From: Xie XiuQi <xiexiuqi@huawei.com>
To: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: Rafael Wysocki <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>, Fan Wu <wufan@codeaurora.org>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>,
Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@arm.com>,
Dongjiu Geng <gengdongjiu@huawei.com>,
Wang Xiongfeng <wangxiongfeng2@huawei.com>,
linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org,
Naoya Horiguchi <n-horiguchi@ah.jp.nec.com>,
kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 22/25] ACPI / APEI: Kick the memory_failure() queue for synchronous errors
Date: Wed, 5 Dec 2018 10:02:53 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <9d153a07-aa7a-6e0c-3bd3-994a66f9639a@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20181203180613.228133-23-james.morse@arm.com>
Hi James & Boris,
On 2018/12/4 2:06, James Morse wrote:
> memory_failure() offlines or repairs pages of memory that have been
> discovered to be corrupt. These may be detected by an external
> component, (e.g. the memory controller), and notified via an IRQ.
> In this case the work is queued as not all of memory_failure()s work
> can happen in IRQ context.
>
> If the error was detected as a result of user-space accessing a
> corrupt memory location the CPU may take an abort instead. On arm64
> this is a 'synchronous external abort', and on a firmware first
> system it is replayed using NOTIFY_SEA.
>
> This notification has NMI like properties, (it can interrupt
> IRQ-masked code), so the memory_failure() work is queued. If we
> return to user-space before the queued memory_failure() work is
> processed, we will take the fault again. This loop may cause platform
> firmware to exceed some threshold and reboot when Linux could have
> recovered from this error.
>
> If a ghes notification type indicates that it may be triggered again
> when we return to user-space, use the task-work and notify-resume
> hooks to kick the relevant memory_failure() queue before returning
> to user-space.
>
> Signed-off-by: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>
>
> ---
> current->mm == &init_mm ? I couldn't find a helper for this.
> The intent is not to set TIF flags on kernel threads. What happens
> if a kernel-thread takes on of these? Its just one of the many
> not-handled-very-well cases we have already, as memory_failure()
> puts it: "try to be lucky".
>
> I assume that if NOTIFY_NMI is coming from SMM it must suffer from
> this problem too.
> ---
> drivers/acpi/apei/ghes.c | 65 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
> 1 file changed, 60 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/apei/ghes.c b/drivers/acpi/apei/ghes.c
> index 6cbf9471b2a2..3e7da9243153 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/apei/ghes.c
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/apei/ghes.c
> @@ -47,6 +47,7 @@
> #include <linux/sched/clock.h>
> #include <linux/uuid.h>
> #include <linux/ras.h>
> +#include <linux/task_work.h>
>
> #include <acpi/actbl1.h>
> #include <acpi/ghes.h>
> @@ -136,6 +137,26 @@ static atomic_t ghes_estatus_cache_alloced;
>
> static int ghes_panic_timeout __read_mostly = 30;
>
> +static bool ghes_is_synchronous(struct ghes *ghes)
> +{
> + switch (ghes->generic->notify.type) {
> + case ACPI_HEST_NOTIFY_NMI: /* fall through */
> + case ACPI_HEST_NOTIFY_SEA:
> + /*
> + * These notifications could be repeated if the interrupted
> + * instruction is run again. e.g. a read of bad-memory causing
> + * a trap to platform firmware.
> + */
> + return true;
> + default:
> + /*
> + * Other notifications are asynchronous, and not related to the
> + * interrupted instruction. e.g. an IRQ.
> + */
> + return false;
> + }
> +}
> +
> static void __iomem *ghes_map(u64 pfn, int fixmap_idx)
> {
> phys_addr_t paddr;
> @@ -379,14 +400,33 @@ static void ghes_clear_estatus(struct acpi_hest_generic_status *estatus,
> fixmap_idx);
> }
>
> -static void ghes_handle_memory_failure(struct acpi_hest_generic_data *gdata, int sev)
> +struct ghes_memory_failure_work {
> + int cpu;
> + struct callback_head work;
> +};
> +
> +static void ghes_kick_memory_failure(struct callback_head *head)
> +{
> + struct ghes_memory_failure_work *callback;
> +
> + callback = container_of(head, struct ghes_memory_failure_work, work);
> + memory_failure_queue_kick(callback->cpu);
> + kfree(callback);
> +}
> +
> +static void ghes_handle_memory_failure(struct ghes *ghes,
> + struct acpi_hest_generic_data *gdata,
> + int sev)
> {
> -#ifdef CONFIG_ACPI_APEI_MEMORY_FAILURE
> unsigned long pfn;
> - int flags = -1;
> + int flags = -1, ret;
> + struct ghes_memory_failure_work *callback;
> int sec_sev = ghes_severity(gdata->error_severity);
> struct cper_sec_mem_err *mem_err = acpi_hest_get_payload(gdata);
>
> + if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ACPI_APEI_MEMORY_FAILURE))
> + return;
> +
> if (!(mem_err->validation_bits & CPER_MEM_VALID_PA))
> return;
>
> @@ -407,7 +447,22 @@ static void ghes_handle_memory_failure(struct acpi_hest_generic_data *gdata, int
>
> if (flags != -1)
> memory_failure_queue(pfn, flags);
We may need to take MF_ACTION_REQUIRED flags for memory_failure() in SEA condition.
And there is no return value check for memory_failure() in memory_failure_work_func(),
I'm not sure whether we need to check the return value.
static void memory_failure_work_func(struct work_struct *work)
{
struct memory_failure_cpu *mf_cpu;
struct memory_failure_entry entry = { 0, };
unsigned long proc_flags;
int gotten;
mf_cpu = container_of(work, struct memory_failure_cpu, work);
for (;;) {
spin_lock_irqsave(&mf_cpu->lock, proc_flags);
gotten = kfifo_get(&mf_cpu->fifo, &entry);
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&mf_cpu->lock, proc_flags);
if (!gotten)
break;
if (entry.flags & MF_SOFT_OFFLINE)
soft_offline_page(pfn_to_page(entry.pfn), entry.flags);
else
memory_failure(entry.pfn, entry.flags);
}
}
If the recovery fails here, we need to take other actions, such as force to send a SIGBUS signal.
> -#endif
> +
> + /*
> + * If the notification indicates that it was the interrupted
> + * instruction that caused the error, try to kick the
> + * memory_failure() queue before returning to user-space.
> + */
> + if (ghes_is_synchronous(ghes) && current->mm != &init_mm) {
> + callback = kzalloc(sizeof(*callback), GFP_ATOMIC);
> + if (!callback)
> + return;
> + callback->work.func = ghes_kick_memory_failure;
> + callback->cpu = smp_processor_id();
> + ret = task_work_add(current, &callback->work, true);
> + if (ret)
> + kfree(callback);
> + }
> }
>
> /*
> @@ -480,7 +535,7 @@ static void ghes_do_proc(struct ghes *ghes,
> ghes_edac_report_mem_error(sev, mem_err);
>
> arch_apei_report_mem_error(sev, mem_err);
> - ghes_handle_memory_failure(gdata, sev);
> + ghes_handle_memory_failure(ghes, gdata, sev);
> }
> else if (guid_equal(sec_type, &CPER_SEC_PCIE)) {
> ghes_handle_aer(gdata);
>
--
Thanks,
Xie XiuQi
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-12-05 2:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 72+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-12-03 18:05 [PATCH v7 00/25] APEI in_nmi() rework and SDEI wire-up James Morse
2018-12-03 18:05 ` [PATCH v7 01/25] ACPI / APEI: Don't wait to serialise with oops messages when panic()ing James Morse
2018-12-03 18:05 ` [PATCH v7 02/25] ACPI / APEI: Remove silent flag from ghes_read_estatus() James Morse
2018-12-04 11:36 ` Borislav Petkov
2018-12-03 18:05 ` [PATCH v7 03/25] ACPI / APEI: Switch estatus pool to use vmalloc memory James Morse
2018-12-04 13:01 ` Borislav Petkov
2018-12-03 18:05 ` [PATCH v7 04/25] ACPI / APEI: Make hest.c manage the estatus memory pool James Morse
2018-12-11 16:48 ` Borislav Petkov
2018-12-14 13:56 ` James Morse
2018-12-19 14:42 ` Borislav Petkov
2019-01-10 18:20 ` James Morse
2018-12-03 18:05 ` [PATCH v7 05/25] ACPI / APEI: Make estatus pool allocation a static size James Morse
2018-12-11 16:54 ` Borislav Petkov
2018-12-03 18:05 ` [PATCH v7 06/25] ACPI / APEI: Don't store CPER records physical address in struct ghes James Morse
2018-12-11 17:04 ` Borislav Petkov
2018-12-03 18:05 ` [PATCH v7 07/25] ACPI / APEI: Remove spurious GHES_TO_CLEAR check James Morse
2018-12-11 17:18 ` Borislav Petkov
2018-12-03 18:05 ` [PATCH v7 08/25] ACPI / APEI: Don't update struct ghes' flags in read/clear estatus James Morse
2018-12-03 18:05 ` [PATCH v7 09/25] ACPI / APEI: Generalise the estatus queue's notify code James Morse
2018-12-11 17:44 ` Borislav Petkov
2019-01-10 18:21 ` James Morse
2019-01-11 11:46 ` Borislav Petkov
2018-12-03 18:05 ` [PATCH v7 10/25] ACPI / APEI: Tell firmware the estatus queue consumed the records James Morse
2018-12-11 18:36 ` Borislav Petkov
2019-01-10 18:22 ` James Morse
2019-01-10 21:01 ` Tyler Baicar
2019-01-11 12:03 ` Borislav Petkov
2019-01-11 15:32 ` Tyler Baicar
2019-01-11 17:45 ` Borislav Petkov
2019-01-11 18:25 ` James Morse
2019-01-11 19:58 ` Borislav Petkov
2019-01-23 18:36 ` James Morse
2019-01-29 11:49 ` Borislav Petkov
2019-01-29 18:48 ` James Morse
2019-01-31 13:29 ` Borislav Petkov
2019-01-11 18:09 ` James Morse
2019-01-11 20:01 ` Borislav Petkov
2019-01-11 20:53 ` Tyler Baicar
2019-01-29 18:48 ` James Morse
2018-12-03 18:05 ` [PATCH v7 11/25] ACPI / APEI: Move NOTIFY_SEA between the estatus-queue and NOTIFY_NMI James Morse
2019-01-21 13:01 ` Borislav Petkov
2018-12-03 18:06 ` [PATCH v7 12/25] ACPI / APEI: Switch NOTIFY_SEA to use the estatus queue James Morse
2018-12-03 18:06 ` [PATCH v7 13/25] KVM: arm/arm64: Add kvm_ras.h to collect kvm specific RAS plumbing James Morse
2018-12-06 16:17 ` Catalin Marinas
2018-12-03 18:06 ` [PATCH v7 14/25] arm64: KVM/mm: Move SEA handling behind a single 'claim' interface James Morse
2018-12-06 16:17 ` Catalin Marinas
2018-12-03 18:06 ` [PATCH v7 15/25] ACPI / APEI: Move locking to the notification helper James Morse
2018-12-03 18:06 ` [PATCH v7 16/25] ACPI / APEI: Let the notification helper specify the fixmap slot James Morse
2018-12-03 18:06 ` [PATCH v7 17/25] ACPI / APEI: Pass ghes and estatus separately to avoid a later copy James Morse
2019-01-21 13:35 ` Borislav Petkov
2018-12-03 18:06 ` [PATCH v7 18/25] ACPI / APEI: Split ghes_read_estatus() to allow a peek at the CPER length James Morse
2019-01-21 13:53 ` Borislav Petkov
2018-12-03 18:06 ` [PATCH v7 19/25] ACPI / APEI: Only use queued estatus entry during _in_nmi_notify_one() James Morse
2019-01-21 17:19 ` Borislav Petkov
2018-12-03 18:06 ` [PATCH v7 20/25] ACPI / APEI: Use separate fixmap pages for arm64 NMI-like notifications James Morse
2019-01-21 17:27 ` Borislav Petkov
2019-01-23 18:33 ` James Morse
2019-01-31 13:38 ` Borislav Petkov
2018-12-03 18:06 ` [PATCH v7 21/25] mm/memory-failure: Add memory_failure_queue_kick() James Morse
2018-12-03 18:06 ` [PATCH v7 22/25] ACPI / APEI: Kick the memory_failure() queue for synchronous errors James Morse
2018-12-05 2:02 ` Xie XiuQi [this message]
2018-12-10 19:15 ` James Morse
2019-01-22 10:51 ` Borislav Petkov
2019-01-23 18:37 ` James Morse
2019-01-21 17:58 ` Borislav Petkov
2019-01-23 18:40 ` James Morse
2019-01-31 14:04 ` Borislav Petkov
2018-12-03 18:06 ` [PATCH v7 23/25] arm64: acpi: Make apei_claim_sea() synchronise with APEI's irq work James Morse
2018-12-06 16:18 ` Catalin Marinas
2018-12-03 18:06 ` [PATCH v7 24/25] firmware: arm_sdei: Add ACPI GHES registration helper James Morse
2018-12-06 16:18 ` Catalin Marinas
2018-12-03 18:06 ` [PATCH v7 25/25] ACPI / APEI: Add support for the SDEI GHES Notification type James Morse
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=9d153a07-aa7a-6e0c-3bd3-994a66f9639a@huawei.com \
--to=xiexiuqi@huawei.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=christoffer.dall@arm.com \
--cc=gengdongjiu@huawei.com \
--cc=james.morse@arm.com \
--cc=kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu \
--cc=lenb@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=marc.zyngier@arm.com \
--cc=n-horiguchi@ah.jp.nec.com \
--cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
--cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
--cc=wangxiongfeng2@huawei.com \
--cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
--cc=wufan@codeaurora.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).