From: Shengjiu Wang <shengjiu.wang@gmail.com>
To: Lucas Stach <l.stach@pengutronix.de>
Cc: sumit.semwal@linaro.org, linaro-mm-sig@lists.linaro.org,
Linux-ALSA <alsa-devel@alsa-project.org>,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Timur Tabi <timur@kernel.org>, Xiubo Li <Xiubo.Lee@gmail.com>,
shawnguo@kernel.org, Shengjiu Wang <shengjiu.wang@nxp.com>,
Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.com>,
Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@gmail.com>,
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, perex@perex.cz,
Nicolin Chen <nicoleotsuka@gmail.com>,
Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>,
linux-imx@nxp.com, kernel@pengutronix.de,
Fabio Estevam <festevam@gmail.com>,
s.hauer@pengutronix.de, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-media@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ASoC: fsl: imx-pcm-dma: Don't request dma channel in probe
Date: Wed, 20 May 2020 19:22:19 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAA+D8APAMRwtVneqFsuBgAhozmQo3R0AQi0bVdUCQO4Af4xVfw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <53258cd99caaf1199036737f8fad6cc097939567.camel@pengutronix.de>
Hi
On Wed, May 20, 2020 at 5:42 PM Lucas Stach <l.stach@pengutronix.de> wrote:
>
> Am Mittwoch, den 20.05.2020, 16:20 +0800 schrieb Shengjiu Wang:
> > Hi
> >
> > On Tue, May 19, 2020 at 6:04 PM Lucas Stach <l.stach@pengutronix.de> wrote:
> > > Am Dienstag, den 19.05.2020, 17:41 +0800 schrieb Shengjiu Wang:
> > > > There are two requirements that we need to move the request
> > > > of dma channel from probe to open.
> > >
> > > How do you handle -EPROBE_DEFER return code from the channel request if
> > > you don't do it in probe?
> >
> > I use the dma_request_slave_channel or dma_request_channel instead
> > of dmaengine_pcm_request_chan_of. so there should be not -EPROBE_DEFER
> > return code.
>
> This is a pretty weak argument. The dmaengine device might probe after
> you try to get the channel. Using a function to request the channel
> that doesn't allow you to handle probe deferral is IMHO a bug and
> should be fixed, instead of building even more assumptions on top of
> it.
>
I see some driver also request dma channel in open() or hw_params().
how can they avoid the defer probe issue?
for example:
sound/arm/pxa2xx-pcm-lib.c
sound/soc/sprd/sprd-pcm-dma.c
> > > > - When dma device binds with power-domains, the power will
> > > > be enabled when we request dma channel. If the request of dma
> > > > channel happen on probe, then the power-domains will be always
> > > > enabled after kernel boot up, which is not good for power
> > > > saving, so we need to move the request of dma channel to .open();
> > >
> > > This is certainly something which could be fixed in the dmaengine
> > > driver.
> >
> > Dma driver always call the pm_runtime_get_sync in
> > device_alloc_chan_resources, the device_alloc_chan_resources is
> > called when channel is requested. so power is enabled on channel
> > request.
>
> So why can't you fix the dmaengine driver to do that RPM call at a
> later time when the channel is actually going to be used? This will
> allow further power savings with other slave devices than the audio
> PCM.
>
> Regards,
> Lucas
>
It seems the best place for calling pm_runtime_get_sync is the
device_alloc_chan_resources, and calling pm_runtime_put_sync
in the .device_free_chan_resources
For the slave_sg mode, the .device_prep_slave_sg and
.device_issue_pending will be called many times after
.device_alloc_chan_resources. so it is not good to call
pm_runtime_get_sync in .device_prep_slave_sg or
.device_issue_pending
best regards
wang shengjiu
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-05-20 11:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-05-19 9:41 [PATCH] ASoC: fsl: imx-pcm-dma: Don't request dma channel in probe Shengjiu Wang
2020-05-19 10:01 ` Lucas Stach
2020-05-20 8:20 ` Shengjiu Wang
2020-05-20 9:42 ` Lucas Stach
2020-05-20 11:22 ` Shengjiu Wang [this message]
2020-05-20 12:38 ` Mark Brown
2020-05-21 11:30 ` Shengjiu Wang
2020-05-22 13:12 ` Mark Brown
2021-04-14 14:33 ` Robin Gong
2021-04-14 15:33 ` Lucas Stach
2021-04-19 7:17 ` Robin Gong
2021-04-19 9:46 ` Lucas Stach
2021-04-20 13:47 ` Robin Gong
2021-04-20 14:00 ` Lucas Stach
2021-04-21 14:54 ` Robin Gong
2021-04-21 17:43 ` Lucas Stach
2021-04-21 17:46 ` Mark Brown
2021-04-22 3:33 ` Robin Gong
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CAA+D8APAMRwtVneqFsuBgAhozmQo3R0AQi0bVdUCQO4Af4xVfw@mail.gmail.com \
--to=shengjiu.wang@gmail.com \
--cc=Xiubo.Lee@gmail.com \
--cc=alsa-devel@alsa-project.org \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=festevam@gmail.com \
--cc=kernel@pengutronix.de \
--cc=l.stach@pengutronix.de \
--cc=lgirdwood@gmail.com \
--cc=linaro-mm-sig@lists.linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-imx@nxp.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-media@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=nicoleotsuka@gmail.com \
--cc=perex@perex.cz \
--cc=s.hauer@pengutronix.de \
--cc=shawnguo@kernel.org \
--cc=shengjiu.wang@nxp.com \
--cc=sumit.semwal@linaro.org \
--cc=timur@kernel.org \
--cc=tiwai@suse.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).