From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.0 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, INCLUDES_CR_TRAILER,INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 64EE0C433E0 for ; Thu, 18 Mar 2021 21:37:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from desiato.infradead.org (desiato.infradead.org [90.155.92.199]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C1C1F64F30 for ; Thu, 18 Mar 2021 21:37:34 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org C1C1F64F30 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=reject dis=none) header.from=google.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=desiato.20200630; h=Sender:Content-Transfer-Encoding :Content-Type:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post:List-Archive: List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:Cc:To:Subject:Message-ID:Date:From:In-Reply-To: References:MIME-Version:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=VLv6InUieuAu86cNy1WDO0VqrW27UnbMS3HRYB032dA=; b=YJ18FaYNYvYPRo/Rvb3/LDRqc A+Idf9nIzfA/1hCGGce04Sw1xGHLbxdbW9YGEvLa3+opELKdOBw/ybJ144ljp4+mXaDGFRI4Yv41P +Se4uA0AthKR88JuFg7EdEFSKYKV/c60OusHB39POKkdraKKjcLs/rV92k4mNMbvqV8m8s6D19yEC M6DklntW1tN5MFbE4dAgTiQvsf3MsNb8AIZR+85serwmwPmWYnw99bafiKxJ5sHIefNotgkUWnAQL VH8R89toATsm54W2j0cesLuVmZxDmpD6Lycj5xomqjhpuH7HR02KuTRlbDrwIMFTMNt580mfJFg2F aaUjeIHxQ==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=desiato.infradead.org) by desiato.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1lN0Hh-00634W-1q; Thu, 18 Mar 2021 21:34:25 +0000 Received: from mail-vs1-xe2d.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4864:20::e2d]) by desiato.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.94 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1lN0Es-0062wQ-Aa for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Thu, 18 Mar 2021 21:31:44 +0000 Received: by mail-vs1-xe2d.google.com with SMTP id e7so2361368vsq.3 for ; Thu, 18 Mar 2021 14:31:25 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=tdIaU5y5aj4CvY8gHTbhPiKBxK+0c5ivS4PVgMAZKZ8=; b=VQHQ/IJvAGsBh7hccszXuTdFbZijYzXgXzXCIzA2a7dJpcH6fMreeEP4JQX8vzYKQw 17gzUL7p9HLsJm+wzC+7kwxysSLLUOFU16pfSruy8k6oojzW6uUwDEqIIQ26n833XpIJ nRIT5osS4S0zWgKG08L3MvJDPQXbeiXJD6WWF5WIFCRxvrdTy84dUo63hUjFPxVpT7Qy r5rNK69CITHSj/xGsPVpV9x9ROfn6UB5BwpBhGwl6SCSaK4S3ZvoQ6/MX7DPhBlfODxu KDDy3/ne6shrgGrU4yEniwtyCra85G6v6KXM3roh3xjBdCjKrCkGBpOWV+Hs3zFkXA+U WlEg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=tdIaU5y5aj4CvY8gHTbhPiKBxK+0c5ivS4PVgMAZKZ8=; b=m41g3BUJZLyZedSLsyAytzu30pVsfoscp4HUUMquqkVsYtOTKtvjJDXO8AlIZH91DT giynNCZxxQg8ebbtF9lImptD3aiucnNLuZ5sHLV5xpWwliv0yj4xzpXwG4JE8WSYPf9a jJNYsjrwhWZtWMNnflmf1Stpo9wms1LZCerlU5HtftVupSXLBrfZJZK7piHAHD+BURSg BGxrCq6awiMCbldRj3uQAZgQ7fiJB8ktlihWf7UwVa0T4G+NOVGYEGJdg0bI5DUSJJYX MfzEunEIMDtnmvi9VJWVbZWn+DvnuT+clehncMDsrWeiCd36jpjfX2zTmseunbZps2rM Pm3A== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532r8MX08N3PBhInzNT2tY7KbGBVcy0Mj1KMKZNskOjXYcP/lJ5R FNN4pCZaHfhvbImD32JWK7sTxzgICUqJctoirDXu+w== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxlimnSXWyxeVH26Hx7MVzsZM1C2wpNoVlO6BH9QnMVU1txUFQEowbO9H2O2Syt3coKLcU+m/27jcEX/CvNAbI= X-Received: by 2002:a67:2803:: with SMTP id o3mr1129222vso.36.1616103083753; Thu, 18 Mar 2021 14:31:23 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20210318171111.706303-1-samitolvanen@google.com> <20210318171111.706303-10-samitolvanen@google.com> In-Reply-To: From: Sami Tolvanen Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2021 14:31:11 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 09/17] lib/list_sort: fix function type mismatches To: Nick Desaulniers Cc: Kees Cook , Nathan Chancellor , Masahiro Yamada , Will Deacon , Jessica Yu , Arnd Bergmann , Tejun Heo , "Paul E. McKenney" , Christoph Hellwig , bpf , linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch , Linux ARM , Linux Kbuild mailing list , PCI , LKML X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20210318_213140_477422_A4A3D0A1 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 42.45 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Thu, Mar 18, 2021 at 11:31 AM Nick Desaulniers wrote: > > On Thu, Mar 18, 2021 at 10:11 AM Sami Tolvanen wrote: > > > > Casting the comparison function to a different type trips indirect > > call Control-Flow Integrity (CFI) checking. Remove the additional > > consts from cmp_func, and the now unneeded casts. > > > > Fixes: 043b3f7b6388 ("lib/list_sort: simplify and remove MAX_LIST_LENGTH_BITS") > > Signed-off-by: Sami Tolvanen > > Reviewed-by: Kees Cook > > --- > > lib/list_sort.c | 8 ++++---- > > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/lib/list_sort.c b/lib/list_sort.c > > index 52f0c258c895..b14accf4ef83 100644 > > --- a/lib/list_sort.c > > +++ b/lib/list_sort.c > > @@ -8,7 +8,7 @@ > > #include > > > > typedef int __attribute__((nonnull(2,3))) (*cmp_func)(void *, > > - struct list_head const *, struct list_head const *); > > + struct list_head *, struct list_head *); > > > > /* > > * Returns a list organized in an intermediate format suited > > @@ -227,7 +227,7 @@ void list_sort(void *priv, struct list_head *head, > > There's definitely some const confusion going on around here. > Comparison functions that modify their in/out parameters are a code > smell, and I wonder if any exist in tree? > > I think it would be better to enforce one signature for cmp_func > throughout lib/list_sort.c and the tree, either const or not, but not > a mix of both. I know `const` is messy because it tends to propagate > everywhere, so I don't care which is preferred (making cmp_func have > const qualified params or not, though if we're already being pedantic > about which params are non-null...), but something like this might be > nicer: Sure, an alternative to removing the internal casts is to actually change all the callers to use a comparison function with const parameters. That's quite a bit more invasive, but I'm fine with that approach too. > > ``` > diff --git a/block/blk-mq-sched.c b/block/blk-mq-sched.c > index 5132f64a5cee..d475b3cfd06f 100644 > --- a/block/blk-mq-sched.c > +++ b/block/blk-mq-sched.c > @@ -75,7 +75,8 @@ void blk_mq_sched_restart(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx) > blk_mq_run_hw_queue(hctx, true); > } > > -static int sched_rq_cmp(void *priv, struct list_head *a, struct list_head *b) > +static int sched_rq_cmp(void *priv, const struct list_head *a, > + const struct list_head *b) > { > struct request *rqa = container_of(a, struct request, queuelist); > struct request *rqb = container_of(b, struct request, queuelist); > diff --git a/block/blk-mq.c b/block/blk-mq.c > index 2e825a7a3606..9ed063ffdb27 100644 > --- a/block/blk-mq.c > +++ b/block/blk-mq.c > @@ -1905,7 +1905,8 @@ void blk_mq_insert_requests(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx > *hctx, struct blk_mq_ctx *ctx, > spin_unlock(&ctx->lock); > } > > -static int plug_rq_cmp(void *priv, struct list_head *a, struct list_head *b) > +static int plug_rq_cmp(void *priv, const struct list_head *a, > + const struct list_head *b) > { > struct request *rqa = container_of(a, struct request, queuelist); > struct request *rqb = container_of(b, struct request, queuelist); > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_modes.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_modes.c > index 1ac67d4505e0..5a3a343499f6 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_modes.c > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_modes.c > @@ -1290,7 +1290,8 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(drm_mode_prune_invalid); > * Negative if @lh_a is better than @lh_b, zero if they're equivalent, or > * positive if @lh_b is better than @lh_a. > */ > -static int drm_mode_compare(void *priv, struct list_head *lh_a, > struct list_head *lh_b) > +static int drm_mode_compare(void *priv, const struct list_head *lh_a, > + const struct list_head *lh_b) > { > struct drm_display_mode *a = list_entry(lh_a, struct > drm_display_mode, head); > struct drm_display_mode *b = list_entry(lh_b, struct > drm_display_mode, head); > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_engine_user.c > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_engine_user.c > index 34e6096f196e..7586dffd27d3 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_engine_user.c > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_engine_user.c > @@ -49,7 +49,8 @@ static const u8 uabi_classes[] = { > [VIDEO_ENHANCEMENT_CLASS] = I915_ENGINE_CLASS_VIDEO_ENHANCE, > }; > > -static int engine_cmp(void *priv, struct list_head *A, struct list_head *B) > +static int engine_cmp(void *priv, const struct list_head *A, > + const struct list_head *B) > { > const struct intel_engine_cs *a = > container_of((struct rb_node *)A, typeof(*a), uabi_node); > diff --git a/fs/ext4/fsmap.c b/fs/ext4/fsmap.c > index 4c2a9fe30067..4493ef0c715e 100644 > --- a/fs/ext4/fsmap.c > +++ b/fs/ext4/fsmap.c > @@ -354,8 +354,8 @@ static unsigned int ext4_getfsmap_find_sb(struct > super_block *sb, > > /* Compare two fsmap items. */ > static int ext4_getfsmap_compare(void *priv, > - struct list_head *a, > - struct list_head *b) > + const struct list_head *a, > + const struct list_head *b) > { > struct ext4_fsmap *fa; > struct ext4_fsmap *fb; > diff --git a/fs/iomap/buffered-io.c b/fs/iomap/buffered-io.c > index 414769a6ad11..0129e6bab985 100644 > --- a/fs/iomap/buffered-io.c > +++ b/fs/iomap/buffered-io.c > @@ -1155,7 +1155,8 @@ iomap_ioend_try_merge(struct iomap_ioend *ioend, > struct list_head *more_ioends, > EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(iomap_ioend_try_merge); > > static int > -iomap_ioend_compare(void *priv, struct list_head *a, struct list_head *b) > +iomap_ioend_compare(void *priv, const struct list_head *a, > + const struct list_head *b) > { > struct iomap_ioend *ia = container_of(a, struct iomap_ioend, io_list); > struct iomap_ioend *ib = container_of(b, struct iomap_ioend, io_list); > diff --git a/include/linux/list_sort.h b/include/linux/list_sort.h > index 20f178c24e9d..4fe9cb94d0d1 100644 > --- a/include/linux/list_sort.h > +++ b/include/linux/list_sort.h > @@ -6,8 +6,9 @@ > > struct list_head; > > +typedef int __attribute__((nonnull(2,3))) (*cmp_func)(void *, > + struct list_head const *, struct list_head const *); > + Note that we already have cmp_func_t in linux/types.h, so something like list_cmp_func_t would probably be more appropriate here. > __attribute__((nonnull(2,3))) > -void list_sort(void *priv, struct list_head *head, > - int (*cmp)(void *priv, struct list_head *a, > - struct list_head *b)); > +void list_sort(void *priv, struct list_head *head, cmp_func cmp); > #endif > diff --git a/lib/list_sort.c b/lib/list_sort.c > index 52f0c258c895..6cfac649c4a6 100644 > --- a/lib/list_sort.c > +++ b/lib/list_sort.c > @@ -7,9 +7,6 @@ > #include > #include > > -typedef int __attribute__((nonnull(2,3))) (*cmp_func)(void *, > - struct list_head const *, struct list_head const *); > - > /* > * Returns a list organized in an intermediate format suited > * to chaining of merge() calls: null-terminated, no reserved or > @@ -185,9 +182,7 @@ static void merge_final(void *priv, cmp_func cmp, > struct list_head *head, > * 2^(k+1) - 1 (second merge of case 5 when x == 2^(k-1) - 1). > */ > __attribute__((nonnull(2,3))) > -void list_sort(void *priv, struct list_head *head, > - int (*cmp)(void *priv, struct list_head *a, > - struct list_head *b)) > +void list_sort(void *priv, struct list_head *head, cmp_func cmp) > { > struct list_head *list = head->next, *pending = NULL; > size_t count = 0; /* Count of pending */ > ``` > There are probably more instances in the tree to clean up, but that > compiles with x86_64 defconfig, and I'm sure it doesn't suffer the CFI > issue from the cast. You indeed missed some callers, but after fixing all the remaining ones too, arm64 and x86_64 allyesconfigs still seem to build just fine for me: arch/arm64/kvm/vgic/vgic-its.c | 8 ++++---- arch/arm64/kvm/vgic/vgic.c | 2 +- block/blk-mq-sched.c | 2 +- block/blk-mq.c | 2 +- drivers/acpi/nfit/core.c | 2 +- drivers/acpi/numa/hmat.c | 2 +- drivers/clk/keystone/sci-clk.c | 4 ++-- drivers/gpu/drm/drm_modes.c | 2 +- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_engine_user.c | 2 +- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/debugfs.c | 2 +- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/i915_gem_gtt.c | 2 +- drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_cs.c | 4 ++-- drivers/infiniband/hw/usnic/usnic_uiom_interval_tree.c | 2 +- drivers/interconnect/qcom/bcm-voter.c | 2 +- drivers/md/raid5.c | 2 +- drivers/misc/sram.c | 4 ++-- drivers/nvme/host/core.c | 2 +- drivers/pci/controller/cadence/pcie-cadence-host.c | 3 ++- drivers/spi/spi-loopback-test.c | 2 +- fs/btrfs/raid56.c | 2 +- fs/btrfs/tree-log.c | 2 +- fs/btrfs/volumes.c | 2 +- fs/ext4/fsmap.c | 4 ++-- fs/gfs2/glock.c | 2 +- fs/gfs2/log.c | 2 +- fs/gfs2/lops.c | 2 +- fs/iomap/buffered-io.c | 2 +- fs/ubifs/gc.c | 6 +++--- fs/ubifs/replay.c | 4 ++-- fs/xfs/scrub/bitmap.c | 4 ++-- fs/xfs/xfs_bmap_item.c | 4 ++-- fs/xfs/xfs_buf.c | 4 ++-- fs/xfs/xfs_extent_busy.c | 4 ++-- fs/xfs/xfs_extent_busy.h | 2 +- fs/xfs/xfs_extfree_item.c | 4 ++-- fs/xfs/xfs_refcount_item.c | 4 ++-- fs/xfs/xfs_rmap_item.c | 4 ++-- include/linux/list_sort.h | 7 ++++--- lib/list_sort.c | 17 ++++++----------- lib/test_list_sort.c | 2 +- net/tipc/name_table.c | 4 ++-- 41 files changed, 68 insertions(+), 71 deletions(-) I'll have to double check that all the affected code is actually included in these builds, but if nobody objects and I don't run into any issues, I'll include the patch in v3. Sami _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel