linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: sunil.kovvuri@gmail.com (Sunil Kovvuri)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v2] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Increase CMDQ drain timeout value
Date: Mon, 29 May 2017 14:41:59 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CA+sq2Cc_6Wj-0wLG=5fTAS66Tyn=63=An-Ay7h=EV=mjDi2-MQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1493983066-28202-1-git-send-email-sunil.kovvuri@gmail.com>

On Fri, May 5, 2017 at 4:47 PM,  <sunil.kovvuri@gmail.com> wrote:
> From: Sunil Goutham <sgoutham@cavium.com>
>
> Processing queue full of TLB invalidation commands might
> take more time on some platforms than current timeout
> of 100us. So increased drain timeout value.
>
> Also now udelay time is increased exponentially for each poll.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sunil Goutham <sgoutham@cavium.com>
> ---
>
> v2
> - Addressed Will's and Robin's comments i.e
>   increased poll timeout only for drain case and removed spin loop
>   whose logic anyway is screwed up.
> - Also changed commit subject and message as this patch no longer
>   exactly reflects what is done in SMMU driver i.e
>   8513c8930069 iommu/arm-smmu: Poll for TLB sync completion more effectively
>
>  drivers/iommu/arm-smmu-v3.c | 15 +++++++++++++--
>  1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu-v3.c b/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu-v3.c
> index d412bdd..cbc8309 100644
> --- a/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu-v3.c
> +++ b/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu-v3.c
> @@ -379,6 +379,8 @@
>  #define CMDQ_SYNC_0_CS_NONE            (0UL << CMDQ_SYNC_0_CS_SHIFT)
>  #define CMDQ_SYNC_0_CS_SEV             (2UL << CMDQ_SYNC_0_CS_SHIFT)
>
> +#define CMDQ_DRAIN_TIMEOUT_US          1000
> +
>  /* Event queue */
>  #define EVTQ_ENT_DWORDS                        4
>  #define EVTQ_MAX_SZ_SHIFT              7
> @@ -737,7 +739,12 @@ static void queue_inc_prod(struct arm_smmu_queue *q)
>   */
>  static int queue_poll_cons(struct arm_smmu_queue *q, bool drain, bool wfe)
>  {
> -       ktime_t timeout = ktime_add_us(ktime_get(), ARM_SMMU_POLL_TIMEOUT_US);
> +       ktime_t timeout;
> +       unsigned int delay = 1;
> +
> +       /* Wait longer if it's queue drain */
> +       timeout = ktime_add_us(ktime_get(), drain ? CMDQ_DRAIN_TIMEOUT_US :
> +                                                   ARM_SMMU_POLL_TIMEOUT_US);
>
>         while (queue_sync_cons(q), (drain ? !queue_empty(q) : queue_full(q))) {
>                 if (ktime_compare(ktime_get(), timeout) > 0)
> @@ -747,7 +754,11 @@ static int queue_poll_cons(struct arm_smmu_queue *q, bool drain, bool wfe)
>                         wfe();
>                 } else {
>                         cpu_relax();
> -                       udelay(1);
> +                       udelay(delay);
> +                       /* No point in sleeping for fixed time,
> +                        * if cons isn't moving fast.
> +                        */
> +                       delay *= 2;
>                 }
>         }
>
> --
> 2.7.4
>

Gentle reminder for patch review.

Thanks,
Sunil.

  reply	other threads:[~2017-05-29  9:11 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-05-05 11:17 [PATCH v2] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Increase CMDQ drain timeout value sunil.kovvuri at gmail.com
2017-05-29  9:11 ` Sunil Kovvuri [this message]
2017-05-30 11:18   ` Will Deacon

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CA+sq2Cc_6Wj-0wLG=5fTAS66Tyn=63=An-Ay7h=EV=mjDi2-MQ@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=sunil.kovvuri@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).