From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.7 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 314BDC433ED for ; Thu, 20 May 2021 11:52:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from desiato.infradead.org (desiato.infradead.org [90.155.92.199]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B8AEA61090 for ; Thu, 20 May 2021 11:52:13 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org B8AEA61090 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=desiato.20200630; h=Sender:Content-Transfer-Encoding :Content-Type:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post:List-Archive: List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:Cc:To:Subject:Message-ID:Date:From:In-Reply-To: References:MIME-Version:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=hGK9sZz1K8+GxoJckRE77zJbSPPYNPSLs0AWHYHtanc=; b=OUSm477iiJijSHNHVgqO6ALWtY iT8AGaVFgaOO+Vwnpn2y13k4z1OveFVLXjaP1TSuEQ0rAEO5dwOdAB8UJw6KtOTmu5gQt1lvfzjgd /IIUWY3GTJ/yia0ayxY+CrgHDFoKH1BqhSNaNqUxfUTrHST3P+j3hKEkyBgSR0OayaLaxH40ZWcsW vsdt5aRV13FZbmiRbIe+dg+WSXmD+GGtuIj8eBl0UEIzBquUXJRRXImUql1oD3Qkzi7koRJcGhX9i IY/CM+oA2OZbn00JvBRSbVmr86NQZffBBadSxmc+2t00a+T2Oh0QuMyTDugn8C01PyPHd2FvKHa3n LAEttpow==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=desiato.infradead.org) by desiato.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1ljhCB-000c4j-LH; Thu, 20 May 2021 11:50:31 +0000 Received: from bombadil.infradead.org ([2607:7c80:54:e::133]) by desiato.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1ljhC7-000c3L-2H for linux-arm-kernel@desiato.infradead.org; Thu, 20 May 2021 11:50:27 +0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Content-Type:Cc:To:Subject:Message-ID :Date:From:In-Reply-To:References:MIME-Version:Sender:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description; bh=kA7gbYG5mZ/XE5ox6MsJ7wukpRv3oiq5D7tNsc46zVo=; b=sR36Pd6FdIo6GQFX3fvSUN65Bo rGSZLSCRV1OCG4Z45hqvTzY80/pZYbqEWTjJ9E3uaGttg3+tZj8V+/epaP9guxq3zWhp6ZtKDQOth ieuUQ7L00r3ITnRTDh9xlHQNb141g2nyqWHp3wVH9/N1YYUnZF2cjm90hpQnunRmXuG7rCxdYUkE9 lSS8/W4mSSCK9hQ1EyFob4FGKdihVDpqWc7g1b8bd1qHgeNs8kKNVP6MRKdCYJWLHttOoBkmpXPiH FDyvxswDFaCgdHoSJs5sN7WjYOKyfiHaCbFCb420BBU9ysDs+HY/Xn+Fm+nnhqWzabZQyXpVHG87k rLwLafDw==; Received: from mail-yb1-xb36.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4864:20::b36]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.94 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1ljhC3-00GH1V-5w for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Thu, 20 May 2021 11:50:25 +0000 Received: by mail-yb1-xb36.google.com with SMTP id y2so22360213ybq.13 for ; Thu, 20 May 2021 04:50:22 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=kA7gbYG5mZ/XE5ox6MsJ7wukpRv3oiq5D7tNsc46zVo=; b=vdSRm/MvOkj2jQDDq87RdfrUUuXYO0vQdgSzqw3sn0wA72CJChFzMh9Af+5g8S6oVp MOs/Hf0rhka+MGqnEtuc98XWsaRbTsgYCk/7Ez9tdkMGeUWYBs+HET/Tz5b3DfhPeYuL s1KGy3wMPfUjfSfv+xPjcxkrurXt3k9J5DIPWfCJVdB7VY7TocjTvsyKWV4sLyihG74Q oYCE/UbHH4J69AGYDK5n8Lo0GFuqkvSBV2AaoUEAcVkoTe+dMM85HNSO2ULriwujfwGG 6vDAujO/Mu8NUQur4bo/+WJMqW0g+J4fnokAi/RekXmHTY+UiskEsStnEbLXvHCxQ207 qsSQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=kA7gbYG5mZ/XE5ox6MsJ7wukpRv3oiq5D7tNsc46zVo=; b=P6EP0D/3m0B7F3SPj/F8iLJxHqNsP6gVzQj9Ihtz4AdNwobbnwBxwdZwu1bY+5P/J3 uXuXZTfLA4FUwxqOq8Wgo1xUQj5f0H1Fkeb65kvSn4Sm+v3oAfcGYQ5qImUKJ7hZvHcW kXTzZzAQi7fj1eFWs23YI3a2IWkNrE3/yBl41IIJxas1gAfsjigHrTV3gSY31EGQZELl 5nf5RSQAsZynvnMPrtaLvQPRIrrWdlApFyTuW/9DG/cHD9W12IONSrhm922TcFWXaof+ gh9mSF4fFgtkc8Wu4ACv2s2Kp2ZlPds/EOw9zxh7/BbIGrk39vpQaxBOxgvN+8Vtij5c cISw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5332V3h1VDnrhuZbkYwZ170u8eWLSEjRtepFvzomzGNy7/00QOPf JT+8TMfW1WsduNM4VWHLvmu03nwPZmAkBR6UyRA= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJz4v+1BCu8WOXRXaA62w7PQlZdArSe2T/Ikmc2udv9oOmGPo1CwQzOh8tXoGyW9z4cD7c0SLtAgBihXJP/ArK8= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6902:134f:: with SMTP id g15mr6765498ybu.278.1621511421871; Thu, 20 May 2021 04:50:21 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20210520104343.317119-1-joerichey94@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: From: Joseph Richey Date: Thu, 20 May 2021 04:50:11 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] Don't use BIT() macro in UAPI headers To: Borislav Petkov Cc: trivial@kernel.org, Joe Richey , Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , x86@kernel.org, "H. Peter Anvin" , Paolo Bonzini , Mark Rutland , Lorenzo Pieralisi , Mauro Carvalho Chehab , Zhangfei Gao , Zhou Wang , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-media@vger.kernel.org, linux-accelerators@lists.ozlabs.org X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20210520_045023_235136_35FC4CE0 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 12.38 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org > > Currently, the script actually _encourages_ users to use the BIT macro > > even if adding things to UAPI. > > How so? Running checkpatch.pl with --strict gives: CHECK: Prefer using the BIT macro #26: FILE: arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/hwcap2.h:9: +#define HWCAP2_FSGSBASE (1 << 1) It should probably just recommend the _BITUL macro. > Also, in your commit messages you refer to patches with patchwork links > - please use the respective upstream commit IDs instead. Grep for > "Fixes:" here: Ahhhhh, I figured there was a more standard way. Will fix. _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel