From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.5 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C44F4C4338F for ; Wed, 25 Aug 2021 14:26:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 93F6C60184 for ; Wed, 25 Aug 2021 14:26:57 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 mail.kernel.org 93F6C60184 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=tkos.co.il Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:MIME-Version:Message-ID:In-reply-to: Date:Subject:Cc:To:From:References:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=7SN1VL1tVtLfjHI4CgkOxvP5XThg/0lGqe1XeD6xSDQ=; b=xor+D0t1y3gRuq q42Op2YFbqTx1ZIBiL1NDb7j8b8V+o9oz+NIUPCvvtWl4uqo0PeSkvatNZEvEu03ld4IdHJeRANx1 sfp6MstoF83MsddcAkeKTwfnuFsIeMg6OO6okirpm1Ug5WY2GRn8AxB+UyNnaSH1oRfHrlPBUyfrC z97QnRO5Zprgb859fJnWktWR6yw+jn9LP7GjNLpFDrUaW6s/s2sxY/g63XLb3fYeWqusToZADp6ZH roqoWUOvHpPwxO0C3lo29Lg4KTPha4L5HWmL9HhbOekK8slJDOhXdU/EhGEC6jOwrJlguklAbBM4N b60QnMyW3bbFKrllZUAg==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1mItoh-007Fx8-Ru; Wed, 25 Aug 2021 14:23:47 +0000 Received: from guitar.tcltek.co.il ([192.115.133.116] helo=mx.tkos.co.il) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1mItob-007Fvh-KT; Wed, 25 Aug 2021 14:23:45 +0000 Received: from tarshish (unknown [10.0.8.2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx.tkos.co.il (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CE408440E88; Wed, 25 Aug 2021 17:23:29 +0300 (IDT) References: <87o89lahqp.fsf@tarshish> User-agent: mu4e 1.6.3; emacs 27.1 From: Baruch Siach To: Rob Herring Cc: Andy Gross , Bjorn Andersson , Selvam Sathappan Periakaruppan , Kathiravan T , Bjorn Helgaas , Kishon Vijay Abraham I , Vinod Koul , Thierry Reding , Jonathan Hunter , Jingoo Han , Gustavo Pimentel , Robert Marko , devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-phy@lists.infradead.org, PCI , linux-arm-msm , linux-arm-kernel , linux-tegra Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/6] PCI: qcom: add support for IPQ60xx PCIe controller Date: Wed, 25 Aug 2021 17:09:49 +0300 In-reply-to: Message-ID: <87lf4pa9i0.fsf@tarshish> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20210825_072341_985423_5664C3C5 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 15.45 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org Hi Rob, On Wed, Aug 25 2021, Rob Herring wrote: > On Wed, Aug 25, 2021 at 6:25 AM Baruch Siach wrote: >> On Fri, Aug 06 2021, Rob Herring wrote: >> > On Wed, May 5, 2021 at 3:18 AM Baruch Siach wrote: >> >> + writel(PCI_EXP_DEVCTL2_COMP_TMOUT_DIS, pci->dbi_base + offset + >> >> + PCI_EXP_DEVCTL2); >> >> + >> >> + writel(PCIE_CAP_CURR_DEEMPHASIS | SPEED_GEN3, >> >> + pci->dbi_base + offset + PCI_EXP_DEVCTL2); >> > >> > Doesn't this overwrite the prior register write? >> >> It does. There are two mistakes here. The writel() above should set >> PCIE20_DEVICE_CONTROL2_STATUS2 (offset 0x98). > > No. Did you check what 'offset' is? PCIE20_DEVICE_CONTROL2_STATUS2 is > PCI_EXP_DEVCTL2 plus the status reg. What's wrong is it should be a > 16-bit write. Thanks for enlightening me. 'offset' is 0x70 here. So PCI_EXP_DEVCTL2 is at 0x98, and PCI_EXP_LNKCTL2 is at 0xa0. Only the second writel() is wrong. But since generic code handles speed, I can drop it entirely. I see that dw_pcie_link_set_max_speed() uses dw_pcie_writel_dbi() to write to PCI_EXP_LNKCTL2. Is that 16-bit write? Why are pci_regs.h register offsets in decimal? >> This writel() should set >> PCIE20_LNK_CONTROL2_LINK_STATUS2 (offset 0xa0). So both are wrong. Thanks, baruch -- ~. .~ Tk Open Systems =}------------------------------------------------ooO--U--Ooo------------{= - baruch@tkos.co.il - tel: +972.52.368.4656, http://www.tkos.co.il - _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel