From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.0 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A0508C433DF for ; Fri, 31 Jul 2020 09:18:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from merlin.infradead.org (merlin.infradead.org [205.233.59.134]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6F20B22B40 for ; Fri, 31 Jul 2020 09:18:06 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lists.infradead.org header.i=@lists.infradead.org header.b="R4Eq9YAv"; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=mg.codeaurora.org header.i=@mg.codeaurora.org header.b="oZiLSpTA" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 6F20B22B40 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=codeaurora.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=merlin.20170209; h=Sender:Content-Type: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Cc:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post:List-Archive: List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:Message-ID:References:In-Reply-To:Subject:To:From: Date:MIME-Version:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=/67iApuU7VHgy/+5YzohTXITk2zh69BopAFIAqd1JXA=; b=R4Eq9YAvhQ8DxDJG8lWE1fEAq m4/M5Z8Lohlh2YpBeZ67m5oKYWZHMz8zVJWXgneAtas7Xeub8JxzxfV3WRKoB3fgOtV1SWT1e4RyT gPtuysQz7aVTGS5Bv79RsgX81YHeFXmOlq8LfmFB6HMac3PifsGpqHahgsGFCiAM4xmLe3HWvwatB 4upeJcC5dAclKkoIQiebqQ60rRzB6zZkC/sVFO0wYLQimjm/jA7xIVPvy+HUqoqE0y3uMKaNfTSGS uc+IqAEZ58e0VL0HOhG1zSvY5ZBhEmJXitAqPQIabaxtuTshRW7GtvnvG2TPiMy0Vh+riTRK4msph WbAncGf2w==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=merlin.infradead.org) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1k1R9E-0006q7-8X; Fri, 31 Jul 2020 09:16:16 +0000 Received: from mail29.static.mailgun.info ([104.130.122.29]) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1k1PzZ-0007v4-Mj for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Fri, 31 Jul 2020 08:02:17 +0000 DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha256; v=1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mg.codeaurora.org; q=dns/txt; s=smtp; t=1596182536; h=Message-ID: References: In-Reply-To: Subject: Cc: To: From: Date: Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-Type: MIME-Version: Sender; bh=MKSQY5RVrXIwpdJw6RKFSgNCGEE7ar+hIe83C8B0HxA=; b=oZiLSpTANueMs8bY+viqh1YjRb0yXPwC/CFw4XChZjFkR63lEaYvctWfytXiL3tFt+UYbXHI VwI1WtxSZKQV5+r+8HESUv/v03ftWGvKf6IKuukIv2QlCTxMh3EBD3KEJUpyh0RP/96yS+56 xxivWYB60Q30ORe/7f8vQxmzTOA= X-Mailgun-Sending-Ip: 104.130.122.29 X-Mailgun-Sid: WyJiYzAxZiIsICJsaW51eC1hcm0ta2VybmVsQGxpc3RzLmluZnJhZGVhZC5vcmciLCAiYmU5ZTRhIl0= Received: from smtp.codeaurora.org (ec2-35-166-182-171.us-west-2.compute.amazonaws.com [35.166.182.171]) by smtp-out-n03.prod.us-east-1.postgun.com with SMTP id 5f23cf9ff89b692ba2ca826e (version=TLS1.2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256); Fri, 31 Jul 2020 08:00:31 GMT Received: by smtp.codeaurora.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 0295FC433B1; Fri, 31 Jul 2020 08:00:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.codeaurora.org (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: cang) by smtp.codeaurora.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 881C9C4339C; Fri, 31 Jul 2020 08:00:28 +0000 (UTC) MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2020 16:00:28 +0800 From: Can Guo To: Bart Van Assche Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] scsi: ufs: Cleanup completed request without interrupt notification In-Reply-To: <97f1dfb0-41b6-0249-3e82-cae480b0efb6@acm.org> References: <20200724140246.19434-1-stanley.chu@mediatek.com> <1596159018.17247.53.camel@mtkswgap22> <97f1dfb0-41b6-0249-3e82-cae480b0efb6@acm.org> Message-ID: <8b0a158a7c3ee2165e09290996521ffc@codeaurora.org> X-Sender: cang@codeaurora.org User-Agent: Roundcube Webmail/1.3.9 X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20200731_040217_117552_09436B92 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 21.00 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, martin.petersen@oracle.com, andy.teng@mediatek.com, jejb@linux.ibm.com, chun-hung.wu@mediatek.com, kuohong.wang@mediatek.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, asutoshd@codeaurora.org, Avri Altman , linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org, peter.wang@mediatek.com, alim.akhtar@samsung.com, matthias.bgg@gmail.com, Stanley Chu , chaotian.jing@mediatek.com, cc.chou@mediatek.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, beanhuo@micron.com Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org Hi Bart, On 2020-07-31 12:06, Bart Van Assche wrote: > On 2020-07-30 18:30, Stanley Chu wrote: >> On Mon, 2020-07-27 at 11:18 +0000, Avri Altman wrote: >>> Looks good to me. >>> But better wait and see if Bart have any further reservations. >> >> Would you have any further suggestions? > > Today is the first time that I took a look at ufshcd_abort(). The > approach of that function looks wrong to me. This is how I think that a > SCSI LLD abort handler should work: > (1) Serialize against the completion path > (__ufshcd_transfer_req_compl()) such that it cannot happen that the > abort handler and the regular completion path both call > cmd->scsi_done(cmd) at the same time. I'm not sure whether an existing > synchronization object can be used for this purpose or whether a new > synchronization object has to be introduced to serialize scsi_done() > calls from __ufshcd_transfer_req_compl() and ufshcd_abort(). > (2) While holding that synchronization object, check whether the SCSI > command is still outstanding. If so, submit a SCSI abort TMR to the > device. > (3) If the command has been aborted, call scsi_done() and return > SUCCESS. If aborting failed and the command is still in progress, > return > FAILED. > > An example is available in srp_abort() in > drivers/infiniband/ulp/srp/ib_srp.c. > > Bart. AFAIK, sychronization of scsi_done is not a problem here, because scsi layer use the atomic state, namely SCMD_STATE_COMPLETE, of a scsi cmd to prevent the concurrency of abort and real completion of it. Check func scsi_times_out(), hope it helps. enum blk_eh_timer_return scsi_times_out(struct request *req) { ... if (rtn == BLK_EH_DONE) { /* * Set the command to complete first in order to prevent a real * completion from releasing the command while error handling * is using it. If the command was already completed, then the * lower level driver beat the timeout handler, and it is safe * to return without escalating error recovery. * * If timeout handling lost the race to a real completion, the * block layer may ignore that due to a fake timeout injection, * so return RESET_TIMER to allow error handling another shot * at this command. */ if (test_and_set_bit(SCMD_STATE_COMPLETE, &scmd->state)) return BLK_EH_RESET_TIMER; if (scsi_abort_command(scmd) != SUCCESS) { set_host_byte(scmd, DID_TIME_OUT); scsi_eh_scmd_add(scmd); } } } Thanks, Can Guo. _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel