Re: [PATCH v17 06/23] powerpc: mm: Add p?d_leaf() definitions

From: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
To: Steven Price <steven.price@arm.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	linux-mm@kvack.org
Cc: "Mark Rutland" <Mark.Rutland@arm.com>,
	"Peter Zijlstra" <peterz@infradead.org>,
	"Benjamin Herrenschmidt" <benh@kernel.crashing.org>,
	"Dave Hansen" <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
	"Paul Mackerras" <paulus@samba.org>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>, "Will Deacon" <will@kernel.org>,
	"Liang, Kan" <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>,
	x86@kernel.org, "Steven Price" <steven.price@arm.com>,
	"Ingo Molnar" <mingo@redhat.com>,
	"Catalin Marinas" <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	"Arnd Bergmann" <arnd@arndb.de>,
	kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org, "Jérôme Glisse" <jglisse@redhat.com>,
	"Borislav Petkov" <bp@alien8.de>,
	"Andy Lutomirski" <luto@kernel.org>,
	"Thomas Gleixner" <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	"Ard Biesheuvel" <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "James Morse" <james.morse@arm.com>,
	linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v17 06/23] powerpc: mm: Add p?d_leaf() definitions
Date: Thu, 19 Dec 2019 22:49:16 +1100
Message-ID: <877e2smt6r.fsf@mpe.ellerman.id.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191218162402.45610-7-steven.price@arm.com>

Steven Price <steven.price@arm.com> writes:
> walk_page_range() is going to be allowed to walk page tables other than
> those of user space. For this it needs to know when it has reached a
> 'leaf' entry in the page tables. This information is provided by the
> p?d_leaf() functions/macros.
>
> For powerpc p?d_is_leaf() functions already exist. Export them using the
> new p?d_leaf() name.
>
> CC: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
> CC: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
> CC: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
> CC: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
> CC: kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Steven Price <steven.price@arm.com>
> ---
>  arch/powerpc/include/asm/book3s/64/pgtable.h | 3 +++
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)

We have fallback versions of our pmd_is_leaf() etc. in
arch/powerpc/include/asm/pgtable.h, eg:

#ifndef pmd_is_leaf
#define pmd_is_leaf pmd_is_leaf
static inline bool pmd_is_leaf(pmd_t pmd)
{
	return false;
}
#endif

Because we support several different MMUs and most of them don't need to
do anything.

So we could put the compatibility #defines to your names along with the
fallback versions in asm/pgtable.h, rather than in
asm/book3s/64/pgtable.h

But I see you also have fallbacks for your versions, so it probably
doesn't matter either way.

So I'm OK with this version, unless you think there's a compelling
reason to do the compatibility #defines in our asm/pgtable.h

Acked-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>

cheers

> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/book3s/64/pgtable.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/book3s/64/pgtable.h
> index b01624e5c467..201a69e6a355 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/book3s/64/pgtable.h
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/book3s/64/pgtable.h
> @@ -1355,18 +1355,21 @@ static inline bool is_pte_rw_upgrade(unsigned long old_val, unsigned long new_va
>   * Like pmd_huge() and pmd_large(), but works regardless of config options
>   */
>  #define pmd_is_leaf pmd_is_leaf
> +#define pmd_leaf pmd_is_leaf
>  static inline bool pmd_is_leaf(pmd_t pmd)
>  {
>  	return !!(pmd_raw(pmd) & cpu_to_be64(_PAGE_PTE));
>  }
>  
>  #define pud_is_leaf pud_is_leaf
> +#define pud_leaf pud_is_leaf
>  static inline bool pud_is_leaf(pud_t pud)
>  {
>  	return !!(pud_raw(pud) & cpu_to_be64(_PAGE_PTE));
>  }
>  
>  #define pgd_is_leaf pgd_is_leaf
> +#define pgd_leaf pgd_is_leaf
>  static inline bool pgd_is_leaf(pgd_t pgd)
>  {
>  	return !!(pgd_raw(pgd) & cpu_to_be64(_PAGE_PTE));
> -- 
> 2.20.1

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel