:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8948160F9C for ; Wed, 28 Jul 2021 09:48:49 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 mail.kernel.org 8948160F9C Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=kernel.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:MIME-Version:References:In-Reply-To: Subject:Cc:To:From:Message-ID:Date:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=W2dky3Z7iRqctKhyRYgVD/SqFxXN74ll0Qfjhwg97kk=; b=hyrvZ9XEIyOf6i pPM1EegOE7kaztZa5MYqzDYtfvBHvBeOJPSWa0RoyzlV6QwRIiGkfAw8jFRAHTpMHANaAAHgn6V/p qlpqYf8+2xkwk0Ohp9qhD8YjMWNoBaaWcQ/Hk9J+U8ENdHIHNEbilWtGFcHjn7p4rYOQxrMw1GFrF HeHQdk2i5o4jIczLRaScyscRet0AW1595u/QExAJq38b27H87epicyIQThw6aJFSYcdq8+PRgz9oJ ggAin6nnh3VdBR1PfQw16P+E8XkHYdl44qaEfJXpva3jP6eEA6ZCglg/PvgNDnWhyPE2xOqvAVT// lJLd6siLELVzrKTMVZFg==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1m8g8g-000Eu5-78; Wed, 28 Jul 2021 09:46:10 +0000 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1m8g8Y-000ErQ-CF for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Wed, 28 Jul 2021 09:46:04 +0000 Received: from disco-boy.misterjones.org (disco-boy.misterjones.org [51.254.78.96]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 04C9D600D4; Wed, 28 Jul 2021 09:46:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from sofa.misterjones.org ([185.219.108.64] helo=why.misterjones.org) by disco-boy.misterjones.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1m8g8V-001V1V-Sj; Wed, 28 Jul 2021 10:46:00 +0100 Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2021 10:45:59 +0100 Message-ID: <874kceeppk.wl-maz@kernel.org> From: Marc Zyngier To: Will Deacon Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, qperret@google.com, dbrazdil@google.com, Srivatsa Vaddagiri , Shanker R Donthineni , James Morse , Suzuki K Poulose , Alexandru Elisei , kernel-team@android.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/16] KVM: arm64: Don't issue CMOs when the physical address is invalid In-Reply-To: <20210727181044.GB19173@willie-the-truck> References: <20210715163159.1480168-1-maz@kernel.org> <20210715163159.1480168-3-maz@kernel.org> <20210727181044.GB19173@willie-the-truck> User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.15.9 (Almost Unreal) SEMI-EPG/1.14.7 (Harue) FLIM-LB/1.14.9 (=?UTF-8?B?R29qxY0=?=) APEL-LB/10.8 EasyPG/1.0.0 Emacs/27.1 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) MULE/6.0 (HANACHIRUSATO) MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI-EPG 1.14.7 - "Harue") X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 185.219.108.64 X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: will@kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, qperret@google.com, dbrazdil@google.com, vatsa@codeaurora.org, sdonthineni@nvidia.com, james.morse@arm.com, suzuki.poulose@arm.com, alexandru.elisei@arm.com, kernel-team@android.com X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: maz@kernel.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on disco-boy.misterjones.org); SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20210728_024602_487671_F8510D51 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 25.16 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Tue, 27 Jul 2021 19:10:45 +0100, Will Deacon wrote: > > On Thu, Jul 15, 2021 at 05:31:45PM +0100, Marc Zyngier wrote: > > Make sure we don't issue CMOs when mapping something that > > is not a memory address in the S2 page tables. > > > > Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier > > --- > > arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/pgtable.c | 16 ++++++++++------ > > 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/pgtable.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/pgtable.c > > index 05321f4165e3..a5874ebd0354 100644 > > --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/pgtable.c > > +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/pgtable.c > > @@ -619,12 +619,16 @@ static int stage2_map_walker_try_leaf(u64 addr, u64 end, u32 level, > > } > > > > /* Perform CMOs before installation of the guest stage-2 PTE */ > > - if (mm_ops->dcache_clean_inval_poc && stage2_pte_cacheable(pgt, new)) > > - mm_ops->dcache_clean_inval_poc(kvm_pte_follow(new, mm_ops), > > - granule); > > - > > - if (mm_ops->icache_inval_pou && stage2_pte_executable(new)) > > - mm_ops->icache_inval_pou(kvm_pte_follow(new, mm_ops), granule); > > + if (kvm_phys_is_valid(phys)) { > > + if (mm_ops->dcache_clean_inval_poc && > > + stage2_pte_cacheable(pgt, new)) > > + mm_ops->dcache_clean_inval_poc(kvm_pte_follow(new, > > + mm_ops), > > + granule); > > + if (mm_ops->icache_inval_pou && stage2_pte_executable(new)) > > + mm_ops->icache_inval_pou(kvm_pte_follow(new, mm_ops), > > + granule); > > + } > > Given that this check corresponds to checking the validity of 'new', I > wonder whether we'd be better off pushing the validity checks down into > stage2_pte_{cacheable,executable}()? > > I.e. have stage2_pte_cacheable() return false if !kvm_pte_valid() That would work just as well. I'll update the patch. Thanks, M. -- Without deviation from the norm, progress is not possible. _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel