From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: zlim.lnx@gmail.com (Z Lim) Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2014 19:02:48 -0700 Subject: [PATCH 00/14] arm64: eBPF JIT compiler In-Reply-To: <20140826095804.GB23445@arm.com> References: <1405708100-13604-1-git-send-email-zlim.lnx@gmail.com> <20140721091623.GA16122@arm.com> <20140723103219.GA1366@localhost> <20140826095804.GB23445@arm.com> Message-ID: To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org Hi Will, On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 2:58 AM, Will Deacon wrote: > Hi Z Lim, > > On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 05:55:36AM +0100, Z Lim wrote: >> On Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at 3:32 AM, Catalin Marinas >> wrote: >> > On Mon, Jul 21, 2014 at 04:49:29PM +0100, Alexei Starovoitov wrote: >> >> On Mon, Jul 21, 2014 at 2:16 AM, Will Deacon wrote: >> >> > On Fri, Jul 18, 2014 at 07:28:06PM +0100, Zi Shen Lim wrote: >> [...] >> >> >> This series applies against net-next and is tested working >> >> >> with lib/test_bpf on ARMv8 Foundation Model. >> >> > >> >> > Looks like it works on my Juno board too, so: >> >> > >> >> > Acked-by: Will Deacon >> >> > >> >> > for the series. >> >> > >> >> > It's a bit late for 3.17 now, so I guess we'll queue this for 3.18 (which >> >> > also means the dependency on -next isn't an issue). Perhaps you could repost >> >> > around -rc3? >> >> >> >> Thanks for testing! Nice to see it working on real hw. >> >> I'm not sure why you're proposing a 4+ week delay. The patches >> >> will rot instead of getting used and tested. Imo it makes sense to >> >> get them into net-next now for 3.17. >> >> JIT is disabled by sysctl by default anyway. >> > >> > We normally like some patches (especially new functionality) to sit in >> > linux-next for a while before the mering window (ideally starting with >> > -rc4 or -rc5). We are at -rc6 already, so getting close to the 3.17 >> > merging window. >> > >> > Another aspect is that the arm64/bpf branch depends on the net tree, so >> > it can't easily go in via the arm64 tree for 3.17 (3.18 would not be a >> > problem). >> >> Hi Catalin, I take it you prefer this series going through arm64 tree, >> targeting 3.18, is that right? >> >> I understand your preference to have it sitting in linux-next for a >> longer period for arm64 material, I'll repost this again after 3.17 so >> it gets more exposure in linux-next. > > Any chance you could post a new version of this, based on a 3.17 -rc, > please? Whilst your current patches apply, I get a bunch of errors if I try > to build them. Sure. I just rebased onto -rc2 and fixed up as necessary due to changes introduced in net. I'll post a v2 shortly. Thanks for the reminder :) z > > Cheers, > > Will