From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 59EE9C433DB for ; Sat, 20 Mar 2021 17:16:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from desiato.infradead.org (desiato.infradead.org [90.155.92.199]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D848D61927 for ; Sat, 20 Mar 2021 17:16:37 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org D848D61927 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=kernel.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=desiato.20200630; h=Sender:Content-Transfer-Encoding :Content-Type:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post:List-Archive: List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:MIME-Version:References:In-Reply-To:Subject:Cc:To: From:Message-ID:Date:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=zA8lDgHDQqxiugw5EWuKAji66h/tgnlx3r/boyQbpJY=; b=TaSAvbaYCsJ7+AF75AFaXdssg tN0jEY7qGqyUDs0qZlLn6dyor6HycSaw8KJfQJq0Cl30zk6Y5Mixem4jBFhzA3OtaSBO5QTbq4RTE NHGXWi5K9N61evnpcfivYKXwW6lU9vh4O+wjKWowwVOj+TVGa2uJnSoRvC7mwBJqwNoe5IZjCtLyN ZFb5vB3jC7s6iC57OXuGOy1jYuTpat9TWRHosHjuCSY3C0H9gKzDaN8ilpk1eV1G1JM/jHRXI3j6/ i56KqsoGRm7etvoqmL0wrBu4eHY83JgaFP0Jhz36e0o99XJpN2mNO2seZfEZX1YHpsX4Xk4WSFp7+ YKAszsc3w==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=desiato.infradead.org) by desiato.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1lNfBd-00947M-Em; Sat, 20 Mar 2021 17:14:53 +0000 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]) by desiato.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.94 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1lNfBY-00946p-G7 for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Sat, 20 Mar 2021 17:14:50 +0000 Received: from disco-boy.misterjones.org (disco-boy.misterjones.org [51.254.78.96]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7151361927; Sat, 20 Mar 2021 17:14:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from 78.163-31-62.static.virginmediabusiness.co.uk ([62.31.163.78] helo=wait-a-minute.misterjones.org) by disco-boy.misterjones.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94) (envelope-from ) id 1lNfBQ-002o45-CP; Sat, 20 Mar 2021 17:14:40 +0000 Date: Sat, 20 Mar 2021 17:14:34 +0000 Message-ID: <87y2ehg32d.wl-maz@kernel.org> From: Marc Zyngier To: Arnd Bergmann Cc: Bjorn Helgaas , Boqun Feng , Bjorn Helgaas , Linux ARM , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Linux on Hyper-V List , linux-pci , Catalin Marinas , Will Deacon , "K. Y. Srinivasan" , Haiyang Zhang , Stephen Hemminger , Wei Liu , Lorenzo Pieralisi , Rob Herring , Clint Sbisa , Ard Biesheuvel , Sunil Muthuswamy Subject: Re: [RFC 1/2] arm64: PCI: Allow use arch-specific pci sysdata In-Reply-To: References: <20210319161956.2838291-2-boqun.feng@gmail.com> <20210319211246.GA250618@bjorn-Precision-5520> <87tup6gf3m.wl-maz@kernel.org> <87sg4qgdrd.wl-maz@kernel.org> User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.15.9 (Almost Unreal) SEMI-EPG/1.14.7 (Harue) FLIM-LB/1.14.9 (=?UTF-8?B?R29qxY0=?=) APEL-LB/10.8 EasyPG/1.0.0 Emacs/27.1 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) MULE/6.0 (HANACHIRUSATO) MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI-EPG 1.14.7 - "Harue") X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 62.31.163.78 X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: arnd@arndb.de, helgaas@kernel.org, boqun.feng@gmail.com, bhelgaas@google.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-hyperv@vger.kernel.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, catalin.marinas@arm.com, will@kernel.org, kys@microsoft.com, haiyangz@microsoft.com, sthemmin@microsoft.com, wei.liu@kernel.org, lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com, robh@kernel.org, csbisa@amazon.com, ardb@kernel.org, sunilmut@microsoft.com X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: maz@kernel.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on disco-boy.misterjones.org); SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20210320_171448_907371_F6DBF225 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 26.07 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Sat, 20 Mar 2021 14:24:06 +0000, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > On Sat, Mar 20, 2021 at 2:23 PM Marc Zyngier wrote: > > > > On Sat, 20 Mar 2021 13:03:13 +0000, > > Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > > > > > On Sat, Mar 20, 2021 at 1:54 PM Marc Zyngier wrote: > > > > On Fri, 19 Mar 2021 21:12:46 +0000, > > > > > > > > Having an optional callback to host bridges to obtain the MSI domain > > > > may be possible in some cases though (there might be a chicken/egg > > > > problem for some drivers though...). > > > > > > I would expect that the host bridge driver can find the MSI domain > > > at probe time and just add a pointer into the pci_host_bridge > > > structure. > > > > In most cases, it doesn't implement it itself, and I'd be reluctant to > > duplicate information that can already be retrieved from somewhere > > else in a generic way (i.e. no PCI specific). > > At the moment, the information is retried through a maze of different > functions, and already duplicated in both the pci_host_bridge and the > pci_bus structures. If we can change everything to use > CONFIG_GENERIC_MSI_IRQ_DOMAIN, then most of that code > can probably just go away, leaving only the part in the phb. Fine by me, as long as you don't assume that there is a single MSI domain per PHB (both OF and IORT mandate that you can segment the RID space to hit multiple controllers). M. -- Without deviation from the norm, progress is not possible. _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel