From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: tfiga@chromium.org (Tomasz Figa) Date: Fri, 12 Aug 2016 16:46:06 +0900 Subject: [PATCH 7/8] iommu: of: Handle IOMMU lookup failure with deferred probing or error In-Reply-To: <1470696550-3416-8-git-send-email-sricharan@codeaurora.org> References: <1470696550-3416-1-git-send-email-sricharan@codeaurora.org> <1470696550-3416-8-git-send-email-sricharan@codeaurora.org> Message-ID: To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org Hi, On Tue, Aug 9, 2016 at 7:49 AM, Sricharan R wrote: > + > + if (ops->add_device) > + ops = ops->add_device(dev) ? ops : NULL; Patch description fails to mention anything about this change. Also it looks slightly incorrect to lose the error condition here. I think we should at least print some error message here and tell the user that we are falling back to non-IOMMU setup. > > of_node_put(np); > idx++; > @@ -200,7 +213,7 @@ const struct iommu_ops *of_iommu_configure(struct device *dev, > > err_put_node: > of_node_put(np); > - return NULL; > + return ops; > } > > void __init of_iommu_init(void) > @@ -211,7 +224,7 @@ void __init of_iommu_init(void) > for_each_matching_node_and_match(np, matches, &match) { > const of_iommu_init_fn init_fn = match->data; > > - if (init_fn(np)) > + if (init_fn && init_fn(np)) When is it possible to have NULL init_fn? > pr_err("Failed to initialise IOMMU %s\n", > of_node_full_name(np)); > } > diff --git a/drivers/of/device.c b/drivers/of/device.c > index e1fad50..92e02dc 100644 > --- a/drivers/of/device.c > +++ b/drivers/of/device.c > @@ -149,6 +149,8 @@ int of_dma_configure_ops(struct device *dev, struct device_node *np) > coherent ? " " : " not "); > > iommu = of_iommu_configure(dev, np); > + if (IS_ERR(iommu)) > + return PTR_ERR(iommu); nit: Would be good to add a blank line here for improved readability. > dev_dbg(dev, "device is%sbehind an iommu\n", > iommu ? " " : " not "); > Best regards, Tomasz