From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.8 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C169C32756 for ; Fri, 9 Aug 2019 18:34:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DAD8A20C01 for ; Fri, 9 Aug 2019 18:34:31 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lists.infradead.org header.i=@lists.infradead.org header.b="Fb1hf/1b"; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key) header.d=intel-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com header.i=@intel-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com header.b="uNRSX3SR" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org DAD8A20C01 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-arm-kernel-bounces+infradead-linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20170209; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:Cc:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:To:Subject:Message-ID:Date:From: In-Reply-To:References:MIME-Version:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=G5uyjNwCJIJYFiabfLv8XcUZ04aXeQ6YzLIDQAhvKfo=; b=Fb1hf/1bJoAPsG 8IbNt2BU44M+sINTXq/61qx9KmDzyTWuuWycXVJ1Vpz6cxnlVjwSDKFiptjAOZg2Nh5+qvT0R8X5f 4CpL6IOYUkSeuhK8T1DEhX+6UXmxQ+GO0QqsA/algDb1OZ+rFSuFN1YEUoRRUjb2GmRts75TJpBi+ mNCrfZ/24zvrnkLwbPQ6Ak/Cc8CdOUwuZ7njPIMjnDuOsxvkHNQgjD40pq+uSyscvqAk2VpWfovSY EvwN8pNQHJg8goem//zZBRTfW+JbjfMzQJ6eJPs+tXXAQZKPBCiiLLEnEpiDyFwpAxHNHa5yDUVKb GWP2Zg2C62j0OC43m8nQ==; Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1hw9ih-0007V4-8q; Fri, 09 Aug 2019 18:34:31 +0000 Received: from mail-ot1-x344.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4864:20::344]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.92 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1hw9ic-0007Tp-87 for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Fri, 09 Aug 2019 18:34:30 +0000 Received: by mail-ot1-x344.google.com with SMTP id q20so136113006otl.0 for ; Fri, 09 Aug 2019 11:34:24 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=intel-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=AKmwT4Oi8XTfOBRZ+EHljM27mGDbATZqErOPdgBZ4Co=; b=uNRSX3SRj+xP7NvVoVokIMCRX8HCckf6BPeA7+psneOxE6/T6dicMcRo/VV/vCJxhH 2ah1jUGPfiEAX0QZe8uTSWR6gFWhgEkVpd7BLRD+hlm1cr791u27ba3ZV816f72C1ok8 DJvRUpLPV43j5Uaws2WuWHOl5aDZAhlefm6RklI/GKafNpFMkZ7uGhbJLlx6oN0VDFGK p9qsSUzTb1aagLcVK1DFaMoBq3cp8E+gw3IHnqJRv0XMMx6N9H/htf+j/p8DpyKdONPx 7eeraJq2zzFsYaU+6cMltnQHj6kObut6IugXtD7G6VOMY3hT8BtTcsGD9yo4ss/GdWjx jZcA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=AKmwT4Oi8XTfOBRZ+EHljM27mGDbATZqErOPdgBZ4Co=; b=KMpotreOcZoOqN6wMKMmmQB9g9urRZAd2CizM274NgYyDii2uk+OUSHxPT5/YKiQ9G Uc42c6EiHME+ncS9iCQUb7d2qjbln2lpcDYHaW8W7sxccuz4qZsgdy0YHGgakLyLYc9d Zumx764Dmt3Yw43To2/IkfTCWJrnHpWP1dBv0p8eQo/iR28OoaEyPJONL9pate+umfsm 6hI4dtW36Ufr0ldiL91l7twnLfjwYvj5sUTR0MBYItAiOqzsbqCa1qXCYAGQY/5iCuaQ nOxcFPpuNDbqP4oLgfyTu31hVG1d/7wbMeeYB7fUr5txGVZfCQ2yv/cw2bRv89wk/1M7 bd0Q== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAVXT0SDPP7pAoQ2GfW40hA353mtmYQGzJYHILQCAkiRNTsGsJzQ L3eU6W7w+69kdiMeoiDP7FKYAyTpU3vLIug5nwA= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqxeNb9oXB+s8Utamw3Uuce2Zu+9B+X1DtgWilPG1ZjoTGNqEEBHw02QzXop4CuNga1GSGo5G+1XOzKOUdUwEcY= X-Received: by 2002:a5d:9a04:: with SMTP id s4mr22651344iol.19.1565375663936; Fri, 09 Aug 2019 11:34:23 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20190809162956.488941-1-arnd@arndb.de> <20190809163334.489360-1-arnd@arndb.de> In-Reply-To: <20190809163334.489360-1-arnd@arndb.de> From: Dan Williams Date: Fri, 9 Aug 2019 11:34:12 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/7] [RFC] ARM: remove Intel iop33x and iop13xx support To: Arnd Bergmann X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20190809_113428_671259_08F6ED53 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 13.80 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org, Linux Kernel Mailing List , Linus Walleij , soc@kernel.org, Russell King , Bartosz Golaszewski , Vinod Koul , linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org, dmaengine@vger.kernel.org, Martin Michlmayr , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+infradead-linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org [ add Martin (if cyrius.com address is still valid) ] On Fri, Aug 9, 2019 at 9:35 AM Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > There are three families of IOP machines we support in Linux: iop32x > (which includes EP80219), iop33x and iop13xx (aka IOP34x aka WP8134x). > > All products we support in the kernel are based on the first of these, > iop32x, the other families only ever supported the Intel reference > boards but no actual machine anyone could ever buy. > > While one could clearly make them all three work in a single kernel > with some work, this takes the easy way out, removing the later two > platforms entirely, under the assumption that there are no remaining > users. > > Earlier versions of OpenWRT and Debian both had support for iop32x > but not the others, and they both dropped iop32x as well in their 2015 > releases. > > Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann > --- > I'm just guessing that iop32x is still needed, and the other two are > not. If anyone disagrees with that assessment, let me know so we > can come up with an alternative approach. I'm not sure who would scream if iop32x support went away as well, but I have not followed this space in years hence copying Martin. In any event: Acked-by: Dan Williams _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel