From: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
To: Joe Richey <joerichey94@gmail.com>,
trivial@kernel.org, Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Joe Richey <joerichey@google.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
x86@kernel.org, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@kernel.org>,
Zhangfei Gao <zhangfei.gao@linaro.org>,
Zhou Wang <wangzhou1@hisilicon.com>,
Andy Whitcroft <apw@canonical.com>,
Dwaipayan Ray <dwaipayanray1@gmail.com>,
Lukas Bulwahn <lukas.bulwahn@gmail.com>,
Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>,
"Chang S. Bae" <chang.seok.bae@intel.com>,
Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>, Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>,
Lei Cao <lei.cao@stratus.com>,
Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>,
Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>,
Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe@linaro.org>,
Zaibo Xu <xuzaibo@huawei.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
Hans Verkuil <hverkuil-cisco@xs4all.nl>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-media@vger.kernel.org,
linux-accelerators@lists.ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 7/7] checkpatch: suggest _BITULL() and _BITUL() for UAPI headers
Date: Fri, 21 May 2021 07:45:23 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <9d8659fc8bc0729dd255c20234fb1a4210847ce9.camel@perches.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210521085849.37676-8-joerichey94@gmail.com>
On Fri, 2021-05-21 at 01:58 -0700, Joe Richey wrote:
> From: Joe Richey <joerichey@google.com>
>
> Instead of just ignoring UAPI headers, reccomend the UAPI compatible
> macros if a user adds something that looks like (1 << n). Normal kernel
> code will continue to get BIT_ULL() and BIT() reccomended.
>
> This change also modifies the $realfile regex to match headers that have
> "include/uapi" anywhere in their path so paths like:
> tools/include/uapi/linux/kvm.h
> arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/hwcap2.h
> get recognized as UAPI headers.
[]
> diff --git a/scripts/checkpatch.pl b/scripts/checkpatch.pl
[]
> @@ -7020,15 +7020,17 @@ sub process {
> }
> }
>
>
> -# check for #defines like: 1 << <digit> that could be BIT(digit), it is not exported to uapi
> - if ($realfile !~ m@^include/uapi/@ &&
> - $line =~ /#\s*define\s+\w+\s+\(?\s*1\s*([ulUL]*)\s*\<\<\s*(?:\d+|$Ident)\s*\)?/) {
> - my $ull = "";
> - $ull = "_ULL" if (defined($1) && $1 =~ /ll/i);
> +# check for #defines like: 1 << <digit> that could be BIT(digit) or similar
> + if ($line =~ /#\s*define\s+\w+\s+\(?\s*1\s*([ulUL]*)\s*\<\<\s*(?:\d+|$Ident)\s*\)?/) {
> + my $ull = (defined($1) && $1 =~ /ll/i);
> + my $macroname = $ull ? "BIT_ULL" : "BIT";
> + if ($realfile =~ m@include/uapi/@) {
Likely better with \b
if ($realfile =~ m@\binclude/uapi/@) {
> + $macroname = $ull ? "_BITULL" : "_BITUL";
> + }
> if (CHK("BIT_MACRO",
> - "Prefer using the BIT$ull macro\n" . $herecurr) &&
> + "Prefer using the $macroname macro\n" . $herecurr) &&
> $fix) {
> - $fixed[$fixlinenr] =~ s/\(?\s*1\s*[ulUL]*\s*<<\s*(\d+|$Ident)\s*\)?/BIT${ull}($1)/;
> + $fixed[$fixlinenr] =~ s/\(?\s*1\s*[ulUL]*\s*<<\s*(\d+|$Ident)\s*\)?/${macroname}($1)/;
Doesn't need braces
$fixed[$fixlinenr] =~ s/\(?\s*1\s*[ulUL]*\s*<<\s*(\d+|$Ident)\s*\)?/$macroname($1)/;
Otherwise, fine by me.
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-05-21 14:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-05-20 10:43 [PATCH 0/6] Don't use BIT() macro in UAPI headers Joe Richey
2021-05-20 10:43 ` [PATCH 1/6] x86/elf: " Joe Richey
2021-05-20 10:43 ` [PATCH 2/6] KVM: X86: " Joe Richey
2021-05-20 15:46 ` Sean Christopherson
2021-05-20 10:43 ` [PATCH 3/6] drivers: firmware: psci: " Joe Richey
2021-05-20 10:43 ` [PATCH 4/6] uacce: " Joe Richey
2021-05-20 10:43 ` [PATCH 5/6] media: vicodec: " Joe Richey
2021-05-20 10:43 ` [PATCH 6/6] tools headers UAPI: Sync pkt_sched.h with the kernel sources Joe Richey
2021-05-20 11:07 ` [PATCH 0/6] Don't use BIT() macro in UAPI headers Borislav Petkov
2021-05-20 11:50 ` Joseph Richey
2021-05-20 15:59 ` Borislav Petkov
2021-05-20 15:50 ` Sean Christopherson
2021-05-20 11:11 ` Mark Rutland
2021-05-20 11:40 ` Joseph Richey
2021-05-20 12:09 ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-05-20 15:47 ` Sean Christopherson
2021-05-21 8:58 ` [PATCH v2 0/7] " Joe Richey
2021-05-21 8:58 ` [PATCH v2 1/7] x86/elf: Use _BITUL() " Joe Richey
2021-05-21 8:58 ` [PATCH v2 2/7] KVM: X86: " Joe Richey
2021-05-24 12:28 ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-05-21 8:58 ` [PATCH v2 3/7] drivers: firmware: psci: " Joe Richey
2021-05-21 13:25 ` Mark Rutland
2021-05-21 8:58 ` [PATCH v2 4/7] uacce: " Joe Richey
2021-05-21 13:56 ` Zhangfei Gao
2021-05-21 8:58 ` [PATCH v2 5/7] media: vicodec: " Joe Richey
2021-05-21 8:58 ` [PATCH v2 6/7] tools headers UAPI: Sync pkt_sched.h with the kernel sources Joe Richey
2021-05-21 8:58 ` [PATCH v2 7/7] checkpatch: suggest _BITULL() and _BITUL() for UAPI headers Joe Richey
2021-05-21 14:45 ` Joe Perches [this message]
2021-05-24 11:46 ` [PATCH 0/6] Don't use BIT() macro in " Christoph Hellwig
2021-05-24 12:29 ` Mark Rutland
2021-05-24 16:34 ` David Laight
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=9d8659fc8bc0729dd255c20234fb1a4210847ce9.camel@perches.com \
--to=joe@perches.com \
--cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=apw@canonical.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=chang.seok.bae@intel.com \
--cc=daniel.lezcano@linaro.org \
--cc=dwaipayanray1@gmail.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=hverkuil-cisco@xs4all.nl \
--cc=jean-philippe@linaro.org \
--cc=joerichey94@gmail.com \
--cc=joerichey@google.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lei.cao@stratus.com \
--cc=linux-accelerators@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-media@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com \
--cc=lukas.bulwahn@gmail.com \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=mchehab@kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=peterx@redhat.com \
--cc=rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com \
--cc=sashal@kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=trivial@kernel.org \
--cc=ulf.hansson@linaro.org \
--cc=wangzhou1@hisilicon.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
--cc=xuzaibo@huawei.com \
--cc=zhangfei.gao@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).