linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ravi Bangoria <ravi.bangoria@amd.com>
To: peterz@infradead.org
Cc: acme@kernel.org, alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com,
	jolsa@redhat.com, namhyung@kernel.org, songliubraving@fb.com,
	eranian@google.com, ak@linux.intel.com, mark.rutland@arm.com,
	frederic@kernel.org, maddy@linux.ibm.com, irogers@google.com,
	will@kernel.org, robh@kernel.org, mingo@redhat.com,
	catalin.marinas@arm.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
	linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	sandipan.das@amd.com, ananth.narayan@amd.com,
	kim.phillips@amd.com, santosh.shukla@amd.com,
	ravi.bangoria@amd.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf: Rewrite core context handling
Date: Tue, 6 Sep 2022 11:20:53 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <9d7a9f37-f037-00b8-afd3-72bb840a90df@amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220829113347.295-1-ravi.bangoria@amd.com>

> @@ -9752,10 +9889,13 @@ void perf_tp_event(u16 event_type, u64 count, void *record, int entry_size,
>  		struct trace_entry *entry = record;
>  
>  		rcu_read_lock();
> -		ctx = rcu_dereference(task->perf_event_ctxp[perf_sw_context]);
> +		ctx = rcu_dereference(task->perf_event_ctxp);
>  		if (!ctx)
>  			goto unlock;
>  
> +		// XXX iterate groups instead, we should be able to
> +		// find the subtree for the perf_tracepoint pmu and CPU.
> +
>  		list_for_each_entry_rcu(event, &ctx->event_list, event_entry) {
>  			if (event->cpu != smp_processor_id())
>  				continue;

This one was simple enough so I prepared a patch for this. Let
me know if you see any issues with below diff.

---
diff --git a/kernel/events/core.c b/kernel/events/core.c
index 820c56c66b26..e0232e0bb74e 100644
--- a/kernel/events/core.c
+++ b/kernel/events/core.c
@@ -9807,6 +9807,44 @@ static struct pmu perf_swevent = {
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_EVENT_TRACING
 
+static void tp_perf_event_destroy(struct perf_event *event)
+{
+	perf_trace_destroy(event);
+}
+
+static int perf_tp_event_init(struct perf_event *event)
+{
+	int err;
+
+	if (event->attr.type != PERF_TYPE_TRACEPOINT)
+		return -ENOENT;
+
+	/*
+	 * no branch sampling for tracepoint events
+	 */
+	if (has_branch_stack(event))
+		return -EOPNOTSUPP;
+
+	err = perf_trace_init(event);
+	if (err)
+		return err;
+
+	event->destroy = tp_perf_event_destroy;
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static struct pmu perf_tracepoint = {
+	.task_ctx_nr	= perf_sw_context,
+
+	.event_init	= perf_tp_event_init,
+	.add		= perf_trace_add,
+	.del		= perf_trace_del,
+	.start		= perf_swevent_start,
+	.stop		= perf_swevent_stop,
+	.read		= perf_swevent_read,
+};
+
 static int perf_tp_filter_match(struct perf_event *event,
 				struct perf_sample_data *data)
 {
@@ -9856,6 +9894,49 @@ void perf_trace_run_bpf_submit(void *raw_data, int size, int rctx,
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(perf_trace_run_bpf_submit);
 
+
+static void __perf_tp_event_target_task(u64 count, void *record,
+					struct pt_regs *regs,
+					struct perf_sample_data *data,
+					struct perf_event *event)
+{
+	struct trace_entry *entry = record;
+
+	if (event->attr.config != entry->type)
+		return;
+	/* Cannot deliver synchronous signal to other task. */
+	if (event->attr.sigtrap)
+		return;
+	if (perf_tp_event_match(event, data, regs))
+		perf_swevent_event(event, count, data, regs);
+}
+
+static void perf_tp_event_target_task(u64 count, void *record,
+				      struct pt_regs *regs,
+				      struct perf_sample_data *data,
+				      struct perf_event_context *ctx)
+{
+	struct perf_event *event, *sibling;
+
+	event = perf_event_groups_first(&ctx->pinned_groups, smp_processor_id(),
+					&perf_tracepoint, NULL);
+	for (; event; event = perf_event_groups_next(event, &perf_tracepoint)) {
+		__perf_tp_event_target_task(count, record, regs, data, event);
+		for_each_sibling_event(sibling, event) {
+			__perf_tp_event_target_task(count, record, regs, data, sibling);
+		}
+	}
+
+	event = perf_event_groups_first(&ctx->flexible_groups, smp_processor_id(),
+					&perf_tracepoint, NULL);
+	for (; event; event = perf_event_groups_next(event, &perf_tracepoint)) {
+		__perf_tp_event_target_task(count, record, regs, data, event);
+		for_each_sibling_event(sibling, event) {
+			__perf_tp_event_target_task(count, record, regs, data, sibling);
+		}
+	}
+}
+
 void perf_tp_event(u16 event_type, u64 count, void *record, int entry_size,
 		   struct pt_regs *regs, struct hlist_head *head, int rctx,
 		   struct task_struct *task)
@@ -9886,29 +9967,15 @@ void perf_tp_event(u16 event_type, u64 count, void *record, int entry_size,
 	 */
 	if (task && task != current) {
 		struct perf_event_context *ctx;
-		struct trace_entry *entry = record;
 
 		rcu_read_lock();
 		ctx = rcu_dereference(task->perf_event_ctxp);
 		if (!ctx)
 			goto unlock;
 
-		// XXX iterate groups instead, we should be able to
-		// find the subtree for the perf_tracepoint pmu and CPU.
-
-		list_for_each_entry_rcu(event, &ctx->event_list, event_entry) {
-			if (event->cpu != smp_processor_id())
-				continue;
-			if (event->attr.type != PERF_TYPE_TRACEPOINT)
-				continue;
-			if (event->attr.config != entry->type)
-				continue;
-			/* Cannot deliver synchronous signal to other task. */
-			if (event->attr.sigtrap)
-				continue;
-			if (perf_tp_event_match(event, &data, regs))
-				perf_swevent_event(event, count, &data, regs);
-		}
+		raw_spin_lock(&ctx->lock);
+		perf_tp_event_target_task(count, record, regs, &data, ctx);
+		raw_spin_unlock(&ctx->lock);
 unlock:
 		rcu_read_unlock();
 	}
@@ -9917,44 +9984,6 @@ void perf_tp_event(u16 event_type, u64 count, void *record, int entry_size,
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(perf_tp_event);
 
-static void tp_perf_event_destroy(struct perf_event *event)
-{
-	perf_trace_destroy(event);
-}
-
-static int perf_tp_event_init(struct perf_event *event)
-{
-	int err;
-
-	if (event->attr.type != PERF_TYPE_TRACEPOINT)
-		return -ENOENT;
-
-	/*
-	 * no branch sampling for tracepoint events
-	 */
-	if (has_branch_stack(event))
-		return -EOPNOTSUPP;
-
-	err = perf_trace_init(event);
-	if (err)
-		return err;
-
-	event->destroy = tp_perf_event_destroy;
-
-	return 0;
-}
-
-static struct pmu perf_tracepoint = {
-	.task_ctx_nr	= perf_sw_context,
-
-	.event_init	= perf_tp_event_init,
-	.add		= perf_trace_add,
-	.del		= perf_trace_del,
-	.start		= perf_swevent_start,
-	.stop		= perf_swevent_stop,
-	.read		= perf_swevent_read,
-};
-
 #if defined(CONFIG_KPROBE_EVENTS) || defined(CONFIG_UPROBE_EVENTS)
 /*
  * Flags in config, used by dynamic PMU kprobe and uprobe

---

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

  parent reply	other threads:[~2022-09-06  5:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <20220829113347.295-1-ravi.bangoria@amd.com>
2022-08-29 12:04 ` [PATCH] perf: Rewrite core context handling Peter Zijlstra
2022-08-29 14:40   ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-09-01 10:35     ` Ravi Bangoria
2022-09-01 11:29       ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-09-05  4:40         ` Ravi Bangoria
2022-09-06  5:50 ` Ravi Bangoria [this message]
2022-10-10 10:23   ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-10-10 11:01     ` Ravi Bangoria
2022-09-07 11:28 ` Ravi Bangoria
2022-10-10 10:14   ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-10-10 10:59     ` Ravi Bangoria

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=9d7a9f37-f037-00b8-afd3-72bb840a90df@amd.com \
    --to=ravi.bangoria@amd.com \
    --cc=acme@kernel.org \
    --cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=ananth.narayan@amd.com \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=eranian@google.com \
    --cc=frederic@kernel.org \
    --cc=irogers@google.com \
    --cc=jolsa@redhat.com \
    --cc=kim.phillips@amd.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=maddy@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=robh@kernel.org \
    --cc=sandipan.das@amd.com \
    --cc=santosh.shukla@amd.com \
    --cc=songliubraving@fb.com \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).