From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.0 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB33BC433F4 for ; Mon, 13 Jul 2020 16:34:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from merlin.infradead.org (merlin.infradead.org [205.233.59.134]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8D77F207FB for ; Mon, 13 Jul 2020 16:34:16 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lists.infradead.org header.i=@lists.infradead.org header.b="f1VeGGN9" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 8D77F207FB Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=holtmann.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=merlin.20170209; h=Sender:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-Type:Cc:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post:List-Archive: List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:To:References:Message-Id:Date:In-Reply-To:From: Subject:Mime-Version:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=H5oczGqdiYd2RoK321/XTIhS2cCqhj5EuNqN5veeG7k=; b=f1VeGGN9zZz+bGMw8j54rAioJ VGRwWc497mE0kEGqCHLoQAoNGpQ8D3HI0f7So23b+h7ZcGToA29hgNIFKd9lbw+MTmmQ+ISnn1taf LKlyx/LfY6lUbVpQvqc5iFdjmoouyYIkEH498Ht+DjsPlQsW6UmfB5/hPbfgCfUEfVIq32DDRrzUi dECNAnDHU1tVxkX6HFVsKwjtv9Bv6lZHmK7mIq1q1btfNrl39J0yf91N9ZWRdR/rjkBjUveB8TPrC 0OXCHeI4mW7Od7RxzowLVMUTmECpdJzmU+hzdryFz9qrY3ehF5CLo94/Sef6FmgMMCu+CK6kN9tgJ OxZAW/GSw==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=merlin.infradead.org) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1jv1Nu-00006o-4h; Mon, 13 Jul 2020 16:32:54 +0000 Received: from coyote.holtmann.net ([212.227.132.17] helo=mail.holtmann.org) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1jv1Nr-00005b-Ic for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Mon, 13 Jul 2020 16:32:52 +0000 Received: from marcel-macbook.fritz.box (p5b3d2638.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [91.61.38.56]) by mail.holtmann.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 1EE46CECC9; Mon, 13 Jul 2020 18:42:40 +0200 (CEST) Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.4 \(3608.80.23.2.2\)) Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] Bluetooth: Add new quirk for broken local ext features max_page From: Marcel Holtmann In-Reply-To: Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2020 18:32:41 +0200 Message-Id: References: <20200705195110.405139-1-anarsoul@gmail.com> <20200705195110.405139-2-anarsoul@gmail.com> <70578F86-20D3-41C7-A968-83B0605D3526@holtmann.org> To: Vasily Khoruzhick X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.80.23.2.2) X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20200713_123251_754136_B4F1A874 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 13.67 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Ondrej Jirman , devicetree , Johan Hedberg , "open list:NETWORKING \[GENERAL\]" , kernel list , Maxime Ripard , linux-bluetooth , Chen-Yu Tsai , Rob Herring , Jakub Kicinski , "David S. Miller" , arm-linux Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org Hi Vasily, >> maybe just the read sync train params command is broken? Can you change the init code and not send it and see if the rest of the init phase proceeds. I would rather have the secure connections actually tested before dismissing it altogether. > > I don't think that I have any devices that support secure connections > to test, I've got only a bluetooth mouse and headphones, both are from > the 2.0 era. > > FWIW unofficial recommendation from Realtek to Pine64 was to avoid > using any 4.1+ features on this chip. Unfortunately I don't have any > contacts with Realtek, so I can't confirm that. > >> Mind you, there were broken Broadcom implementation of connectionless slave broadcast as well. Maybe this is similar. > > I'd prefer to stick to what works unless there's some comprehensive > test that can figure out what's broken. check if removing the read sync trains params command makes the controller initialize and usable. Then we see about the rest. Regards Marcel _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel