From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9635FC3A5A7 for ; Wed, 4 Sep 2019 09:11:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6875D21670 for ; Wed, 4 Sep 2019 09:11:27 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lists.infradead.org header.i=@lists.infradead.org header.b="ktK8UtoJ"; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=chromium.org header.i=@chromium.org header.b="emVBmdVn" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 6875D21670 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=chromium.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-arm-kernel-bounces+infradead-linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20170209; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:Cc:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:To:Subject:Message-ID:Date:From: In-Reply-To:References:MIME-Version:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=VSHTcTxY/FV2IZMWILemlcCquyMplEUIM6bxdW86CVY=; b=ktK8UtoJ9o/Zex KYK8Y+iSwqn6jOuIQFJt7rqXQnFgB4FvWS1RkLSB7Sb/fpaynpnmDKHoPR5X6XYofhmlohs75l3q/ mNCPcA2lvk7QL5ifru0oqWHzcbTaBHj4WyLxDxit0kkAg3/7uBEtWgNtDnUyvJ65d5aF1rU7ImRyk Rjwfvkd+uU1Xb953IYS+J7kXPzMRpshdcju9NIqGG46iCjwY7OwvWY04gR/mKa3PoFI7c+w/WSgyM h9/3ycgoxjhHKZFu1NkJj/K0fvKSwBGtnQomEFCG1AwXgHkhYbt4+dQhhFoOMs3QGMLtsIAhhE+42 jaeOdUmZMDitYEWurntg==; Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1i5RK1-0006Nx-GJ; Wed, 04 Sep 2019 09:11:25 +0000 Received: from mail-ed1-x544.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::544]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.92 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1i5RJx-0006Nd-4e for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Wed, 04 Sep 2019 09:11:23 +0000 Received: by mail-ed1-x544.google.com with SMTP id o9so10152447edq.0 for ; Wed, 04 Sep 2019 02:11:21 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=chromium.org; s=google; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=SlDNtvqTlkGND+OCwOrEAc9WxGs6zVmm0CCR8hqfXtY=; b=emVBmdVn3njvoS0f5ToN11EX9aUXnklC3C3insakwJUhhJdsrlTeLOXf+xKsRDQphe wZAsgkupoxnLiP2Q2s7z0/0dh2FqGDSeHmBaBvWy6BY3nz2HDBycedrYQKfZczVihSFP aMax4R7LJc6TtXP/f0klf6tm1yXNU3UjFRWfE= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=SlDNtvqTlkGND+OCwOrEAc9WxGs6zVmm0CCR8hqfXtY=; b=G/BU1lV9dmezecHUPRkW9Ytv7fgjkB6ut0UxpKAyzbhkEaobF56dX71Drra3SC/cjI Z3ElMWTSPV7tbqNMkRQvRkzIHKKgt5UwZByk8pSiXwogM36eNZ37H+E6B3lMQyI9Jp3P MIqe5eDxFq/DbwlqlBPOMapOmo2/5fDJYJ1WcychMTfusveIF0EihZ2NVmVwzROFunVh zrjDR1g+UGmnquN2TRRGtWEZcCJUtEm7c3sKFahSMaVpg+4PMGDm/Oi0OX8oRtRdW0t0 6/H0dljBAqwJ7GOvJmYOAszcmmKMD2zupzl5+k+PXeHjSYXS03RhgwrTpUl4qdmnn5ZU SuQQ== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAW4CDlj/AMKHapJMFpJJBe8x17MS5uWR5V0xmV4eRIzyrmYRSVh TR1wPzttDiz1bidwbMEslUkHZWUm/RK96w== X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqxtayeMzLuqMpop/HpxwbGBPLuTRz3MDus7pEq4BDhc9GeDKZV7Diw5cg/shQCPevI0F8Wk4A== X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:94c5:: with SMTP id d5mr6401899ejy.180.1567588279669; Wed, 04 Sep 2019 02:11:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-wm1-f53.google.com (mail-wm1-f53.google.com. [209.85.128.53]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id b36sm3318524edc.53.2019.09.04.02.11.19 for (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 04 Sep 2019 02:11:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-wm1-f53.google.com with SMTP id q19so2413133wmc.3 for ; Wed, 04 Sep 2019 02:11:19 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 2002:a05:600c:240a:: with SMTP id 10mr3651794wmp.113.1567587851370; Wed, 04 Sep 2019 02:04:11 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1562661672-22439-1-git-send-email-Jerry-Ch.chen@mediatek.com> <1562661672-22439-5-git-send-email-Jerry-Ch.chen@mediatek.com> <20190802082815.GA203993@chromium.org> <1566724680.20680.8.camel@mtksdccf07> <1566957625.20680.33.camel@mtksdccf07> <1567424859.18318.32.camel@mtksdccf07> <1567493081.18318.49.camel@mtksdccf07> <1567511169.18318.65.camel@mtksdccf07> <1567568281.18318.80.camel@mtksdccf07> <1567577389.18318.100.camel@mtksdccf07> <1567584577.22453.11.camel@mtksdccf07> <1567587708.22453.15.camel@mtksdccf07> In-Reply-To: <1567587708.22453.15.camel@mtksdccf07> From: Tomasz Figa Date: Wed, 4 Sep 2019 18:03:59 +0900 X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: Message-ID: Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH V2 4/4] platform: mtk-isp: Add Mediatek FD driver To: Jerry-ch Chen X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20190904_021121_317807_24A7E821 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 35.34 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: "devicetree@vger.kernel.org" , =?UTF-8?B?U2VhbiBDaGVuZyAo6YSt5piH5byYKQ==?= , "laurent.pinchart+renesas@ideasonboard.com" , =?UTF-8?B?UnlubiBXdSAo5ZCz6IKy5oGpKQ==?= , srv_heupstream , =?UTF-8?B?UG8tWWFuZyBIdWFuZyAo6buD5p+P6Zm9KQ==?= , "mchehab@kernel.org" , "suleiman@chromium.org" , "shik@chromium.org" , =?UTF-8?B?SnVuZ28gTGluICjmnpfmmI7kv4op?= , =?UTF-8?B?U2ogSHVhbmcgKOm7g+S/oeeSiyk=?= , "yuzhao@chromium.org" , "linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org" , "zwisler@chromium.org" , "matthias.bgg@gmail.com" , =?UTF-8?B?Q2hyaXN0aWUgWXUgKOa4uOmbheaDoCk=?= , =?UTF-8?B?RnJlZGVyaWMgQ2hlbiAo6Zmz5L+K5YWDKQ==?= , "hans.verkuil@cisco.com" , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , "linux-media@vger.kernel.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+infradead-linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Wed, Sep 4, 2019 at 6:02 PM Jerry-ch Chen wrote: > > Hi Tomasz, > > On Wed, 2019-09-04 at 16:25 +0800, Tomasz Figa wrote: > > On Wed, Sep 4, 2019 at 5:09 PM Jerry-ch Chen wrote: > > > > > > Hi Tomasz, > > > > > > On Wed, 2019-09-04 at 14:34 +0800, Tomasz Figa wrote: > > > > On Wed, Sep 4, 2019 at 3:09 PM Jerry-ch Chen wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Hi Tomasz, > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, 2019-09-04 at 12:15 +0800, Tomasz Figa wrote: > > > > > > On Wed, Sep 4, 2019 at 12:38 PM Jerry-ch Chen > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi Tomasz, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, 2019-09-03 at 20:05 +0800, Tomasz Figa wrote: > > > > > > > > On Tue, Sep 3, 2019 at 8:46 PM Jerry-ch Chen wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi Tomasz, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, 2019-09-03 at 15:04 +0800, Tomasz Figa wrote: > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Sep 3, 2019 at 3:44 PM Jerry-ch Chen wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, 2019-09-03 at 13:19 +0800, Tomasz Figa wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > On Mon, Sep 2, 2019 at 8:47 PM Jerry-ch Chen wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi Tomasz, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Fri, 2019-08-30 at 16:33 +0800, Tomasz Figa wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, Aug 28, 2019 at 11:00 AM Jerry-ch Chen > > > > > > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi Tomasz, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Mon, 2019-08-26 at 14:36 +0800, Tomasz Figa wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi Jerry, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Sun, Aug 25, 2019 at 6:18 PM Jerry-ch Chen > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi Tomasz, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Fri, 2019-08-02 at 16:28 +0800, Tomasz Figa wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi Jerry, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Jul 09, 2019 at 04:41:12PM +0800, Jerry-ch Chen wrote: > > > > > > > [snip] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [snip] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > +static void mtk_fd_vb2_stop_streaming(struct vb2_queue *vq) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > +{ > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > + struct mtk_fd_ctx *ctx = vb2_get_drv_priv(vq); > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > + struct vb2_buffer *vb; > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > How do we guarantee here that the hardware isn't still accessing the buffers > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > removed below? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Maybe we can check the driver state flag and aborting the unfinished > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > jobs? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > (fd_hw->state == FD_ENQ) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Yes, we need to either cancel or wait for the currently processing > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > job. It depends on hardware capabilities, but cancelling is generally > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > preferred for the lower latency. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Ok, it the state is ENQ, then we can disable the FD hw by controlling > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > the registers. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > for example: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > writel(0x0, fd->fd_base + FD_HW_ENABLE); > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > writel(0x0, fd->fd_base + FD_INT_EN); > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > What's exactly the effect of writing 0 to FD_HW_ENABLE? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Sorry, my last reply didn't solve the question, > > > > > > > > > > > > > we should implement a mtk_fd_job_abort() for v4l2_m2m_ops(). > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > which is able to readl_poll_timeout_atomic() > > > > > > > > > > > > > and check the HW busy bits in the register FD_INT_EN; > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > if they are not cleared until timeout, we could handle the last > > > > > > > > > > > > > processing job. > > > > > > > > > > > > > Otherwise, the FD irq handler should have handled the last processing > > > > > > > > > > > > > job and we could continue the stop_streaming(). > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > For job_abort(): > > > > > > > > > > > > > static void mtk_fd_job_abort(void *priv) > > > > > > > > > > > > > { > > > > > > > > > > > > > struct mtk_fd_ctx *ctx = priv; > > > > > > > > > > > > > struct mtk_fd_dev *fd = ctx->fd_dev; > > > > > > > > > > > > > u32 val; > > > > > > > > > > > > > u32 ret; > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ret = readl_poll_timeout_atomic(fd->fd_base + MTK_FD_REG_OFFSET_INT_EN, > > > > > > > > > > > > > val, > > > > > > > > > > > > > (val & MTK_FD_HW_BUSY_MASK) == > > > > > > > > > > > > > MTK_FD_HW_STATE_IS_BUSY, > > > > > > > > > > > > > USEC_PER_MSEC, MTK_FD_STOP_HW_TIMEOUT); > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hmm, would it be possible to avoid the busy wait by having a > > > > > > > > > > > > completion that could be signalled from the interrupt handler? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Best regards, > > > > > > > > > > > > Tomasz > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I suppose that would be wakeup a wait queue in the interrupt handler, > > > > > > > > > > > the the wait_event_interrupt_timeout() will be used in here and system > > > > > > > > > > > suspend e.g. mtk_fd_suspend(). > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Yes, that should work. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Or do you suggest to wait_event_interrupt_timeout() every frame in the > > > > > > > > > > > mtk_fd_ipi_handler()? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Nope, we shouldn't need that. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I think maybe the readl_poll_timeout_atomic would be good enough. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Not really. Busy waiting should be avoided as much as possible. What's > > > > > > > > > > the point of entering suspend if you end up burning the power by > > > > > > > > > > spinning the CPU for some milliseconds? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Ok, I see, busy waiting is not a good idea, I will use the wait queue > > > > > > > > > instead. the job abort will refine as following: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > static void mtk_fd_job_abort(void *priv) > > > > > > > > > { > > > > > > > > > struct mtk_fd_ctx *ctx = priv; > > > > > > > > > struct mtk_fd_dev *fd = ctx->fd_dev; > > > > > > > > > u32 ret; > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ret = wait_event_interruptible_timeout > > > > > > > > > (fd->wq, (fd->fd_irq_result & MTK_FD_HW_IRQ_MASK), > > > > > > > > > usecs_to_jiffies(50000)); > > > > > > > > > if (ret) > > > > > > > > > mtk_fd_hw_job_finish(fd, VB2_BUF_STATE_ERROR); > > > > > > > > > dev_dbg(fd->dev, "%s, ret:%d\n", __func__, ret); > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > fd->fd_irq_result = 0; > > > > > > > > > } > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > static struct v4l2_m2m_ops fd_m2m_ops = { > > > > > > > > > .device_run = mtk_fd_device_run, > > > > > > > > > .job_abort = mtk_fd_job_abort, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I'm not sure we should be using the functon above as the .job_abort > > > > > > > > callback. It's expected to abort the job, but we're just waiting for > > > > > > > > it to finish. I think we should just call mtk_fd_job_abort() manually > > > > > > > > from .stop_streaming. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Ok, I will fix it. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > }; > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > and we could use it in suspend. > > > > > > > > > static int mtk_fd_suspend(struct device *dev) > > > > > > > > > { > > > > > > > > > struct mtk_fd_dev *fd = dev_get_drvdata(dev); > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > if (pm_runtime_suspended(dev)) > > > > > > > > > return 0; > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > if (fd->fd_stream_count) > > > > > > > > > mtk_fd_job_abort(fd->ctx); > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > /* suspend FD HW */ > > > > > > > > > writel(0x0, fd->fd_base + MTK_FD_REG_OFFSET_INT_EN); > > > > > > > > > writel(0x0, fd->fd_base + MTK_FD_REG_OFFSET_HW_ENABLE); > > > > > > > > > clk_disable_unprepare(fd->fd_clk); > > > > > > > > > dev_dbg(dev, "%s:disable clock\n", __func__); > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > return 0; > > > > > > > > > } > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > static irqreturn_t mtk_fd_irq(int irq, void *data) > > > > > > > > > { > > > > > > > > > struct mtk_fd_dev *fd = (struct mtk_fd_dev *)data; > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > fd->fd_irq_result = readl(fd->fd_base + MTK_FD_REG_OFFSET_INT_VAL); > > > > > > > > > wake_up_interruptible(&fd->wq); > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The wake up should be done at the very end of this function. Otherwise > > > > > > > > we end up with m2m framework racing with the mtk_fd_hw_job_finish() > > > > > > > > below. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Also, I'd use a completion here rather than an open coded wait and > > > > > > > > wake-up. The driver could reinit_completion() before queuing a job to > > > > > > > > the hardware and the IRQ handler would complete(). There would be no > > > > > > > > need to store the IRQ flags in driver data anymore. > > > > > > > Ok, It will be refined as following: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > suspend and stop streaming will call mtk_fd_job_abort() > > > > > > > > > > > > > > static void mtk_fd_job_abort(struct mtk_fd_dev *fd) > > > > > > > { > > > > > > > u32 ret; > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ret = wait_for_completion_timeout(&fd->fd_irq_done, > > > > > > > msecs_to_jiffies(MTK_FD_HW_TIMEOUT)); > > > > > > > if (ret) > > > > > > > > > > > > For the _timeout variants, !ret means the timeout and ret > 0 means > > > > > > that the wait ended successfully before. > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks, fixed. > > > > > > > > > > > Also please make sure that the timeout is big enough not to happen > > > > > > normally on a heavily loaded system. Something like 1 second should be > > > > > > good. > > > > > > > > > > > Ok, I will make it 1 second > > > > > #define MTK_FD_HW_TIMEOUT 1000 > > > > > > > > > > Also, I will add a condition in mtk_fd_vb2_stop_streaming(), since it > > > > > would be called twice, now it works fine whether I reuse the condition > > > > > with mtk_fd_hw_disconnect or not, however, I think do it before buffer > > > > > remove looks more reasonable. > > > > > > > > > > static void mtk_fd_vb2_stop_streaming(struct vb2_queue *vq) > > > > > { > > > > > struct mtk_fd_ctx *ctx = vb2_get_drv_priv(vq); > > > > > struct mtk_fd_dev *fd = ctx->fd_dev; > > > > > struct vb2_v4l2_buffer *vb; > > > > > struct v4l2_m2m_ctx *m2m_ctx = ctx->fh.m2m_ctx; > > > > > struct v4l2_m2m_queue_ctx *queue_ctx; > > > > > > > > > > if (vq->type == V4L2_BUF_TYPE_VIDEO_OUTPUT_MPLANE) > > > > > mtk_fd_job_abort(fd); > > > > > > > > We need to do it regardless of the queue type, otherwise we could > > > > still free CAPTURE buffers before the hardware releases them. > > > > > > > > > > I think we may read the fd->fd_irq_done.done and do wait for completion > > > if it's not being done. > > > How do you think? > > > > > > static void mtk_fd_vb2_stop_streaming(struct vb2_queue *vq) > > > { > > > struct mtk_fd_ctx *ctx = vb2_get_drv_priv(vq); > > > struct mtk_fd_dev *fd = ctx->fd_dev; > > > struct vb2_v4l2_buffer *vb; > > > struct v4l2_m2m_ctx *m2m_ctx = ctx->fh.m2m_ctx; > > > struct v4l2_m2m_queue_ctx *queue_ctx; > > > u32 ret; > > > > > > if (!fd->fd_irq_done.done) > > > > We shouldn't access internal fields of completion. > > > > > ret = wait_for_completion_timeout(&fd->fd_irq_done, > > > msecs_to_jiffies( > > > MTK_FD_HW_TIMEOUT)); > > > queue_ctx = V4L2_TYPE_IS_OUTPUT(vq->type) ? > > > &m2m_ctx->out_q_ctx : > > > &m2m_ctx->cap_q_ctx; > > > while ((vb = v4l2_m2m_buf_remove(queue_ctx))) > > > v4l2_m2m_buf_done(vb, VB2_BUF_STATE_ERROR); > > > > > > if (vq->type == V4L2_BUF_TYPE_VIDEO_OUTPUT_MPLANE) > > > mtk_fd_hw_disconnect(fd); > > > } > > > > > > I've also tried to wait completion unconditionally for both queues and > > > the second time will wait until timeout, as a result, it takes longer to > > > swap the camera every time and close the camera app. > > > > I think it should work better if we call complete_all() instead of complete(). > > > Thanks, > > I use complete_all(), and it works fine now. > > static void mtk_fd_vb2_stop_streaming(struct vb2_queue *vq) > { > struct mtk_fd_ctx *ctx = vb2_get_drv_priv(vq); > struct mtk_fd_dev *fd = ctx->fd_dev; > struct vb2_v4l2_buffer *vb; > struct v4l2_m2m_ctx *m2m_ctx = ctx->fh.m2m_ctx; > struct v4l2_m2m_queue_ctx *queue_ctx; > > wait_for_completion_timeout(&fd->fd_irq_done, > msecs_to_jiffies(MTK_FD_HW_TIMEOUT)); Shouldn't we still send some command to the hardware to stop? Like a reset. Otherwise we don't know if it isn't still accessing the memory. > queue_ctx = V4L2_TYPE_IS_OUTPUT(vq->type) ? > &m2m_ctx->out_q_ctx : > &m2m_ctx->cap_q_ctx; > while ((vb = v4l2_m2m_buf_remove(queue_ctx))) > v4l2_m2m_buf_done(vb, VB2_BUF_STATE_ERROR); > > if (vq->type == V4L2_BUF_TYPE_VIDEO_OUTPUT_MPLANE) > mtk_fd_hw_disconnect(fd); > } > > Best regards, > Jerry > > > Best regards, > > Tomasz > > _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel