linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jim Quinlan <james.quinlan@broadcom.com>
To: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
Cc: Peng Fan <peng.fan@nxp.com>,
	Bo Zhang <bozhang.zhang@broadcom.com>,
	Volodymyr Babchuk <volodymyr_babchuk@epam.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 07/11] firmware: arm_scmi: Add support for asynchronous commands and delayed response
Date: Thu, 18 Jul 2019 17:38:06 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CA+-6iNyFToC8QSf042OcqvAStvaF=voy_ohayvQBVCppgtyD7A@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190708154730.16643-8-sudeep.holla@arm.com>

Hi Sudeep,

Just a comment in general.  The asynchronous commands you are
implementing are not really asynchronous to the caller.  Yes it is is
"async" at the low level, but there is no way to use scmi_do_xfer() or
scmi_do_xfer_with_response()  and have the calling thread be able to
continue on in parallel with the command being processed by the
platform.   This will limit the types of applications that can use
SCMI (perhaps this is intentional).  I was hoping that true async
would be possible, and that the caller could also register a callback
function to be invoked  when the command was completed.  Is this
something that may be added in the future?  It does overlap with
notifications, because with those messages you will need some kind of
callback or handler thread.

BTW, if scmi_do_xfer_with_response()  returns --ETIMEDOUT the caller
has no way of knowing whether it was the command ack timeout or the
command execution timeout.

Regards,
Jim

On Mon, Jul 8, 2019 at 11:47 AM Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com> wrote:
>
> Messages that are sent to platform, also known as commands and can be:
>
> 1. Synchronous commands that block the channel until the requested work
> has been completed. The platform responds to these commands over the
> same channel and hence can't be used to send another command until the
> previous command has completed.
>
> 2. Asynchronous commands on the other hand, the platform schedules the
> requested work to complete later in time and returns almost immediately
> freeing the channel for new commands. The response indicates the success
> or failure in the ability to schedule the requested work. When the work
> has completed, the platform sends an additional delayed response message.
>
> Using the same transmit buffer used for sending the asynchronous command
> even for the delayed response corresponding to it simplifies handling of
> the delayed response. It's the caller of asynchronous command that is
> responsible for allocating the completion flag that scmi driver can
> complete to indicate the arrival of delayed response.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
> ---
>  drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/common.h |  6 ++++-
>  drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/driver.c | 43 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
>  2 files changed, 46 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/common.h b/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/common.h
> index 4349d836b392..f89fa3f74a6f 100644
> --- a/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/common.h
> +++ b/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/common.h
> @@ -84,17 +84,21 @@ struct scmi_msg {
>   * @rx: Receive message, the buffer should be pre-allocated to store
>   *     message. If request-ACK protocol is used, we can reuse the same
>   *     buffer for the rx path as we use for the tx path.
> - * @done: completion event
> + * @done: command message transmit completion event
> + * @async: pointer to delayed response message received event completion
>   */
>  struct scmi_xfer {
>         struct scmi_msg_hdr hdr;
>         struct scmi_msg tx;
>         struct scmi_msg rx;
>         struct completion done;
> +       struct completion *async_done;
>  };
>
>  void scmi_xfer_put(const struct scmi_handle *h, struct scmi_xfer *xfer);
>  int scmi_do_xfer(const struct scmi_handle *h, struct scmi_xfer *xfer);
> +int scmi_do_xfer_with_response(const struct scmi_handle *h,
> +                              struct scmi_xfer *xfer);
>  int scmi_xfer_get_init(const struct scmi_handle *h, u8 msg_id, u8 prot_id,
>                        size_t tx_size, size_t rx_size, struct scmi_xfer **p);
>  int scmi_handle_put(const struct scmi_handle *handle);
> diff --git a/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/driver.c b/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/driver.c
> index b384c818d8dd..049bb4af6b60 100644
> --- a/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/driver.c
> +++ b/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/driver.c
> @@ -347,6 +347,8 @@ __scmi_xfer_put(struct scmi_xfers_info *minfo, struct scmi_xfer *xfer)
>   */
>  static void scmi_rx_callback(struct mbox_client *cl, void *m)
>  {
> +       u8 msg_type;
> +       u32 msg_hdr;
>         u16 xfer_id;
>         struct scmi_xfer *xfer;
>         struct scmi_chan_info *cinfo = client_to_scmi_chan_info(cl);
> @@ -355,7 +357,12 @@ static void scmi_rx_callback(struct mbox_client *cl, void *m)
>         struct scmi_xfers_info *minfo = &info->tx_minfo;
>         struct scmi_shared_mem __iomem *mem = cinfo->payload;
>
> -       xfer_id = MSG_XTRACT_TOKEN(ioread32(&mem->msg_header));
> +       msg_hdr = ioread32(&mem->msg_header);
> +       msg_type = MSG_XTRACT_TYPE(msg_hdr);
> +       xfer_id = MSG_XTRACT_TOKEN(msg_hdr);
> +
> +       if (msg_type == MSG_TYPE_NOTIFICATION)
> +               return; /* Notifications not yet supported */
>
>         /* Are we even expecting this? */
>         if (!test_bit(xfer_id, minfo->xfer_alloc_table)) {
> @@ -368,7 +375,11 @@ static void scmi_rx_callback(struct mbox_client *cl, void *m)
>         scmi_dump_header_dbg(dev, &xfer->hdr);
>
>         scmi_fetch_response(xfer, mem);
> -       complete(&xfer->done);
> +
> +       if (msg_type == MSG_TYPE_DELAYED_RESP)
> +               complete(xfer->async_done);
> +       else
> +               complete(&xfer->done);
>  }
>
>  /**
> @@ -472,6 +483,34 @@ int scmi_do_xfer(const struct scmi_handle *handle, struct scmi_xfer *xfer)
>         return ret;
>  }
>
> +#define SCMI_MAX_RESPONSE_TIMEOUT      (2 * MSEC_PER_SEC)
> +
> +/**
> + * scmi_do_xfer_with_response() - Do one transfer and wait until the delayed
> + *     response is received
> + *
> + * @handle: Pointer to SCMI entity handle
> + * @xfer: Transfer to initiate and wait for response
> + *
> + * Return: -ETIMEDOUT in case of no delayed response, if transmit error,
> + *     return corresponding error, else if all goes well, return 0.
> + */
> +int scmi_do_xfer_with_response(const struct scmi_handle *handle,
> +                              struct scmi_xfer *xfer)
> +{
> +       int ret, timeout = msecs_to_jiffies(SCMI_MAX_RESPONSE_TIMEOUT);
> +       DECLARE_COMPLETION_ONSTACK(async_response);
> +
> +       xfer->async_done = &async_response;
> +
> +       ret = scmi_do_xfer(handle, xfer);
> +       if (!ret && !wait_for_completion_timeout(xfer->async_done, timeout))
> +               ret = -ETIMEDOUT;
> +
> +       xfer->async_done = NULL;
> +       return ret;
> +}
> +
>  /**
>   * scmi_xfer_get_init() - Allocate and initialise one message for transmit
>   *
> --
> 2.17.1
>

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

  reply	other threads:[~2019-07-18 21:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-07-08 15:47 [PATCH 00/11] firmware: arm_scmi: Add support for Rx, async commands and delayed response Sudeep Holla
2019-07-08 15:47 ` [PATCH 01/11] firmware: arm_scmi: Reorder some functions to avoid forward declarations Sudeep Holla
2019-07-08 15:47 ` [PATCH 02/11] firmware: arm_scmi: Segregate tx channel handling and prepare to add rx Sudeep Holla
2019-07-18 21:23   ` Jim Quinlan
2019-07-19 10:26     ` Sudeep Holla
2019-07-08 15:47 ` [PATCH 03/11] firmware: arm_scmi: Add receive channel support for notifications Sudeep Holla
2019-07-08 15:47 ` [PATCH 04/11] firmware: arm_scmi: Separate out tx buffer handling and prepare to add rx Sudeep Holla
2019-07-08 15:47 ` [PATCH 05/11] firmware: arm_scmi: Add receive buffer support for notifications Sudeep Holla
2019-07-18 21:24   ` Jim Quinlan
     [not found]   ` <CA+-6iNz26xUyrzVSbWA+jwEfj3BC8k8KNCg2SreDK7mfWsbAWg@mail.gmail.com>
2019-07-19 10:29     ` Sudeep Holla
2019-07-08 15:47 ` [PATCH 06/11] firmware: arm_scmi: Add mechanism to unpack message headers Sudeep Holla
2019-07-08 15:47 ` [PATCH 07/11] firmware: arm_scmi: Add support for asynchronous commands and delayed response Sudeep Holla
2019-07-18 21:38   ` Jim Quinlan [this message]
2019-07-19 11:03     ` Sudeep Holla
2019-07-19 20:16       ` Jim Quinlan
2019-07-22 13:08         ` Sudeep Holla
2019-07-08 15:47 ` [PATCH 08/11] firmware: arm_scmi: Drop async flag in sensor_ops->reading_get Sudeep Holla
2019-07-08 16:05   ` Guenter Roeck
2019-07-08 15:47 ` [PATCH 09/11] firmware: arm_scmi: Add asynchronous sensor read if it supports Sudeep Holla
2019-07-08 15:47 ` [PATCH 10/11] firmware: arm_scmi: Drop config flag in clk_ops->rate_set Sudeep Holla
2019-07-22 21:30   ` Stephen Boyd
2019-07-08 15:47 ` [PATCH 11/11] firmware: arm_scmi: Use asynchronous CLOCK_RATE_SET when possible Sudeep Holla
2019-07-22 21:29   ` Stephen Boyd
2019-07-23 10:59     ` Sudeep Holla

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CA+-6iNyFToC8QSf042OcqvAStvaF=voy_ohayvQBVCppgtyD7A@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=james.quinlan@broadcom.com \
    --cc=bozhang.zhang@broadcom.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=peng.fan@nxp.com \
    --cc=sudeep.holla@arm.com \
    --cc=volodymyr_babchuk@epam.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).