From: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
To: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@kernel.org>,
Aleksandar Markovic <aleksandar.qemu.devel@gmail.com>,
Anup Patel <anup@brainfault.org>,
Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@sifive.com>,
Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com>,
Albert Ou <aou@eecs.berkeley.edu>,
Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@linux.ibm.com>,
Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com>,
Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@linux.ibm.com>,
James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>,
Alexandru Elisei <alexandru.elisei@arm.com>,
Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@linux.dev>,
Atish Patra <atishp@atishpatra.org>,
David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, linux-mips@vger.kernel.org,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, kvm-riscv@lists.infradead.org,
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Maxim Levitsky <mlevitsk@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 12/12] KVM: remove KVM_REQ_UNHALT
Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2022 15:52:12 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87fsgjjwbn.wl-maz@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220921003201.1441511-13-seanjc@google.com>
On Wed, 21 Sep 2022 01:32:01 +0100,
Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com> wrote:
>
> From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
>
> KVM_REQ_UNHALT is now unnecessary because it is replaced by the return
> value of kvm_vcpu_block/kvm_vcpu_halt. Remove it.
>
> No functional change intended.
>
> Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
> Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
Acked-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
M.
--
Without deviation from the norm, progress is not possible.
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-09-22 15:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-09-21 0:31 [PATCH v4 00/12] KVM: x86: never write to memory from kvm_vcpu_check_block Sean Christopherson
2022-09-21 0:31 ` [PATCH v4 01/12] KVM: x86: make vendor code check for all nested events Sean Christopherson
2022-09-21 0:31 ` [PATCH v4 02/12] KVM: nVMX: Make an event request when pending an MTF nested VM-Exit Sean Christopherson
2022-09-21 0:31 ` [PATCH v4 03/12] KVM: x86: Rename and expose helper to detect if INIT/SIPI are allowed Sean Christopherson
2022-09-21 0:31 ` [PATCH v4 04/12] KVM: x86: Rename kvm_apic_has_events() to make it INIT/SIPI specific Sean Christopherson
2022-09-21 0:31 ` [PATCH v4 05/12] KVM: x86: lapic does not have to process INIT if it is blocked Sean Christopherson
2022-09-21 0:31 ` [PATCH v4 06/12] KVM: SVM: Make an event request if INIT or SIPI is pending when GIF is set Sean Christopherson
2022-09-21 0:31 ` [PATCH v4 07/12] KVM: nVMX: Make an event request if INIT or SIPI is pending on VM-Enter Sean Christopherson
2022-09-21 0:31 ` [PATCH v4 08/12] KVM: nVMX: Make event request on VMXOFF iff INIT/SIPI is pending Sean Christopherson
2022-09-21 0:31 ` [PATCH v4 09/12] KVM: x86: Don't snapshot pending INIT/SIPI prior to checking nested events Sean Christopherson
2022-09-21 0:31 ` [PATCH v4 10/12] KVM: x86: never write to memory from kvm_vcpu_check_block() Sean Christopherson
2023-12-07 1:03 ` Jim Mattson
2023-12-07 16:21 ` Sean Christopherson
2023-12-10 22:52 ` Jim Mattson
2023-12-12 15:28 ` Sean Christopherson
2023-12-13 22:25 ` Maxim Levitsky
2023-12-13 22:31 ` Jim Mattson
2023-12-13 22:44 ` Maxim Levitsky
2023-12-13 22:59 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-09-21 0:32 ` [PATCH v4 11/12] KVM: mips, x86: do not rely on KVM_REQ_UNHALT Sean Christopherson
2022-09-22 13:17 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2022-09-21 0:32 ` [PATCH v4 12/12] KVM: remove KVM_REQ_UNHALT Sean Christopherson
2022-09-22 14:52 ` Marc Zyngier [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87fsgjjwbn.wl-maz@kernel.org \
--to=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=aleksandar.qemu.devel@gmail.com \
--cc=alexandru.elisei@arm.com \
--cc=anup@brainfault.org \
--cc=aou@eecs.berkeley.edu \
--cc=atishp@atishpatra.org \
--cc=borntraeger@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=chenhuacai@kernel.org \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=frankja@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=imbrenda@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=james.morse@arm.com \
--cc=kvm-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mips@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=mlevitsk@redhat.com \
--cc=oliver.upton@linux.dev \
--cc=palmer@dabbelt.com \
--cc=paul.walmsley@sifive.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).