Re: [PATCH 2/2] usb: gadget: u_serial: improve performance for large data

From: Felipe Balbi <balbi@kernel.org>
To: "Macpaul Lin" <macpaul.lin@mediatek.com>,
	"Chunfeng Yun" <chunfeng.yun@mediatek.com>,
	"Greg Kroah-Hartman" <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	"Matthias Brugger" <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>,
	"Michał Mirosław" <mirq-linux@rere.qmqm.pl>,
	"Sergey Organov" <sorganov@gmail.com>,
	"Fabrice Gasnier" <fabrice.gasnier@st.com>,
	linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Macpaul Lin <macpaul.lin@gmail.com>,
	Macpaul Lin <macpaul.lin@mediatek.com>,
	Mediatek WSD Upstream <wsd_upstream@mediatek.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] usb: gadget: u_serial: improve performance for large data
Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2020 09:48:45 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87tuz1vu0i.fsf@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1592310884-4307-2-git-send-email-macpaul.lin@mediatek.com>

[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1911 bytes --]

Hi,

Macpaul Lin <macpaul.lin@mediatek.com> writes:

> If the hardware (like DMA engine) could support large usb request exceeds
> maximum packet size, use larger buffer when performing Rx/Tx could reduce
> request numbers and improve performance.
>
> Signed-off-by: Macpaul Lin <macpaul.lin@mediatek.com>
> ---
>  drivers/usb/gadget/function/u_serial.c |    9 +++++++--
>  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/usb/gadget/function/u_serial.c b/drivers/usb/gadget/function/u_serial.c
> index 3cfc6e2..cdcc070 100644
> --- a/drivers/usb/gadget/function/u_serial.c
> +++ b/drivers/usb/gadget/function/u_serial.c
> @@ -80,6 +80,8 @@
>  #define QUEUE_SIZE		16
>  #define WRITE_BUF_SIZE		8192		/* TX only */
>  #define GS_CONSOLE_BUF_SIZE	8192
> +/* for hardware can do more than max packet */
> +#define REQ_BUF_SIZE		4096
>  
>  /* console info */
>  struct gs_console {
> @@ -247,7 +249,8 @@ static int gs_start_tx(struct gs_port *port)
>  			break;
>  
>  		req = list_entry(pool->next, struct usb_request, list);
> -		len = gs_send_packet(port, req->buf, in->maxpacket);
> +		len = gs_send_packet(port, req->buf, in->can_exceed_maxp ?
> +				REQ_BUF_SIZE : in->maxpacket);

just do this unconditionally.

>  		if (len == 0) {
>  			wake_up_interruptible(&port->drain_wait);
>  			break;
> @@ -514,7 +517,9 @@ static int gs_alloc_requests(struct usb_ep *ep, struct list_head *head,
>  	 * be as speedy as we might otherwise be.
>  	 */
>  	for (i = 0; i < n; i++) {
> -		req = gs_alloc_req(ep, ep->maxpacket, GFP_ATOMIC);
> +		req = gs_alloc_req(ep, ep->can_exceed_maxp ?
> +					REQ_BUF_SIZE : ep->maxpacket,
> +					GFP_ATOMIC);

allocating 4kiB in atomic isn't very good. A better idea would be to
preallocate a list of requests and recycle them, rather than allocating
every time you need to do a transfer

-- 
balbi

[-- Attachment #1.2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 832 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 176 bytes --]

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel